Adding to my appreciation of Going Galt
Posted by Abaco 9 years, 8 months ago to Philosophy
So, last night I'm talking with an activist who is trying to orchestrate a movement against a recent law in California - a law that forces medical treatment. There are similar laws being cooked up across the nation now and this lady, along with many others I know, seem to think we can just rise up and stop it. I don't think so. I think the public actually wants forced medicine. They're ready for it, they want it, and they're gonna get it. Eventually, I'll watch from a quiet, seaside village far away. But, her argument in favor of fighting caught my attention - because I think it's flawed. She made the point, "Only 1.5% of the citizens stood up to England and we won the revolution!" I don't see the comparison. For one, we were here and England's over there. The citizens of England at that time were settled in with having their asses handed to them all the time. That's what I see here. Anyway...I'm just venting here. Thoughts?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
The Old Man laughed at him. "Ten years? I'll be delighted to last ten more years."
He didn't get the test. He told me that fell into the "better off not knowing" category as far as he was concerned. His doc agreed.
I had heard the argument before that only 1-2% were active and never really believed it. Beyond that, the differences in the situation are too many to take it seriously. It's not a matter of whether or not Colonists fought back. This would be like the British citizens fighting back. Probably wouldn't have gone too well. Look at them now. No thanks...
If you look at what's happening in Vermont, where doctors are being pushed either into large systems or quitting - that's the future. Like in many things, the trend is toward more centralized control. Goodbye incentives...
Regarding separating from England, my understanding is at least a third favored it.