He is a fellow socialist, like all modern Dems, who advocate living off of Other People's Money. Plus, some low info voters may think it is a new sequel to the movie "Weekend at Bernie's."

A party can nominate anyone it likes, as long as he agrees.

Good one. :-)

The little old socialist paid the right people? with other peoples money I might add.

The other day I thought of a T shirt slogan in this regard: It addresses the entropy that plaques socialism...
HEY! Bernie, we've already run out of other people's money!

And Romney as a Republican did exactly the same thing for Mass. before the current socialist. And Kasich as a Republican jumped right on board the vast expansion of welfare/Medicare with the current socialist. And Reagan as a Republican Conservative granted Amnesty to some 8 million illegal aliens, 30 years before the current socialist.

the DNC chairwoman Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz cannot
name the difference between a socialist and a Democrat ...
so, in parallel, they can't name the difference between
this Independent and a Democrat!!! -- j
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seldw...

And they made us an offer we canna refuse. :-(

That's why my thinking has become so perverted that I find myself hoping poor bumbling Biden decides to run.. It would give Obama a real reason to not back Mrs. Clinton in retaliation for the way she and Bill treated Obama, and it would siphon votes away. I am as conservative an Objectivist American voter as I can be, but I would rather see anyone now running , from either party, in our oval office than Ms. Clinton. Sorry, but that's how destructive I think she would be.. We will eventually survive the amateur Obama but he does not have the meanness and dishonesty of a woman as practiced as Ms. Clinton.

Ohiocrossroads I agree but as I, personally ,not officially, see the problem with Mrs. William Clinton, is the women voters, They are obsessed with having female leader no matter how distrustful or un.accomplished just like the identity voters of 2008 with their "change artist".

As Carly Fiorina so easily demonstrates there are plenty of qualified women and insisting on rewarding Bill's wife for the shame he caused her with bimbos is totally self destructive.

Women fought like wildcats to get the vote and it is so juvenile to waste it on someone as devious as Mrs. Clinton,,,,, You can do better if you want a president to be proud of....Taking revenge on the men and the country just to give away the office to an underserving female is beneath America and the freedom of voting.

Oops. I see that now. My eyes are going. I would say Eric Holder was Sonny and Elizabeth Warren is Michael.

It's actually trumplione... Like Corleone. Both powerful "dons"... Capisce?

I just wonder who are playing Michael and Sonny... Heh heh heh...

Useful idiots

Your personal party affiliation has no bearing. YOU could run for donkey nomination if you felt like it

Definitely.

I think FDR laid the groundwork for the merging of the two..

During the last election, she actually said she would resign as sec of state IF Obama was re-elected. I thought that was an interesting statement of dislike on her part. No wonder he doesnt like her

It is now. Obama saw to that.

From what I read the Obamas hate her as well. They can drip out damaging info and torpedo her campaign. I would enjoy seeing her go down.

Socialist Democrat is a redundancy.

I think this is the tip of the iceberg with Hillary. I am getting the impression that her reincarnation of Nixon attitudes have hidden a LOT of dirt over the years, and maybe this one is the straw that broke the camels back. I say she should pull out now and not waste money. She is never getting elected.

+1

You have me thinking of a socialist circus tent that leaks on jackasses every time it rains.

+1 for the smile it gave me

I remember those commercials so fondly LOL