This has been debated extensively here. My personal opinion is that changing cast members brings a type of "everyman" feel to the trilogy. These various characters could be any of us. Just my theory and I'm sticking with it.
>My personal opinion is that changing cast members brings a type of "everyman" feel to the trilogy.
Yep. And changing screenwriters and directors brings a type of cracker-barrel, anyone-can-do-this feel to the trilogy.
Of course, changing above-the-line and below-the-line cast and crew completely effs up little details such as unity of storytelling, continuity of style, and overall intelligibility for the audience.
Part III will be nice to see. But I do believe that a prequel that shows the growth and development of the characters and businesses will be a blockbuster and lead to even more interest in the 3 parts.
Watching off set interviews with the actors added a lot to my understanding of why they were picked, except for Francisco, I think he is gong to be a disappointment.
I do not understand how the production team is going to "make over" the 20 year difference in age between the actors portraying Dagny, Galt and then Francisco. Gunna need a lot of paint.But hey, I just an engineer.
There HAD to be somebody else available in the age group and in character. I don't know, I just can't see a guy my age up on the roof top of a factory building with pistols in each hand (the Reardon Steel riot) unless that gets left out. I can't imagine that.
Yep. And changing screenwriters and directors brings a type of cracker-barrel, anyone-can-do-this feel to the trilogy.
Of course, changing above-the-line and below-the-line cast and crew completely effs up little details such as unity of storytelling, continuity of style, and overall intelligibility for the audience.
But as long as you like, that's what counts.