11

Who Needs Enemies? by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years, 5 months ago to Government
32 comments | Share | Flag

If, way back in 2001, the Bush administration had been serious, as it said it was, about going after “state sponsors of terrorism,” the first front should have opened against Saudi Arabia. Most of the 9/11 jihadists and suspected mastermind Osama bin Laden were from Saudi Arabia, and there is strong suspicion that 28 pages of the Senate report on its investigation of 9/11 that has still not been publicly released (notwithstanding an Obama promise to do so) contain damning evidence of wealthy Saudis’ and the Saudi government’s involvement.

The Saudis and the US had supported the Afghan Mujahideen—led by bin Laden—who bedeviled the Soviets in the 1970s and 1980s (see “A Perfect Time to Leave the Middle East”). The 9/11 attacks were neither the first nor the last time that the US government’s designs to “use” Islamic extremist group have blown up in its face. As Putin noted: “Gentlemen, the people you are dealing with are cruel but they are not dumb. They are as smart as you are. So, it’s a big question: who’s playing who here?”

This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the link above.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    but make it a meaningful vote by non voting. I call it when asked. None of the Above or A Vote of No Confidence. As for the pre-ordained final two that's not a choice that's a sentence and voting for either one is an admission of guilt. Be they the left wing of the left or the right wing of the left.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I certainly agree with you. I've voted since 1980 for candidates who said they would reduce government, cut spending, lower taxes, reduce the debt, restore individual freedom, and reduce the US footprint abroad. It hasn't happened yet, but I no longer get pissed about it. I no longer vote, either.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    All the leading and many of the trailing candidates are jumping on the "I smell votes bandwagon." No take a deep breath and remember the last 50 years of exactly the same conduct. Repeat after me. What they say and what they do are two different things. The only politician I can think off that said and did the same thing was Gingrich and the funny part is he got creamed for doing what he said he would do while those who spent their entire careers prevaricating the unadulterated truth are considered 'candidates?' What hubris is this?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Biased as it is, everyday I read in the WSJ that Americans are finally ready to get "serious" about fighting terrorism. All the leading candidates for president, Republican and Democrat, have called for escalation of our involvement in Syria, including no fly zones and boots on the ground. Hillary Clinton as well a number of intelligence figures have called on tech companies to give the government encryption keys to smart phones. Donald Trump has said we've got to do something about the Internet and mocked those who cite freedom of speech and 1st Amendment concerns. I have read a number of articles talking about balancing Constitutional rights with security. People have been saying the same thing since 9/11, and since then we have less individual freedom and more insecurity. It is true I spend most of my time writing and don't extensively canvas the "public" for its views, but I also assume that what I read must reflect the views of a substantial portion of the public. Trump and Clinton are, after all, the frontrunners.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 5 months ago
    Great article, both of them actually.

    I have 2 questions. Where are you seeing the American people calling for blood and what do you mean by throwing out the Constitution?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo