- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
In Article 1 of the First Protocol: Protection of Property, paragraph 1. "Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the 'public interest' and 'subject to the conditions provided for by law' and by the general principles of international law."
If 'public interest' can be looked at & if an acknowledgement that in light of recent & increasingly common distressing occurrences, the 'public interest' is no longer being served, that may be sufficient leverage to bust the door open ready for a string of other petitions using Human Rights law to regain a quality of life we are 'entitled' to. Kinda playing government, & every fundamentalist mooching terrorist crook at their own game. Notice no mention of guns at all...
"The 2010 book Stab Proof Scarecrows surmised that "chav" was an abbreviation for "council housed and violent"" Wikipedia. Think Starnesville teenagers.
(I had to google chavs.)
Load more comments...