A few more:

” Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
David Brower, First Executive Director of the Sierra Club

“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy…”
Amory Lovins, ‘Rocky Mountain Institute’

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

Anthropogenic climate change is ten percent science and ninety percent political opportunism. It is the rare politician that understands fundamental scientific principals but they all understand the use and advantage of power. AGW provides them with an ideal tool to serve these ends. Our education system has deteriorated to the extent that critical thinking is nearly extinct and is even considered to be antisocial. Belief has replaced understanding and appreciation of fundamental principals has been replaced by mantras. "This is the way the world ends, not with a bang but with a whimper."

"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temp[erature]s to the data series...from 1981 onwards, and to 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."

Speaking: Phil Jones, Director, Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK. For "Mike" read Michael Mann, then at the University of Virginia. For "Keith" read Keith Briffa, also at CRU-UEA--Phil Jones' junior colleague.

"We cannot show a warming trend, and it is a travesty that we can't." -- Kevin Trenberth, one of Phil Jones' professional associates (not necessarily at the same institution).

Those are the two most damning quotes I personally found when a UK correspondent sent me a link that let me track down the original Climate-gate Archive. It was I who, writing as "Essex County (New Jersey) Conservative Examiner," on 19 November 2009, moved the Climate-gate story out of the blogosphere (e.g., Anthony Watts' Watts Up With That) and into the realm of semi-professional journalism. Thirty-five thousand page views and a link-back in The Wall Street Journal later, my writing had made an impact: Phil Jones had a three-egg omelet on his face and had to take a leave of absence on the strength of it.

But my biggest proof this is a scam: those who perpetrate it, don't even believe it themselves. They do not live their beliefs. Why did the delegates to the Fifteenth Conference of Parties to the Framework Agreement on Climate Change (COP-15), held in December 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark, travel there in 140 private jet aircraft, and, once arrived, rent out every chauffeured limousine then available on the entire continent of Europe? If you believe in a thing like this, do you not take pains to restrict severely the travel by the delegate to, from, and at the venue? Do you not indeed select the travel centroid of the world, which is Lod (formally Lydda) Airport outside Tel Aviv, Israel, as your venue? Indeed, why even have a physical conference? Why not virtualize it, using Skype or OpenSim, the open-source engine for Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games?

Alert! Alert! Alert!
Tomorrow shall be a most significant date for Man-made Climate Change..

Like most other pious hypocrites, the climate change people aren't too bright. If wealth redistribution is really the goal, then it seems forcing crippling restrictions on the world's most potent economy is counterproductive. Driving the U.S. into poverty with skyrocketing energy costs doesn't leave much wealth to be redistributed. It simply increases the world poverty level to spread misery to all.

Reality is merciless. The world's energy supply today is 70% hydrocarbon, 20% nuclear, 7% hydroelectric, and 3% solar/wind/geothermal. If I want to increase the percentage of supply from renewables rapidly, then my only choice is to expend the supply I have the most of, which is hydrocarbon, until the renewables start to become a more significant contributor. Restricting the use of hydrocarbon fuel means the growth in renewables will be likewise restricted. There are no magic wands to refute facts, or as Ayn Rand would say, "A is STILL A."

The climate alarmists do not even know that which they protest against. There is not, nor has there ever been (as far as I know) a government that allowed Capitalism. The system they actually are protesting against is a modern form of rule by the entitled - the kings, dukes, earls, etc. of today do not have fancy titles, but they rule in the same way. Rand referred to it as an 'Aristocracy of Pull' - a perfect descriptor in my opinion.

Whenever a distraction is needed from another scandal or screw-up on the left, out come the CCR, the Climate Change Rangers. They distract the buzz by changing the subject. I'm always flummoxed by the vast number of people who will believe something as if their life depended on it without any real evidence at all.
The sky is falling!
We're all gonna die, even Superman.
So...who cares if Mrs. Clinton is a lying, thieving, felon?

The UN Ha long declared capitalism unsustainable, which means it stops them from the control they seek over all. They now include other thing in the unsustainable category, claiming it is to save the environment - such things as red meat, A/C, refrigeration, living in rural areas, reproducing without their permission, private ownership of p roperty is a big target for them. All these things let us be free and able to pursue capitalism. Instead of teaching our youth how it works, they teach them to hate capitalism, when they should teach other countries how it works. It is all about power and profit for a handful of elite worldwide. Hillary and Obama have both promised the UN they would support implementation of UN Agenda 21 in the US. Years ago, Hillary as First Lady, visited communes in the northwest US, raving how that was they way to go. Move all to the city, into communes or high rises. It is obviously easier to control them. All this was promoted as a way to save the environment. If they really cared about pollution, why let China pollute, same atmosphere. It they worried about climate, why heat the ionesphere using HAARP in Alaska and Puerto Rico. Why use HAMP to practice moving hurricanes? //Because none of it is about environment, just about control of people. They play with weather control, but worry about cow gas? Really, do they honestly think we are this stupid. They are hoping.

Having been in and out of this issue for a long time, and even at one time believing warming was real but that any solution was untenable, it should become clearer to us that the whole present day issue has more to do with a political power grab than anything.

The world has not warmed much, or has not warmed at all in the last 15 years. The extreme weather reports have increased exponentially. And yet, I recall Hurricane Andrew and Katrina before the whole climate change nonsense came into its current incarnation. Those were much worse.

Pollution is awful, let's not kid ourselves. But the global welfare state is not the answer to environmental woes. Property rights are. Extending property rights is the answer. Not deleting them.

If climate change means anything to me, it means political climate change. It means dark ages all over again. And we have to fight it to the fullest because that is our choice.

I stopped listening to the global warming pundits awhile ago. Climates change all the time and there is plenty of time for people adjust to it

Now, if we could get everyone else to realize this, that would cut the kakistocracy to the quick.

When all of the wealth that does exist is depleted where will the money come from to continue to supply the needs of all the people on earth? The sooner the wealth people pull in their horns and end producing the sooner the poor will attack those who seek to make them wards of the state.

Yes

The GW movement has simply been another Statist ploy to destroy Capitalism. The evidence of a serious threat has never existed; GW (as such) may be the greatest myth perpetrated on the public since the belief in a supernatural.

I think the whole return of Lemuria is also of great importance. Got Tin Foil?

Far more important than those faked pictures of ice sheets calving and not being replenished, all those 'shopped satellite images of the "allegedly" shrinking Greenland Ice Cap (and the totally bogus accounts of weather interactions due to the changed flow of the Atlantic)... is the need to refute it because of some evil mechanizations by some unnamed group of people.

And what about those bogus and conspiratorial news stories (supported by the secret enslavement cabal) fabricated about flooding and weird snow patterns - you know its all a scam to overthrow business. The snow - is all a lie. The drought in California - never happened. The tornadoes in the midwest, east coast, and now California - what, you believe those photos and people claiming to live there? Those 4.2 earthquakes in northwest Nevada are all a conspiratorial plot (and "they" are using mind control on all 116 people in Vya, Nevada, to make them believe there are earthquakes there, for some evil and unannounced plan...)...

You really don't believe you were snowed on... or there was a drought in California. Alll those mercury and spirit thermometers are all tied in together (via Lemurian Null-Radiation) to all show the same thing to enslave people, not to accurately show fact.

That certainly is a different spin on "objective" and "rational" than the one I believe. As well as a different read on what are facts in front of ones face. What I believe - is physical evidence. If the evidence says "A", then tellimg me the truth is the physical evidence is lying - for some conspiracy - is definitely NOT "A".