“Hate On”
This phrase, “hate on”, is becoming quite popular and I am convinced it is some sort ploy like the phrase “give back.” Hate is an emotional reaction, so you can hate something but it is meaningless to say you hate on something. I think it is an attempt to divorce the emotion from the person. K thinks is an attempt to turn into some sort force, which automatically creates victims. I think it is a way of pushing moral relativism. The idea is that hating is bad no matter what the object of that hate. What do you think?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
hate crimes? -- j
I'll stop hating when there stop being people who want to rob me of my liberty.
Jan, taking your youth on faith
I actually use the word hate less than I used to. Objectivism has given me a better respect for definitions. Old habits can still be hard to break, though. And I'm still in denial about my age. :)
A long article paralleling my talk this year can be found at https://hankrangar.wordpress.com/2015/04...
I have wondered if anyone else has noticed this tendency in people as they age.
I think that if you use the word "hate" for more than a couple of classes of actions, you are probably overusing it.
Jan
...ladies and gentleman, that hate, for lack of a better word, is good. Hate is right, hate works. Hate clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Deserved hate, in all of its forms; hate for death, hate for poverty and lack, for sickness, for evil and evil doers, for government and especially corrupt government, for ignorance and incompetence and irrationality, in fact, hate for all things, concepts, and people deserving of hate, is good.
Load more comments...