Jimmy Kimmel on the Killing of Cecil the Lion

Posted by LetsShrug 9 years, 9 months ago to Culture
280 comments | Share | Flag

This is what we've become? He who has the biggest public emotional reaction wins??
Not to mention the witch hunt that is now in hot pursuit.
Jimmy Kimmel... Jackass.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -3
    Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Again, you demonstrate your lack of historical knowledge. At the time of the signing, more than half of colonies had state religion that varied by state.

    The First Amendment was written specifically to say Congress shall make no law. Writings by the Founding Fathers confirm this was done to prevent a federal church, not at the state level. In fact, they assumed states would likely continue to have state religions and that would be left to the states (see the 10th Amendment).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed I do!
    ...but this zealot is a poor example of supporting anyone's rights but his own.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Tonight the O'Riley Factor was all huff and puff pointing out about how little time the lame stream media was spending on the latest PP scandal in comparison to crying long and hard over the lion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah... this post got hijacked in three different directions...might be a new record. Sign of a good post? Ugh I don't know.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by DancingDon 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    if we are having a rational discussion, then please leave the Bible, the Quran, and any various scratchings on ancient temple walls out of it.
    2. I fail to understand the meaning of your question ".....man not man?!?". Are we switching to Platonic Forms now?.
    3. I would be interested to read your development on how having the capacity to reason leads to a state of "dominance". Maybe a bit of Spencerian social Darwinism raising its ugly head here? My understanding of AR's position is that a man's rational faculty, his mind, is his primary survival tool and learning how to use his mind and then the environment to best facilitate this - survival & successful living qua reasoning being being the goal. I fail to see how this necessarily implies "dominance". Rational & perhaps careful use thereof, yes, but dominance?
    5. yes animals do count in this discussion. The point of my argument is not to raise animals to human intellectual level, but to question the use of Objectivism as allowing for or worse advocating trophy killing - see my point 4 above.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was just thinking about this song the other day....pre lion....and how that's always how I've always lived and think life should be. Carpe Vitam!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by woodlema 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ok I will flat out say it. Your a bit wonky here.

    In the 1600's The United States did NOT exist, they were still offshoots of the European Crown and were colonies of the King, and the King dictated the church and also caved to the will of the Church.

    The United as founded in the late 1700's, and the United States did not become a country until then.

    You seem to like to combine and modify history to suit your weird ideas. The Constitution which was the founding and primary contract for the United States when they CEASED being colonies under the rules of the King, CEASED control of Religion and morality. Please refer to the 1st Amendment AND the specific 10 Government enumerated powers. NONE of which has anything to do with morality.

    Next please refer tot he letter Jefferson sent to the Church of Danbury. WAKE up and stop trying to obfuscate and combine topics in a poor attempt to confuse.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    again with the insults. TROLL!!!!!!!!!!

    If you can't post without insulting people DON"T POST

    PS. Divine is spelled with two Is,
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -4
    Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Can you provide a single example in human history where a society flourished with freedom, liberty, and property rights based on your parameters: absent a moral compass, based solely on the good will and reason of its citizens... agsin with no moral compass.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -3
    Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Can you provide a single example in human history where a society flourished with freedom, liberty, and property rights based on your parameters: absent a moral compass, based solely on the good will and reason of its citizens... again with no moral compass.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -3
    Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Again, your lack of knowledge about the link between morality and freedom/liberty/property rights is the problem.

    Not believing a=a doesn't change reality.

    The Devine irony is that those with your perspective chastise the very fundamentals that provide the freedom that we all cherish. As long as there are more that think as I do (which there are), those that think like you can continue to be wrong without consequences. The reverse is not true, though. Like Jews/Muslims laying down arms... one equals peace and one equals extermination.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -4
    Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do I need to prove to you why 2+2 is NOT 5, or is it enough to say 2+2=4.
    It's an undeniable fact that America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. At the founding, more than half of the colonies had state funded churches. You might as well be challenging an essertion that there were 13 colonies or that Washington was the first president.

    Your lack of knowledge on the subject is not for me to remedy.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo