Democrats secret and not secret agents...
I've been depicting Fiorini as the perfect Democrat secret sleeper agent. That Is still more true than not. But it's only my opinion - well - not only. Now we find the second agent depicted by Mona Charon's column on Dec 9th. That's today!!!
She lays out her case in no nonsense straight forward terms. Question inow is how many of his approval number came from the left to begin with. Who? Trump the life long Democrat turned RINO. Who else as an opponent would bandaid the left back together?
http://townhall.com Mona Charon
The dictionary defines "bogeyman" as "an imaginary evil spirit, referred to typically to frighten children." Hello, Donald Trump. It's not clear whether he set out intentionally to elect Hillary Clinton, but there is little question that he could not be fulfilling the role of Republican bogeyman to greater effect.
As Commentary's Jonathan Tobin noted, during a week in which the disastrous fecklessness of President Obama and his party in the face of terrorism ought to have been Topic A, we are all talking about Trump instead. Brilliant. Tobin's point actually applies to the entire presidential contest. By rights, it should be about the Democrats' unraveling. From Obamacare to terrorism, from the economy to climate change, and from guns to free speech, progressive policies have proven deeply disappointing when not downright obtuse and dangerous. Clinton promises more of the same while trailing an oil slick of corruption in her wake. And yet swinging into the frame, week in and week out, the orange-maned billionaire bogeyman dominates the discussion.
Hell yes, Republicans are anti-Hispanic bigots, Trump (a lifelong Democrat) is supposed to confirm. Just look at the way he talked about Mexican "rapists" and vowed to build a wall that Mexico will fund.
Hell yes, Republicans want to fight a war on women. Did you hear what Trump said about Megyn Kelly and Carly Fiorina?
Hell yes, Republicans are anti-immigrant, anti-handicapped, anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim. Line 'em up and Trump will offend. Not cleverly, mind you, but crudely. Donald Trump is fond of saying that our political leaders are stupid, constantly outmaneuvered at the bargaining table by shrewder Chinese, Mexicans, and Japanese. No one can accuse him of stupidity: provided his goal is to elect Hillary Clinton.
This week, while we were still burying our dead from San Bernardino, every Republican -- rather than explaining why President Obama's refusal to fight the war on terror has led to this moment -- instead had to condemn Donald Trump's mindless proposal to keep every single Muslim out of the United States until further notice. Again, he's the perfect bogeyman.
It's not just that what he says demands condemnation. It's that it seems to give credence to the Democrats' narrative.
Personally when I listen to or read about Trump I'm reminded of the climb to power int he 20's and 30's of the last century by an ex German Army Corporal who also had a hair problem..on his lip.
She lays out her case in no nonsense straight forward terms. Question inow is how many of his approval number came from the left to begin with. Who? Trump the life long Democrat turned RINO. Who else as an opponent would bandaid the left back together?
http://townhall.com Mona Charon
The dictionary defines "bogeyman" as "an imaginary evil spirit, referred to typically to frighten children." Hello, Donald Trump. It's not clear whether he set out intentionally to elect Hillary Clinton, but there is little question that he could not be fulfilling the role of Republican bogeyman to greater effect.
As Commentary's Jonathan Tobin noted, during a week in which the disastrous fecklessness of President Obama and his party in the face of terrorism ought to have been Topic A, we are all talking about Trump instead. Brilliant. Tobin's point actually applies to the entire presidential contest. By rights, it should be about the Democrats' unraveling. From Obamacare to terrorism, from the economy to climate change, and from guns to free speech, progressive policies have proven deeply disappointing when not downright obtuse and dangerous. Clinton promises more of the same while trailing an oil slick of corruption in her wake. And yet swinging into the frame, week in and week out, the orange-maned billionaire bogeyman dominates the discussion.
Hell yes, Republicans are anti-Hispanic bigots, Trump (a lifelong Democrat) is supposed to confirm. Just look at the way he talked about Mexican "rapists" and vowed to build a wall that Mexico will fund.
Hell yes, Republicans want to fight a war on women. Did you hear what Trump said about Megyn Kelly and Carly Fiorina?
