Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
I think a lot of us believe that the whole Global Warming thing is a scam. IBD seems to have come to that conclusion, and their logic matches some of what I have heard here in the Gulch. Nothing new, but it validates the idea of not buying into something that does not operate on a tainted data base.
” Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
David Brower, First Executive Director of the Sierra Club
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy…”
Amory Lovins, ‘Rocky Mountain Institute’
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
...or people have to really be held responsible for their actions.
arrival of our first inter- or intra-galactic visitor might
unite us. . or put us in our place as students of reality. -- j
.
Speaking: Phil Jones, Director, Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK. For "Mike" read Michael Mann, then at the University of Virginia. For "Keith" read Keith Briffa, also at CRU-UEA--Phil Jones' junior colleague.
"We cannot show a warming trend, and it is a travesty that we can't." -- Kevin Trenberth, one of Phil Jones' professional associates (not necessarily at the same institution).
Those are the two most damning quotes I personally found when a UK correspondent sent me a link that let me track down the original Climate-gate Archive. It was I who, writing as "Essex County (New Jersey) Conservative Examiner," on 19 November 2009, moved the Climate-gate story out of the blogosphere (e.g., Anthony Watts' Watts Up With That) and into the realm of semi-professional journalism. Thirty-five thousand page views and a link-back in The Wall Street Journal later, my writing had made an impact: Phil Jones had a three-egg omelet on his face and had to take a leave of absence on the strength of it.
But my biggest proof this is a scam: those who perpetrate it, don't even believe it themselves. They do not live their beliefs. Why did the delegates to the Fifteenth Conference of Parties to the Framework Agreement on Climate Change (COP-15), held in December 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark, travel there in 140 private jet aircraft, and, once arrived, rent out every chauffeured limousine then available on the entire continent of Europe? If you believe in a thing like this, do you not take pains to restrict severely the travel by the delegate to, from, and at the venue? Do you not indeed select the travel centroid of the world, which is Lod (formally Lydda) Airport outside Tel Aviv, Israel, as your venue? Indeed, why even have a physical conference? Why not virtualize it, using Skype or OpenSim, the open-source engine for Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games?
Tomorrow shall be a most significant date for Man-made Climate Change..
.
.
.
.
Why? I just had this thought.
On April's Fool Day, a prankster is expected to have the good manners of saying "April's Fool" after pulling something over on somebody.
elephant in a china shop. -- j
.
Reality is merciless. The world's energy supply today is 70% hydrocarbon, 20% nuclear, 7% hydroelectric, and 3% solar/wind/geothermal. If I want to increase the percentage of supply from renewables rapidly, then my only choice is to expend the supply I have the most of, which is hydrocarbon, until the renewables start to become a more significant contributor. Restricting the use of hydrocarbon fuel means the growth in renewables will be likewise restricted. There are no magic wands to refute facts, or as Ayn Rand would say, "A is STILL A."
Another brain warming nagging thought: If the taxpayer funded multi-billion dollar weather service can't accurately predict the weather next week, how in hell are they forecasting for the next century? I figure it must have something to do with planetary alignments in an assortment of constellations.
Yeah, I'm late to this conversation, but this is my 2 cents.
The sky is falling!
We're all gonna die, even Superman.
So...who cares if Mrs. Clinton is a lying, thieving, felon?
Glitterati with their meds
Who else would keep
The leftists in check.
Madison Avenue and
Hollywood too,
Imagine results
Of a nightly news
Without a steady
Prescription supply
With none left over
For the Beltway crowd
Shudder Perish such thought
Can't be allowed.
Who knows
What would happen
If they went Cold Turkey
If we allowed
Each crisis to unfold
Without their shaky
Guiding hand
Turkey is needed
It's makes such good ham
And such fun to watch
Every November
As they try to escape
the results of October
When the counting is over
Results are clear
It's just another Turkey ham year.
The witch or the bitch.
Why else is the current and recent past as well as not so recent presidents hellbent on giving power over us or US to the UN. NWO
The world has not warmed much, or has not warmed at all in the last 15 years. The extreme weather reports have increased exponentially. And yet, I recall Hurricane Andrew and Katrina before the whole climate change nonsense came into its current incarnation. Those were much worse.
Pollution is awful, let's not kid ourselves. But the global welfare state is not the answer to environmental woes. Property rights are. Extending property rights is the answer. Not deleting them.
If climate change means anything to me, it means political climate change. It means dark ages all over again. And we have to fight it to the fullest because that is our choice.
When he said "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believe is false,"
The enemy is within.
which eliminates discourse.
Never let a good crisis go to waste. Rammo Immanuel.
Vote for Hillary or Sreisand will return to the USA and be elected
Far more important than those faked pictures of ice sheets calving and not being replenished, all those 'shopped satellite images of the "allegedly" shrinking Greenland Ice Cap (and the totally bogus accounts of weather interactions due to the changed flow of the Atlantic)... is the need to refute it because of some evil mechanizations by some unnamed group of people.
And what about those bogus and conspiratorial news stories (supported by the secret enslavement cabal) fabricated about flooding and weird snow patterns - you know its all a scam to overthrow business. The snow - is all a lie. The drought in California - never happened. The tornadoes in the midwest, east coast, and now California - what, you believe those photos and people claiming to live there? Those 4.2 earthquakes in northwest Nevada are all a conspiratorial plot (and "they" are using mind control on all 116 people in Vya, Nevada, to make them believe there are earthquakes there, for some evil and unannounced plan...)...
You really don't believe you were snowed on... or there was a drought in California. Alll those mercury and spirit thermometers are all tied in together (via Lemurian Null-Radiation) to all show the same thing to enslave people, not to accurately show fact.
That certainly is a different spin on "objective" and "rational" than the one I believe. As well as a different read on what are facts in front of ones face. What I believe - is physical evidence. If the evidence says "A", then tellimg me the truth is the physical evidence is lying - for some conspiracy - is definitely NOT "A".
Here's how science works: You have a theory. You test the theory (in the real world, not a computer), and if the results match what you predicted, you have evidence in favor of your theory. If it doesn't, your theory is wrong. You need to correct your theory, not call people names.
The Global warming theories are far more complex than the simplistic CO2 absorbs heat -- and they are wrong, they have consistently failed to predict subsequent events.
And, yes, the climate changes. All the time.
I guess we'll see...
Are their real problems yes, can they be solved? to some extent. But not by one country. How much of our pollutants comes across the pacific from China? Now they are switching from bicycles to automobiles and already lead the world in burning coal still building but in 2011 numbered 2, 500 and as for Chinese labor. Mongolia average annual was $20,000 US back then nearer $25,000 now.
In the world of pollution and the world of economics we are no longer number one.But damn aren't we pretty all green and everything...
I watch it as well usually with the sound off (most of the contributors are full of it) but I love to see the amazing archeological sites around the globe!
In the past the Earth has been very warm and very cold in fact during the last ice age Canada was covered with 2 mile thick ice then the ice melted during dare I say global warming. That was long before Jed Clampett was shooting at some food and up from the ground came some bubbling crude.
While we have been losing ice in the northern hemisphere we have been gaining ice in the Antarctic.
I find the evidence of govt manipulation and the 19 Trillion in debt more threatening.
If you think that there isn't a conspiracy amongst the NWO crowd you should do a little homework.
Start with The Bilderberg Group ,The Bohemian Grove crowd The trilateral commission the council on foreign relations Jekyll island club the federal reserve for starters.
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newwor...
I realize most people question some of these sources, but I found this description of it's goals and methods to be rather disturbingly accurate to what we see. Maybe there is some truth to it.