Works for me. Now that begs a different question. If they refused to vote in both the Pres and the VP it goes to a choice of House or Senate Leader. OR can the electoral college choose some one else or two someone elses and if so assuming constitutional requirements are met would they have othere restrictions such as same party as the two tossed in the clink in obedience to popular vote ....or not. Same thing if later on act of succession is needed. Same party or could an inhouse revolution put someone like Pelosi in place of someone like....hell almost anyone?

Here's another idea or thought. Pres and VP elected. Prior to inauguaration or hand over day Pres arrested on felony charges, now in fact being investigated, the Libby Law. VP who ever moves up then also gets arrested on the same charges. It's now a rico conspiracy. Act of Succession kicks in but no cabinet is appointed for after inauguration. that leaves Speaker of the House and President of the Senate. Only one who chooses his own VP. That isn't an immediate requirement we've spent almost 20% I think it is of our time as a nation without a VP. No matter the next guy in line is the new speaker or President Por Tempore.

Wrong it only means you get the same type with he same stripes the two are hand selected and force fed and all from the same government over people belief system. the antidote is much harder it takes a real landslide majority of someone other than the two choices of the left. That's their ace in the hole and it comes from tolerating a one party two faced system.

Two choices a massive no doubt no BS landslide of not voting at all. That's the under vote and it's significance is the loss of confidence and withdrawal of consent.

Second is a massive overwhelming flood of write ins for the exact same individual. Too big too fail amounts.

The third doesn't bear mentioning. We use ballots not bullets.

The fourth is the military upholding their oath of office.

Anarchist are the extremist of the right. Totalitarian despotism etc the extremists of the left.

The left is Government over people all using small f fascism or total control of everything.

The right of center using the constitution as center is Citizen over government as temporary employees. Very few republicans as most are government over citizen types.

The center according to the left is there center Rinos to the their center's right and Democrats starting on the left of their center.

Depends on which definition of center you use.

Libertarians are hard to figure. They wander on both sides of Constitutional Center depending on who is speaking for them. The recent post on Ayn Rand and the undocumented claim of lying to immigration is an example.

Not many people live right of center and most of them are firmly attached to the Constitution or some similar belief feature freedom, independence, free speech, etc. etc. etc. things not much taught in schools anymore. Objectivists probably or even mostly it's not really a party platform. but independent thinkers for sure. the rest is easy to figure out when you match actions with words and they don't add up.

A pardon may be couched in such wording as to include any and all conducts and action that may or may not at a later time be construed as a felony, misdemeanor or misdeed. Blanket pardon.

Diudnt' the come in twin sets? Bobble Bubba and Bobble Broomhilda?

You are learning! That's a good thing. Except in this case The Emperor has ALL the clothes.

Ah yes....but are they rogue? The only laws forbidding them from voting any way they want are state laws and as we've seen those don't count.

If state laws counted Congressional delegates to the federal government could be recalled. One of the powers not delegated. But they can't and that means....states don't count.

The next step is winner take all nationwide