Hell yes, Republicans are anti-immigrant, anti-handicapped, anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim. Line 'em up and Trump will offend. Not cleverly, mind you, but crudely. Donald Trump is fond of saying that our political leaders are stupid, constantly outmaneuvered at the bargaining table by shrewder Chinese, Mexicans, and Japanese. No one can accuse him of stupidity: provided his goal is to elect Hillary Clinton.
This week, while we were still burying our dead from San Bernardino, every Republican -- rather than explaining why President Obama's refusal to fight the war on terror has led to this moment -- instead had to condemn Donald Trump's mindless proposal to keep every single Muslim out of the United States until further notice. Again, he's the perfect bogeyman.
It's not just that what he says demands condemnation. It's that it seems to give credence to the Democrats' narrative.
Personally when I listen to or read about Trump I'm reminded of the climb to power int he 20's and 30's of the last century by an ex German Army Corporal who also had a hair problem..on his lip.
So why should I support a lame bunch of left wing wannabe's socialists who continuously demonstrate they are lapdogs of the left? I shouldn't and i don't.
Personally I'm in favor of the military upholding and honoring their oath of office which hardly constitutes a garage door startup and is, in fact, a legal move and a required move on their part.
We never took an oath to the country nor the people nor the government but to the Constitution. If there were 'sometimes worthy' actually worth anything they wouldn't be lackeys to Republicans-In-Name-Only and goose stepping along enabling the right wing of the lef t as they support the left wing of the left them you have helped destroy liberty. For sure you weren't worth fighting for. We expected you to watch our backs only to return and found our country sold down the drain ....thanks for nothing.
Vote for your 'sometimes worthy's? What for? Same reason I wouldn't vote for a Democrat. I'm no traitor to my oath freely given still uphold without purposes of evasion. Spare me the dog an pony show and the empty campaign rhetoric. If they are worthy let them start showing it through action not empty words.
My apologies for the unseemly rant. But where better? If it was a Republican or a Democrat group it wouldn't be allowed. Not in the approved script don't you know?
.
According to a recent poll (taken before San Bernardino) a surprising 63% of Hispanics oppose the U.S. accepting Syrian Muslim refugees. So do 55% of African-Americans. So do 54% of those ages 18-29. So do 66% of women. http://www.breitbart.com/big-governme...
In a Trump vs. Hillary matchup, if immigration is still the number one issue 11 months from now, a lot of traditionally Democratic voters will likely stay home on election day or cast their vote for Trump.
I think it's funny how Republicans just assume that if it's a contest between them and Democrats, Republicans are more favorable to liberty. In my view, they're more open than Democrats in their believe that gov't should have an opinion and influence on people's personal lives.
Yes. I wonder why Democrats haven't similarly latched onto Sanders.
Or it could be she previously wanted to portray herself as a maverick who ignored conventional political wisdom, and now she realizes she only stands to gain from Trump so she helps him by appearing to take him seriously and mentioning him by name instead of "some of my opponents".
Twelve years late she was down 2x$10x52x 12 or $12,480 There was an average of four winners on the big prize a year or 48 winners. I came in 49th with $12, 480 plus interest minus taxes.
Not exactly I invested in something called penny stocks.That account was double the savings account. So no millionaire here...
Either one was better odds than Lottery or Politics. The difference. With Lottery the odds are a few million to one with an unknown conclusion. With politics the number one rigged game in the country the odds are exactly 50:50. Fifty a left wing socialist statist/corporatist will win and fifty a left wing socialist corporatist/statist will win and one hundred percent the player will lose.
All my funds left the country in 2007. The odds of them going back are zero.
You gotta play to win but you don't have to have to buck the odds of beating a stacked deck in a rigged game when other choices are available
Produce the music!!!!!!
Should your nickname be Halley7734?
That's what you get for playing with somebody else's marked deck.
Thumbs up for the music. Why not join the counter revolution and don't play with their rigged deck?
You guys are tough. I have to agree. But, I can't just stand by. Trying to make something good come out of an evil situation. I already know your reply, which is nothing good can come out of it. If whoever beats Hillary fulfills 1/4 of the promises made it will be an improvement. Unless Trump gets in.
If what you say comes to pass I'll spend my remaining years writing music.
Load more comments...