Letter to liberals from my e-mail
we received this today and thought that it might be
worth sharing:::
Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives,
socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters:
We have stuck together since the late 1950s for the sake
of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has
made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated
each other for many years for the sake of future generations,
but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever
agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly
terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable
differences and go our own way.
Here is our separation agreement:
Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass,
each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but
I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement.
After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective
representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both
sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
We don't like redistributive taxes, so you can keep them.
You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.
Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops,
the NRA and the military.
We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and the coal mines, and
you can go with wind, solar and bio-diesel.
You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. You
are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle
big enough to move all three of them.
We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical
companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street.
You can have your beloved lifelong welfare-dwellers, food
stamps, homeless (except for the Vets), homeboys, hippies,
druggies and illegal aliens.
We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey-moms, greedy CEOs
and rednecks.
We'll keep Bill O'Reilly and Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood.
You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right
to invade and hammer places which threaten us.
You can have the peaceniks and war protesters.
When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help
provide them security.
We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.
You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political
correctness and Shirley MacLaine. You can also have the U.N. –
but we will no longer be paying the bill.
We'll keep the SUV's, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars.
You can take every Volt and Leaf you can find.
You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors.
We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem."
I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine," "I'd Like to Teach
the World to Sing," "Kum Ba Ya" or "We Are the World."
We'll practice trickle-down economics and you can continue to
give trickle up poverty your best shot.
Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name
and our flag.
Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other
like-minded liberal and conservative patriots, and if you do not
agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you
might think about which one of us will need whose help
in 15 years.
Sincerely,
John J. Wall
Law Student, and an American
P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin & Charlie
Sheen, Barbara Streisand and (Hanoi) Jane Fonda with you.
P.P.S. And you won't have to press 1 for English
when you call our country.
-- j, prompted by jlc
.
worth sharing:::
Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives,
socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters:
We have stuck together since the late 1950s for the sake
of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has
made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated
each other for many years for the sake of future generations,
but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever
agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly
terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable
differences and go our own way.
Here is our separation agreement:
Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass,
each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but
I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement.
After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective
representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both
sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
We don't like redistributive taxes, so you can keep them.
You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.
Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops,
the NRA and the military.
We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and the coal mines, and
you can go with wind, solar and bio-diesel.
You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. You
are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle
big enough to move all three of them.
We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical
companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street.
You can have your beloved lifelong welfare-dwellers, food
stamps, homeless (except for the Vets), homeboys, hippies,
druggies and illegal aliens.
We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey-moms, greedy CEOs
and rednecks.
We'll keep Bill O'Reilly and Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood.
You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right
to invade and hammer places which threaten us.
You can have the peaceniks and war protesters.
When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help
provide them security.
We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.
You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political
correctness and Shirley MacLaine. You can also have the U.N. –
but we will no longer be paying the bill.
We'll keep the SUV's, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars.
You can take every Volt and Leaf you can find.
You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors.
We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem."
I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine," "I'd Like to Teach
the World to Sing," "Kum Ba Ya" or "We Are the World."
We'll practice trickle-down economics and you can continue to
give trickle up poverty your best shot.
Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name
and our flag.
Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other
like-minded liberal and conservative patriots, and if you do not
agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you
might think about which one of us will need whose help
in 15 years.
Sincerely,
John J. Wall
Law Student, and an American
P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin & Charlie
Sheen, Barbara Streisand and (Hanoi) Jane Fonda with you.
P.P.S. And you won't have to press 1 for English
when you call our country.
-- j, prompted by jlc
.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 5.
Too bad this couldn't happen because the useful idiot sector of the liberal sham would truly believe they had to save us from ourselves.
Not exactly the same thing but 150 years ago something was tried in a similar manor. The South simply wanted to go its own way but the Federal Government was determined to kill them all rather than letting that happen. Contrary to popular belief, the South losing the war was the biggest blow to freedom this Country ever experienced. Most people do not understand that because they are taught it was all about slavery, when of course it was not. Slavery was an issue that the south was wrong on (and I think would have eventually changed) but the war never would have happened over slavery. It was because the South was tired of being controlled on everything, particularly the economic issues. If the South had won, the precedent would be set that States are free. As it is, States are totally subservient to the Feds and have no real freedom or control at all!
Old dino is a Bama boy.
Unfortunately, the libs want to control everybody.
Why?
They see themselves as our elite more than equal betters..
.
After all the unwanted calls I have been getting over the past few years, I wish I had that option!
which started this nation on the right track! . may the best
person win, in their area of expertise, and let them exchange
values at will !!! -- j
.
It doesn't have to be along the so-called left/right ideological lines, but I would be okay with that. Following the Constitution, they'd have to have free trade with one another, but they could have their own rules. One side would be high-tech developers making Facebook, Google, Epic, and so one, biotech companies, nano-tech, alternative energy. Their schools could focus on creative and critical thinking. Their gov't could focus on charity-sounding programs like children's nutrition and job training. The other side could have the mining, paper mills, factories, agriculture, and so on. They would have schools that teach tradition, memorization, and reading/writing from Bible tracks, all the things people needed for the jobs of the industrial revolution in the 18th and 19th century. Their programs would focus on keeping the poor and desperate segregated and strict legal penalites to deal with them they turn violent, programs that in no way smack of alms.
Both sides could carry on about how they will be so succesful in their own areas of interest. But they wouldn't fight. The liberal areas would still need to buy coal, paper, and textiles from the rightwing places. The rightwing places would still need new medical imaging/treatment systems, Google/Apple/Facebook products/service, and so on.
I don't care to predict who would be more successful. It's not a constest. It's about leaving people alone to live as they want to live.