Robert Heinlein, et al.
We can and will add others whom we acknowledge or even admire, but I am willing to bet that of all the science fiction writers, Heinlein is held in the highest regard here.
"I would say that my position is not too far from that of Ayn Rand's; that I would like to see government reduced to no more than internal police and courts, external armed forces — with the other matters handled otherwise. I'm sick of the way the government sticks its nose into everything, now.
The Robert Heinlein Interview (1973)" -- https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_...
(But even this one resource provides a rich array to choose from.)
Every law that was ever written opened up a new way to graft. -- Red Planet (1949)
"I would say that my position is not too far from that of Ayn Rand's; that I would like to see government reduced to no more than internal police and courts, external armed forces — with the other matters handled otherwise. I'm sick of the way the government sticks its nose into everything, now.
The Robert Heinlein Interview (1973)" -- https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_...
(But even this one resource provides a rich array to choose from.)
Every law that was ever written opened up a new way to graft. -- Red Planet (1949)
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
For those in the service a division of those too far along the career path and to close to retirement to who are not replaced just retired at the earliest opportunity. Regardless of rank 20 years and phased out. The remainder under go two to four weeks of infantry training including APRT (physical testing) and weapons qualification ANNUALLY rotating and the requirement is they pass APRT, weapons qualification etc. annually and weight control or be passed over for promotions, all schools, and not allowed to re-enlist or if commissioned are just released. What you end up with is a reverse of the seven to the rear 1 forward ratio of combat ready troops. What would they do?:
One is provide their own unit's security when in the field which affects some unit's nearer the 'front lines' A ban on the use of combat units to provide security or ash and trash details goes into effect.
Secondly a ready pool of trained and deployable replacements. Eachi non combat unit would be required to maintain a roster of the stay and go members. Infantry needs bodies the go members go... the stay members continue the mission. mission essential numbers would of course vary but half the administrative or cooks and drivers and clerks staff would be about right. Too include Pentagon units.If someone is in a school or on leave etc. they are replaced with another name. One day a clerk in the Pentagon next day a member of 1st squad 2nd platoon Company A, 1st Battalion, 1st infantry Regiment. En route. with A and B bag. This means immediate deployables have shot records, gas mask optical inserts, wills, already done all the time.
4th Division or 5th Corps or whatever needs security troops they provide there own from the same lists.
etc.
Nothing the Corps hasn't been doing successfully for two centuries.
given ten years or so the phase out /in is complete. How do you tell those deployable. The ones that are wear Berets the one's that aren't where overseas caps or baseball caps. The want to play 'elite' they get to do it for real.
A cut from the past higher numbers of 30% total strength would then have been acceptable, Divisions etc. manned and ready. And computer systems brought in to take up the slack when deployables went forward.
Annual training includes at least one week long field exercise.
Same for reserves including guard units.
Bingo 7 to 1 ratio tooth to tail available and 3 to one ratio combat units to rear echelon units.
Civilian employees counted as part of the rear echelon numbers.
Don't like it....hit the bricks. Part of being a volunteer force
That was a fast exercise in leadership decision making. Before refinements Any so called leader that couldn't have reached that or a simiilar plan in one minute or less should be part of the automatic 30% cuts.
Air Force and Navy same thing with Naval Infantry and Air Infantry personnel trained for base and port and shipboard protection and security. Easily done using Marines or US Army Special Forces intitially then Armiy or Marine drill instructors to bring them up to speed.
One more thing. USMC made a separate department. Under the above paragraph they wouldn't be needed as babysitters for the Navy anymore. As the Presidents own they would retain the Embassy and White House and Camp David function IF needed. No sense carrying a good thing too far...
(My opinion, your mileage may vary)
If I could take a wrench and screwdriver to history, I would settle "taxation without representation" by creating the British Commonwealth in 1770 with an imperial parliament uniting republics around the globe.
(And I would have ignored France and Napoleon entirely. It was not the worse thing to happen to Europe. There was no reason for the UK to attack France over their revolution.)
Load more comments...