The Irrational Foundations of Conservatism: Edmund Burke
Edmund Burke is widely considered the founder of (modern) conservatism. His best known work is an analysis of French Revolution. His answer was reason had lead men astray and they needed to follow the course of their ancestors and eschew reason.
“He argued extensively for an appeal to authority based on collective reasoning and organic reform while rejecting the use of abstract principles and individual reason in establishing mass rule.”
There is no such thing as collective reasoning. Conservatism is an attack on reason, the Enlightenment, the scientific revolution, Locke and the founding principles of the United States. It is time that conservatives admit that their whole philosophy is based on irrationalism.
“He argued extensively for an appeal to authority based on collective reasoning and organic reform while rejecting the use of abstract principles and individual reason in establishing mass rule.”
There is no such thing as collective reasoning. Conservatism is an attack on reason, the Enlightenment, the scientific revolution, Locke and the founding principles of the United States. It is time that conservatives admit that their whole philosophy is based on irrationalism.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
we do want to improve things by every means available,
in my humble opinion, just as you say. -- j
.
.
Etc. Etc. Etc. Who do I like? Truth to tell. His or Her first name is General or Colonel and his other names are Martial Law if that's what it takes but it must be above all things legal.
Who would I rather see running? None of the Above for the entire group so far mentioned. But in a form of guerrilla warfare I'm pushing the notion of Carly F. as a way to defuse the Hillary Bomb with Jindal as the VP to bring in a huge amount of votes that otherwise truly will be flushed down the Socialist toilet.
Think about it it's the most win win win scenario I can devise the others are just the right wing of the left bought and paid for. So's Carly but she's the camel's nose and Jindal is the camel's rump.
He adds votes big time and more than compensates for the Hillary lovers now she has turned her back on the Progressives and they will presumably to BS Ha Ha.
the rest post again if would like to hear why that is a win win for the Democrats win for the Republicans and a big WIN for the citizens far better than voting for evil we use her as the Devil's Advocate to gain access but the price is Jindal for VP - or someone like him.
I combined a lot of past studies in different area but the key is "Man's rational mind is his/her sole means of gaining knowledge, survival and happiness. The lesson of Objectivism. Bottom of the Preface in Objectivism in One Lesson. Why? Because it objectively examines all possibilities and determines what works and what does not work. I have enough faith and enough knowledge of history to know the the socialist fascist system does not work and never has.
There is always an out, an escape hatch, a twist, a re-definition or a new metaphor or maybe for them methapor. Spin is just another word for deceit and in that effort ..ha ha ha they are also failures. But they'll swallow the Carly Ploy in a DC second cause their asses are on the line and they know it. Hillary figured that out already and that's why she's heading back to the comfort zone in the center of the left.
And that's how you start a counter-revolution never refer to it as anything else nor as a violence prone or illegal action in any way. It is none of those. Gotta run it's time rip they a new orifice in my on going series.
One last thought. The Jindal Vote ....and it might end up including Webb...The "Consent Withdrawn Party."
But, really, what is your alternative ?
It's a sham and it's something heavily favored by the likes of Nancy Pelosillyni. So if they are supporting Comrade Lube Job they are by word and deed to the left of most RINOS. Trump is no conservative by any definition. He's what you call a looter or a moocher. That leaves Rubio and the known Rinos to choose from in labeling them Conservatives and of course the top tier as RINOS are also not conservatives That leaves Rubio He'll go down next the others have to wait on the Bimbo Brigade.
"Conservatism" is like a sticky ball or Velcro. it's easy to stick something to it without having to explain why.
One of the problems with the conservative label is the implied connection with theology. Belief in religious principals is more subjective than objective and as such it requires a very different thought process than say economics or physics. As long as the conservative movement retains the dichotomy of subjective and objective reasoning it will be at war with its self. That makes it an easy target.
Both Liberal and Conservative current strains of American politicians seem to favor an Executive with far more power than delineated in the Constitution, so it would appear both mainstream political parties have adopted Burke's "Hobbesean" position. The concepts of government promoted by Locke and Montesquieu have been abandoned by modern power brokers of political influence, primarily because concentrated power is easier to steer than distributed power.
I think a lot of people label themselves as conservatives because they think the alternative is to be a modern liberal. When anyone asks , I label myself an individualist. I am still learning about Objectivism, a lot from the Objectivists here, and I thank you.
I read the first half and hope to go back to the second half and the other article.
I'd read Burke in college. This makes me remember a little and think I'd get something different out of it reading it at age 40 vs age 20.