11

Is America ready to go Galt and doesn't know it?

Posted by coaldigger 9 years, 2 months ago to Politics
59 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I spend a lot of time lately contemplating “natural laws”. The evolution of mankind occurred by and under the influence of things that are and that he cannot control over time. The leaning tower of Pisa is not defying the law of gravity, but succumbing to it gradually despite the efforts of Italian engineers and we know who will win in the long run. The pyramids have lasted far longer than other man-made structures because the use gravity instead of oppose it.
It is possible to organize society in many ways, most of which have resulted in chaos because they only work by the use of outside force. Statist systems rely on force to command individuals but even those that benefit the most eventually come to the conclusion that they are dissatisfied with the coercion and corruption that thrives as an unintended consequence. Systems based on individual rights and freedom comply with natural laws and outlast those organizing philosophies based on the collective.
The flaw in systems based on freedom was clearly identified at its birth by one of the founding fathers of the most successful government in the history of mankind. Benjamin Franklin, in a letter to a pair of priests in Passy who he knew during his time there, he said “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” The degree of success achieved by the American people has been in direct proportion to their virtue and this is a natural law as well. This virtue is not religious but the actions of individuals acting in their own long-term interest while accepting that all others must have the right to do likewise.
I see us failing not because of any intellectual shift to the right or left but due to inattention to the law of virtue. Lying to achieve public office, cronyism, looting, seeking unearned rewards, coercion of others for personal gain and shirking personal responsibilities are not virtuous behaviors and a vast majority of America has become addicted to these traits.
We were never perfect. Franklin saw that but felt that the rewards of striving to maintain a life of freedom would inspire an effort to be a people of virtue. I see the current “voter revolt” to be an unconscious rejection of the mess that has been made but without the presence of a virtuous leader they are saying we don’t really know what we want but we know that we don’t want the political class that brought us to this result. Be it Sanders or Trump, neither is more of the same. This may seem like a dangerous reaction but is probably better than more of the same. All we need is a Galt.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
    Virtue is based on reason and it is the drift from reason that is the source of the problem.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 9 years, 2 months ago
    We had her; Ayn Rand. For without her his character would never have existed. Now if you take the time to read beyond Atlas she expands on all that has gone wrong as you will find out and after reading all of here essays you will unfortunately realize that this country the USA is going down hill and never coming back. I give it 40 years or sooner.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years, 2 months ago
    I see "natural laws" as those principles that one, increase the ability to survive, and, two, enhance the quality of life for everyone, equally. I also see the Ten Commandments as specificity toward natural law. For example, "Thou shalt not steal" is a natural law in that if you take someone's stuff, he might kick your ass. Same with "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife"..... because that guy might kick your ass. Natural laws are not about morality, they are about common sense approaches to dealing with the vicissitudes of life. That they fit someone's sense of morality is irrelevant, though a moral basis, for some people, strengthens their effect/affect on life in general which is good. Natural laws increase survival and enhance the quality of life, equally IF they are exercised equally.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Shhhh, Mamaemma. The Hawaiian government doesn't want the million single mothers of NYC, DC, Boston, and Chicago to know they are only a few airline tickets from paradise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, jb.
    For the past 6 years the only reason to have money in a bank is for convenience in making payments. That is the original function of money. The market is slowly bringing alternative methods to achieve this and that process is being inhibited by the federal reserve act which gives an unearned and unfair advantage in the cost-free creation of "legal tender" to the banking cartel. If we want a free market and a productive economy, the banking cartel (established by the federal reserve act) must end. True free market competition in banking would do more to encourage business formation and job creation than any other (budget neutral) single government action.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 2 months ago
    A perfect time for going Galt en masse would be when the Federal Reserve follows through on negative interest rates. When people decide that it makes more sense to put money under their mattresses rather than in banks, that could easily be the tipping point.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 2 months ago
    This post is my thought exactly. I keep expecting a Ron Paul-like alternative, instead of a Sanders or Trump, to appear. I imagine people oscillating back-and-forth between Trump-like and Sanders-like figures until they conclude gov't isn't the answer for whatever problem they were hoping Trump or Sanders would solve.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
    Let's take a specific example. If a 25 year old woman and her boyfriend want to have a baby,they have 2 choices. If they marry before having that baby, therefore taking personal responsibility, the costs involved are substantial, probably requiring both the mother and father to work full time in order to pay for their and their child's existence.
    On the other hand, if they choose instead to not marry, then the costs of the birth and the maintenance of the child are "free". In Hawaii, an un wed mother with 2 children would have to get a job making $64,000 a year in order to live the same lifestyle she lives while on welfare.
    Can we reasonably expect virtue in these circumstances? I maintain that the virtue is not the act of marriage, but rather self reliance.
    Considering these economic facts, I find it amazing and heartening that so many young couples choose the high road. It certainly punishes them financially.
    My point is that our culture today punishes virtue and rewards indolence, which definitely goes against the natural order, doesn't it?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo