All it takes is a few less votes for school budgets listing failure to produce an acceptable product.as the reason. Normally only those with kids in school support budgets saying..wait until mine are graduated. My answer. Graduated to what?

That's the point. You can't and they have a perfect, "You know what I mean?" escape route from responsibility.

I guarantee you can find one person in the world that will be offended by anything I say or do. This goes for the oh so worshipped "Millenials."

Therefore, they cannot live consistently with their social philosophy of how community should function.

So what should they do then?

There was a time in the world when those who were this inept and incorrigible were removed from society to protect it.

Before they are products of public schools, they are products of their parents who sent them there.

Then you have to deal with the philosophy of parenting those parents utilized....oh boy...what a rabbit hole.

There are so many problems with the title of this post it is hard to begin to address. I will provide some food for thought:

1) Define "offend"
2) Define "speech"
3) Define "minorities"
4) Define "ban"

See, my point is here boys and girls is that in today's speech, definitions change with the wind; therefore, how can any discussion take place?

"Socialism is stupidism." Polish dissident Stefan Kisielweski was thrown in jail by communist authorities for saying this. Today's college campuses becoming more and more authoritarian.

Members of Congress both House and Senate. 535 nine supremes pres and vp. 546. leaves 120 for State Governors, DNC RNC leaders, M2F Media. and a few others that are in then out of power. total can be made by some serious re-defining to 666. Nothing devilishly frightening it's quite contrived. but close enough to be made possible. Something to scare chldren with who look for monsters under the bed or in the closet with lights out. And don't forget the Billionaire Boys Club

No it isn't OK. It's racist or sexist or bigotry.

The easiest form of expressing attitude is
'ignore.' The old phrase from England was 'Send them to Coventry' a form of complete ostracizing.

It's contempt at it's best.

My best performance was to judge when I was on the jury. He thought I
was asleep I knew his brain was in somnolence.

When I decided to recognize he was speaking to me as an individual I recited the last five minutes or so of court room activity. the court recorder agreed. The judge went back to sleep. The rest of us continued the trial.Had he asked me was I showing contempt and had I answered I would probably have spent the weekend in jail.

Or in ordinary cases where they are more than tempted not to follow it?

That's another way of saying explain your position.

It is if you are a racist.

I thought so too. Rather proud of that piece of work. Kinda like climbing Everest and trying to explain why. I don't know because the challenge was there?

Can you figure out the significance of the numbers?