That's up to you. It's not a group thing it's an individual choice unlike social altruism...or are there social hypocrites? Institutionalized liars? Say one thing do another....ah yes...politicians, preachers, teachers, car sales staff, and the media. Value for the group less than zero.

What rule requires one to not be hypocritical? Isn't it just another value that can be held same as altruism?

You make my point....nothing matters without an external source of meaning.

I'll do you one better...everything is nihilism without God.

Without God to set meaning, how is any immutable meaning determined?

Isn't enjoyment only a value if one were to define it as such? To one, enjoyment may be devalued while others value it.

Regardless of the above, how can morality be defined within a system of subjectively such as Objectivism developed within man himself? One man's morality is another man's immorality correct?