

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Yes it can be used for several other things to make it easier for them.
I understand the meaning's of 'Mandatory', 'Misunderstood' and 'misused'.
While it is true that most American's misunderstand the Social Security and Federal Income tax...I do not.
I suggest you study up on the Social Security matter and remove yourself from those that are lacking in the knowledge needed to understand your rights as a citizen of the republic.
I wish you well in your studies...we need more people of knowledge to stop this slide down the slope we are currently on.
As I recall they had their own laws. In our case....hmmmmmmm maybe the gulch was allegorical,
However, it could be that rainman was referring to the fact that when "renowned", in the public eye (and under government scrutiny) individuals mysteriously vanished that an all out manhunt was instigated by the government officials and rewards placed on their heads. Could it be that rainman questions this point of being excessively vulnerable if stopped by officials or someone looking for the reward $$?
Some "renowned", like Francisco, did not officially disappear and were not wanted (until very end) so being stopped while driving, etc., a moot point. Others like Ragnar were wanted by the government officials for crimes against the State and would have to travel incognito (someone else's name and car registration). But as time went on the government cracked down on "disappearing producers", hence they could not freely come and go, driving or not, unless under an assumed identity in case they were questioned for documents.
That brings us to Galt... the audacity of Rand, and therefore Galt, was ingeniously portrayed in his "hiding in plain site", even while keeping his own name. Who would have ever imagined or believed it to be true had he been actually stopped by any official. But nonetheless a pronounced risk had he been driving and intercepted.
I think that rainman needs to view this in the time it was written, pre-computers and non interconnecting agencies much less able to track down vehicles and connect the dots like we have today. So the reality of this happening would have been greatly reduced at that time.
they couldn't afford a swatter in props department. just think of the possibilities. Bruce Lee method, Jack Bauer method. The creative mind must have boggled and gone agog!
Not having any plate would be far more attention grabbing. Whereas having the plate, a viewer thinks, ok from Colorado, no big deal.
In the shipping industry we had the forerunner Transport Workers Identification Card. I had a chance to see the contents of the chip. It did not have underwear size. But it did have fingerprints, blood type and a space for DNA....and like the story on the 100 bill strips - could be detected.
As the song goes....It's Just A Matter of Time.
You mght want to check definition of mandatory and go read REAL ID Act. If one of those you mentioned doesn't want to invest in a chip reader that's their choice. You don't get one.
Sincerely,
xxx-xx-xxxx
AKA
Michael Aarethun
I wanted something more snazzy like the folks in Anthem. I feel cheated.
Now back to the License plate, in this case it is only as a distinguisher not as a registration IMHO
Load more comments...