The worst genocides of the 20th and 21st Century
Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 9 months ago to History
One of the things I really can't stand, is when MSM and other uninformed people accuse the U.S. Military of genocide, merciless killing of children, etc. For lack of better words: That's a crock of BS.
For those who aren't afraid of the truth, here's a great site which lists (approximately, not all records are 100% accurate) how many died by the hands of Communists, Socialists (Hitler for anyone under the age of 25), Muslims & other NON-US Military forces.
For those who aren't afraid of the truth, here's a great site which lists (approximately, not all records are 100% accurate) how many died by the hands of Communists, Socialists (Hitler for anyone under the age of 25), Muslims & other NON-US Military forces.
SOURCE URL: http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html
It is strange that such a racist strategy is passionately supported by minorities, whom I can only guess envision themselves as being part of that small remaining component of humanity. The horrible truth is that the purveyors of Eugenics are usually religious adherents of Aryan superiority, believing that the small remnant of humanity will be dominated by white, blue-eyed, blonde Aryan super-beings.
We need to include this racist as well.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1...
Of course, genetic engineering may result in some quirks, like a family of mostly black genetic background deciding it would be fun to have a little white redhead in the family.
I doubt that they will have the freedom to do so. If the Government is in control of this, all children will look alike - BO if its a boy and Michele if its a girl:-)
Top of the list: 1,283,710,000 - Number of babies murdered worldwide since 1980
2nd on the list: 57,083,000 - Number of babies murdered in the US since Roe v Wade in 1973
If you're not absolutely disgusted by THOSE numbers...
It's the old dyslexia kicking in. Whenever I think I have it beaten, it rears its ugly head. Runs in the family. Several cousins have it also. One of whom is an English/Theater Arts prof!
http://www.straightlinelogic.com/straigh...
It is also not true that all of these atrocities were genocide. the definition of genocide is:
"1. murder of entire ethnic group: the systematic killing of all the people from a national, ethnic, or religious group, or an attempt to do this" (From the Bing Dictionary)
Some of these acts are not genocide but mass Murder by direct or indirect means.
I know, picky picky
Very useful.
The convention defines genocide as any act committed with the idea of destroying in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. This includes such acts as:
1. Killing members of the group
2.Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
3.Deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to physically destroy the group (the whole group or even part of the group)
4.Forcefully transferring children of the group to another group
The convention declares that there is no immunity from being prosecuted for committing genocide: those found guilty of genocide will be punished for their crime, regardless of whether they are or were legally constituted ruler, public officials, or private individuals.
It's one thing to sit around and define "genocide" and than quite disgustingly passively ensure the conditions for such atrocities occur & then yank on the U.S. military chain to stop it, but only after x-number of thousands die first.
By the way, the UN Charter violates the U.S. Constitution 15 different ways. Were you aware of that? Just FYI.