11

Falling oil prices, the Iran deal, and Obama managing the decline of US

Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 1 month ago to Economics
88 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Do you remember when several of Obama's lackeys talked about managing the decline of the United States (and for that matter, Western civilization)?

Most of us remember what an odd deal the Obama administration made with the Iranians. Most people criticized the deal, but focused on the nuclear aspects. What most people didn't realize is that we also lifted economic sanctions on Iran, thereby increasing their GDP by 100-150 billion dollars per year. When is the lifting of those economic sanctions taking effect? TODAY. Is it any wonder that crude oil prices are going down precipitously?

What are the consequences of all this? A number of coal, shale-derived oil, shale-derived natural gas, biofuel, and solar energy companies (including those he propped up via cronyism) have either gone bankrupt or are about to do so, and the major oil companies have taken quite a hit. All of this is part of the management of the decline of the U.S.

Not coincidentally, a number of other countries are really taking a financial bath, too, as a result of Obama's meddling. Russia, Saudi Arabia, Libya, and a number of other Muslim countries are severely destabilized as a result of drastically lower oil prices. Some of these countries may actually be wanting to drive down oil prices to bankrupt competition, particularly from North Dakota. In 1982 plus or minus a year, the price of oil went from 50 dollars per barrel down to 8 to eliminate American competition, before coming back up gradually.

For those of you not personally involved with the energy business like I am, the net effect on you is lower energy costs, and therefore, significantly deflationary pressure overall. Many Gulchers, and most people in the U.S,. will like this outcome. But as for me, the Iran deal was consummated at MY expense!


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 1 month ago
    I do not correlate the Iran deal with the lower oil costs directly, unless Saudi Arabia is doing it as a means to limit funds available to Iran.

    I DO NOT support the lifting of sanctions on Iran. They cannot be trusted, and this will not change their corrupt government. Therefore, the sanction should have stayed.

    Lower energy prices, unless controlled by government spending, are disruptive but good overall.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I also thought it incredibly ironic that he accused Cruz of being a "nasty person" - as if somehow he was immune from such a label.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately the Dems (both the culprits for the most part) have basically restricted our competitiveness by pushing such poor legislation. The Establishment Republicans have been just about as bad. We need to have another revolution such as the one that Reagan gave us to get us back our competitive edge. Something that Obama absolutely does not want!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I have no problem with his objectivist tendencies however I do have a problem with his embracing of all of those "big government" Democrats and their policies. Either he meant what he said when he was writing all of those checks or he is truly a Crony-capitalist and will govern as such. This doesn't do those of us who hang in the Gulch much good now does it?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Iranian oil is the one, two punch to its nuclear weapons......This could signal a technical knockout by our president who is throwing the match!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump stands for ... himself, as he should. As for foundational principles, Trump's only principle is self-interest. This is a great principle, but you do need more than just self-interest.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Also, can anyone tell me what he truly stands for. All of his populist rhetoric has precious little history to show that he means what he says.

    With that being said, he has been able to take the steam out of the Conservative who are still in the race (I.e., Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson etc.). Could it be that he is either an Establishment or Democrat Trojan Horse? I wonder....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I know everyone is significantly affected by all of this. I'm just a little closer to it, as I have been on almost all sides of the energy sector (solar, hydrogen, biofuels, oil, natural gas, syngas).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't think electing Biff from Back to the Future is likely to result in innovation or anything positive.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 1 month ago
    SOX and Patent reform hurt the country as a whole, but particularly my business.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    We are already in the throws of the 3rd WW. It just hasn't been declared as of yet. Our illustrious Command in Chief is fiddling while the world is burning, thanks in large part to his ineptitude or worse, plan.....
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo