14

Purchasing Atlantis from a debt-ridden country, but with autonomy built into the purchasing agreement?

Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 8 months ago to Government
137 comments | Share | Flag

Many of us, led by db and Kh, have been debating the subject of immigration. I would love to see America get back to her pre-1913 roots, but for numerous reasons, I think that such effort is a waste of time and resources.

Freedomforall, in response to my suggestion that America sell its "government land" to pay down at least part of its debt, asked if such a sale could include the right to secede.

That prompted me to consider the possibility of buying land from debt-ridden countries (some of which are experiencing hyperinflation) at rockbottom prices, with autonomy being required as a condition of purchase. As debt piles up all around the world, there will be some opportunities along these lines for vultures like myself to come scavenge the debris. Perhaps an island off the Venezuelan coast with some nearby oil? In our previous discussions about a physical Gulch, our premise had been to buy land that the nearby government would largely ignore based on its track record of freedom (or lack thereof). That may be the wrong premise to work from. Why should we not provide a value for value trade in their time of desperation? The question then is how long do we wait. The price for the land in such desperate countries should continue to go down, but the conditions in our own countries might get bad enough that we could get trapped by 10-289.

The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Thailand are working toward the development of micronations off their coasts. Interestingly, Google is developing the first such island. The linked article describes some of the first work along these lines.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The big problem is that every intelligence agency in the world worthy of the name. Starting of course with the NSA would demand access. They already do this with the USA infrastructure.

    Price for conquest will have to be high before this could be done without that sword of damocles hanging overhead.

    Partnering with a company with clout, like Google or Apple would help.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 9 years, 8 months ago
    Would you, in such a case, admit that the land you
    were buying rightfully belonged to that government
    you were buying it from in the first place? Or did
    that government confiscate it from somebody else
    first? And then would not that victim be the rightful
    owner, and not you?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 9 years, 8 months ago
    I think that this will be a hierarchical learning experience/evolution.
    Those of us who have properties will begin a "time-share" Gulch where we can unite and teach for a week or two (or however long the stream-of-thought can last).
    Then it will have time to properly grow into a "net" of sorts where skills and thought are shared and proselytized.
    It will eventually become massive if we can last that long.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Reminds me of something I heard long ago...The Mouse that Roared. Isn't it about that?...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I recommend the following:

    No His mind is not for rent,
    To any God or government.

    Rush - "Tom Sawyer"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We would have to put a musical lock on the fence. I wonder what the access code might be!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed. We also need to adapt to use our site advantages as the Lunies did in Moon Is A Harsh Mistress. Until we have a location and can analyse its specific advantages we can only speculate. That analysis must be a part of the process when deciding between sites,
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks, B5 was the only exemplar which came to mind on swarm tactics in a visual format. In my opinion B5 is the best Sci-Fi to ever hit the small screen. I love SW and ST, but the moment I saw how B5's defenses and tactics were employed, I knew it was something special. ;)

    Regarding cost, drones and small size are surprisingly cheap.

    On a side note I'd argue one of the earliest forms of small combat drones were the San Antonio Bat Bombs of WWII. ;) As to the scale, I'm a very strategic thinking person so I can't help but look at the long term, then figure out how to get there. I left the space assets out for at least some sense of brevity. Given the piracy issue, there is a reasonable expectation that you could start relatively small as a naval export service (yeah, I giggled when I wrote that) and leverage that into a larger capability. Plus, when The Great Shrug came, pulling the escorts back to serve as a defensive navy would certainly add to the problems of looters looting looters.

    Not to mention if you ever wanted to enact repossessions you know all of the sea trade routes... ;)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The primary effect of carriers is to project power and thus a keystone in conquest, true. However, In defense they are a stand-off tool: extend your defenses. That said, if you leverage drones they don't have to be as large (and hence vulnerable) as today's carriers are.

    Edit: additionally modern carriers also carries a significant contingent of landing forces - something we wouldn't really need. Smaller carriers are a compound saving when designed for them. Smaller means less mass which means either less propulsion/power requirements or more maps budget can be allocated to defensive mass such as plating or active countermeasures.

    Ultimately I think for a nation such as we're contemplating remote capabilities such as (initially RPV) drones are a primary resource. However, current and near-term tech is still low enough we'd need to either dramatically improve it or still have humans in the field.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Disagree on building carriers for defense, but like your thinking on use of marine and arial drones. Carriers are for sea powers and are a target to today's technology, especially the drone forces and sub-marine attacks. (How many million drones could be built for the cost of a carrier?) Carriers are for countries like the US, China, and Russia who plan to invade other peoples and have to take their air power to that locale. Just very expensive targets for a people that wants to be left alone and reinvests profits into defensive R and D with old tech like carriers as a prime target. (Just my opinion, and I do not claim to be an expert on current carrier tech.) Love your new tech ideas for stealth undersea defense ops.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My university just hired Buzz Aldrin to lead a new initiative to colonize Mars. It is a lot of fun teaching the future rocket engineers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I hope so too, Herb. This will take me at least a few years, probably a decade before I'm ready to make this kind of leap.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That is one of the best things that I have ever heard, and I've lived long enough to have heard a lot. I just hope to be around long enough to see it become a reality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 8 months ago
    For a while I followed the attempts to create "New Utopia" by building an island nation-state in the Caribbean on a shallow-depth shoal. The backers of this idea thought they were going to be creating a completely independent state, but came to the realization that the shoal was located within the 200-mile commercial interest zone of one or more Central American countries. I don't know why they didn't proceed with the idea of negotiating separability agreements, as suggested here, but that seemed to have killed the idea. New Utopia was going to be a principality, modeled somewhat on the lines of Monaco, and they didn't seem to address the idea of building a defense system, preferring to contract security services from existing private companies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hmm, depending on where the island is, why not first-class space launch capability or even, dare we dream?, a space elevator. If we are as bold as we think, as productive as we expect to be, and situated right, we should be able to do the presently only-imaginable much faster than anyone else (assuming a suitable location).

    Plus it would give us access to an increasingly crucial sphere of influence.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo