- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
I agree that holding those that loot from others in order to distribute to still others is often held up as virtuous instead of the thief that they really are. But charity itself is not evil. Even AR herself said that she had no problem with an individual that chooses of their own free will to provide charity. She didn't see it as a reason to place them above any other person.
I also don't think that the world merely shrugs at achievement. Increasingly, it depends on the political philosophy of the individual achiever. Progressive (socialist/collectivist) achievers are held up for great lauds - actors, bankers, industrialists - so long as they tout the party line. Achievers who do not spout those philosophies are scorned and ridiculed. This was less pronounced when Ms. Rand made this quote, but certainly not absent.