Karl Rove: Only Way To Stop The Violence Is To Repeal Second Amendment
No, Mr. Rove, you don't understand. Areas in the US that have restrictions on the second amendment right to keep and bear arms are typically HIGHER in crime and violence than those that do not.
Disarming the population has historically resulted in very bad things...
Disarming the population has historically resulted in very bad things...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
These kinds of headlines are geared to generate emotion, and in some cases to further split the people in order to conquer. The president right now is again trying to insure there will remain a split between white and black, Christians and Jews, cops and the public, and any category where he can then tell them he is on their side. This will insure they vote as he tells them so he can continue to falsely support them in trying to overcome the dissention he has actually helped create. They will of course then vote for the big "D", it's the patriotic thing to do and he's on “our side”, we gotta vote for him.
It's like PC, it's what could destroy the American way of life if the people don't see through the trash talk. None of its even related to the issues of what we need for a leader to insure that we progress and make this country free again. It's just another gross distraction. What really happened in Benghazi? Did Hillary not defend our people, did she order the stand down, or was she totally oblivions (incompetent) as to what was going on until it was too late? Why did she push the offensive movie theory? Why did she continue to push the movie story even after the facts had some out? Is she just another politician, or was she an effective Secretary of State? What else did she “accomplish” as Secretary of State? Personally I think she had the title but was actually campaigning instead of tending to duty. She’s the kind of employee that has to be directed and watched all the time.
I also believe we all need to concentrate on educating our friends that are on the fence, our ignorant friends, those that we really like but that don’t have a political factual brain cell in their head. I know I’ve awakened a few, and I’ve totally lost a few (one in particular for life), but it will be more effective than just us relating the facts between ourselves. If everyone one of us can educate just one person, we’ll actually double our base. And then we’ve got to get all our political friends to do the same. We’ve only got a little over a year my friends. Get it on.
Lets outlaw politicians.
Yes, Rove makes me rove.
That's because Romney lost the presidential election. Up until then, almost night after night on Fox News, a smiling Rove was holding up his scrawled poll tabulations all indicating Obama would lose his reelection.
After Obama won, you'd think Rove would have lost all credibility. But no-o!
Rove's smiling face was back on Fox News in a heartbeat. Once I even saw him lift up one of his scrawled poll tabulations as I was reaching for my remote.
What are you gonna do, Klueless Karl when someone in a Leatherface mask unlocks your door with a chainsaw? Stay on the phone with 911?
Tabulate this, Talking Head Brainiac: You only have seconds when it takes the cops minutes.
The kid looks like a pussy though, if one of them had been armed (I'm not advocating we strap-up for church every day), but if one had a side arm, he would have definitely left the building without doing anything. He looks like the type that will only prey on the helpless.
IMHO the answer if not enough guns. More folks armed, the more likely a criminal on a rampage gets stopped sooner. I love the yard sign "My Neighbor believes in gun control...We don't"
That being said: we all remember what Benjamin Franklin said about selling essential liberty to buy a little temporary safety. Let's also remember the context of that remark. Franklin faced frontier settlers who wanted British troops to guard their settlement against the N.A. raiders. Franklin advised them instead to arm themselves and defend themselves by themselves. Any government powerful enough to defend, can also tyrannize.
Government doesn't have the power to grant anything. Only citizens can do that.
What I've seen is the high crime areas are typically in locations where voters have granted that right to the State or local governments.
Ninth has to come first. Tenth next, All protected by the Second.
Cherry picking will get you every time or the devils in the details.
DC vs Halller very carefully skirted the need to address the Rights Not Granted issue and with equal care put most of the ball back in the State and local governments court. they really don't want to be forced into addressing the issue head on. I wouldn't doubt the court would refuse a case if they thought that would happen.
Rove though is dead wrong. repealing the Second removes it's protection of the 9th and 10th. Just as stupid an idea as turning Senators into Representatives at large. Bye Bye checks and balances.
Yeah, that's gonna work out.