Purchasing Atlantis from a debt-ridden country, but with autonomy built into the purchasing agreement?
Many of us, led by db and Kh, have been debating the subject of immigration. I would love to see America get back to her pre-1913 roots, but for numerous reasons, I think that such effort is a waste of time and resources.
Freedomforall, in response to my suggestion that America sell its "government land" to pay down at least part of its debt, asked if such a sale could include the right to secede.
That prompted me to consider the possibility of buying land from debt-ridden countries (some of which are experiencing hyperinflation) at rockbottom prices, with autonomy being required as a condition of purchase. As debt piles up all around the world, there will be some opportunities along these lines for vultures like myself to come scavenge the debris. Perhaps an island off the Venezuelan coast with some nearby oil? In our previous discussions about a physical Gulch, our premise had been to buy land that the nearby government would largely ignore based on its track record of freedom (or lack thereof). That may be the wrong premise to work from. Why should we not provide a value for value trade in their time of desperation? The question then is how long do we wait. The price for the land in such desperate countries should continue to go down, but the conditions in our own countries might get bad enough that we could get trapped by 10-289.
The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Thailand are working toward the development of micronations off their coasts. Interestingly, Google is developing the first such island. The linked article describes some of the first work along these lines.
Freedomforall, in response to my suggestion that America sell its "government land" to pay down at least part of its debt, asked if such a sale could include the right to secede.
That prompted me to consider the possibility of buying land from debt-ridden countries (some of which are experiencing hyperinflation) at rockbottom prices, with autonomy being required as a condition of purchase. As debt piles up all around the world, there will be some opportunities along these lines for vultures like myself to come scavenge the debris. Perhaps an island off the Venezuelan coast with some nearby oil? In our previous discussions about a physical Gulch, our premise had been to buy land that the nearby government would largely ignore based on its track record of freedom (or lack thereof). That may be the wrong premise to work from. Why should we not provide a value for value trade in their time of desperation? The question then is how long do we wait. The price for the land in such desperate countries should continue to go down, but the conditions in our own countries might get bad enough that we could get trapped by 10-289.
The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Thailand are working toward the development of micronations off their coasts. Interestingly, Google is developing the first such island. The linked article describes some of the first work along these lines.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Price for conquest will have to be high before this could be done without that sword of damocles hanging overhead.
Partnering with a company with clout, like Google or Apple would help.
Once you pay Danegeld, how do you get rid of the Dane?
were buying rightfully belonged to that government
you were buying it from in the first place? Or did
that government confiscate it from somebody else
first? And then would not that victim be the rightful
owner, and not you?
Those of us who have properties will begin a "time-share" Gulch where we can unite and teach for a week or two (or however long the stream-of-thought can last).
Then it will have time to properly grow into a "net" of sorts where skills and thought are shared and proselytized.
It will eventually become massive if we can last that long.
No His mind is not for rent,
To any God or government.
Rush - "Tom Sawyer"
Regarding cost, drones and small size are surprisingly cheap.
On a side note I'd argue one of the earliest forms of small combat drones were the San Antonio Bat Bombs of WWII. ;) As to the scale, I'm a very strategic thinking person so I can't help but look at the long term, then figure out how to get there. I left the space assets out for at least some sense of brevity. Given the piracy issue, there is a reasonable expectation that you could start relatively small as a naval export service (yeah, I giggled when I wrote that) and leverage that into a larger capability. Plus, when The Great Shrug came, pulling the escorts back to serve as a defensive navy would certainly add to the problems of looters looting looters.
Not to mention if you ever wanted to enact repossessions you know all of the sea trade routes... ;)
Edit: additionally modern carriers also carries a significant contingent of landing forces - something we wouldn't really need. Smaller carriers are a compound saving when designed for them. Smaller means less mass which means either less propulsion/power requirements or more maps budget can be allocated to defensive mass such as plating or active countermeasures.
Ultimately I think for a nation such as we're contemplating remote capabilities such as (initially RPV) drones are a primary resource. However, current and near-term tech is still low enough we'd need to either dramatically improve it or still have humans in the field.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/20...
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/sc...
The Project Panther reference is in part because Florida Tech's mascot is the panther.
This first appeared in my local newspaper 6 days ago.
Sometimes you don't need to rely on "new" - just "more effective". ;)
Plus it would give us access to an increasingly crucial sphere of influence.
Load more comments...