

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Contact the Pacific Legal Foundation for advice. PLF is a "public interest law" organization that specializes in defending private property rights in the courts and setting precedents.
It was in Jefferson Canyon, tho, on that eventful day on July 4th, 1994 that he impressed me the most in a small but key way. The big events of the day ( a huge story in itself, that I address in the book) were over. It was hot. A lot of people were sitting in the shade of the now "evil" Pinyon-Juniper Forest trees just gabbing away. I heard Cliven nearby telling another rancher that he would like to buy a copy of his VHS footage of the days events. My immediate thought was: He did not just say "Can I get a copy?". He said "Can I buy a copy?" He knows the value of trade and of giving value for value. That has stuck with me all these years.
I have all of my own footage of the events of that day on VHS. I must get them into digital.
When I was a young and new Objectivist, religion was my hot button in a big way. And I was good at activating religious people's hot buttons too...the highlight was when someone set a paper on my door on fire (in the dorm). I've since learned to project myself differently...anyway, I know your challenge! Thanks again for sharing it. If you are willing to continue discussing what you've tried and how it's worked (or not), that would be great and appreciated. Probably a good standalone question or topic however.
I hope you find many people here in the online Gulch who are positive and also "grounded" with a strong net. Hopefully I'll be one of them...and if you want to find more people local to you I hope you find them through this community too. (That isn't me currently, I see from your profile.)
I don't have 'producer' access on this site, so it won't let me message you. I don't have Twitter either, but would be happy to create an account, or if there are any admins or Producer-level folks here, I could pass my email address on to them to forward to you.
Good post. +1
Owing ;a bit is better than receiving a refund as it is up to sixteen or so months - no less than four of devalued money.that you are paying. As a refund it's devalued money they are refunding without benefit of interest.A mere pinpric but $100 times the amount of tax returns let's assume 200,000,000 is $200,000,000,000.00. two hundred billion in devalued buying power dollars. Where as you had the use of the money at a higher buying power rate .Small amount but significant.
In essence under the system they are giving your their money then demanding it back. Why not make maximum use of it and deny them masimum use of the amount.
Look for similar loopholes and please! Feel fre to stick it to them - legally. It's their rules not ours.
See what I mean? Everything we touch is tainted. I've minimized it in my own life, but I can't eradicate it. Short of cutting off all contact with the outside world and living as a self-supporting hermit, I am subject to the undeserved costs and unearned benefits of living under a socialist government.
I have resolved to never take any money directly from a government, and to always take the private option over the public option if that is available. So, no subsidized Obamacare, no government loans, etc.
As long as a trade with someone doesn't involve putting up more in the trade than we are receiving, for instance giving up a really important value more important than what we are receiving, the trade is rational. Or to put it another way, if the trade doesn't involve actual sacrifice of a greater value for a lesser one or a non-value then to trade is rational.
I have people in my life that are pro-freedom and are productive and highly moral people but they are in my eyes operating totally without a net. And some of them have huge gaps where they assume some ideas or people are alright to bring into their life where I see glaring contradictions and dangers from doing so.
It is a challenge to find even objectivist friends who are not so busy looking for an excuse to cast judgment that they seemingly can't have an honest and far reaching philosophical discussion.
Where I struggle is in the formulation of entrepreneurial ideas and plans for bringing these into fruition. Too many years of working as a wage slave, and surrounded by too many non-businesspeople.
Load more comments...