We WILL find out how it works

Posted by Boborobdos 11 years, 5 months ago to Government
555 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Vermont decided to take it a step further by setting up their very own single payer system.

The slogan of the program: Everybody in, nobody out.

For details: http://www.occupydemocrats.com/vermont-m...


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 16.
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And increasing health care costs have NOTHING to do with malpractice insurance costs driven up by frivolous lawsuits OR the time and effort required to fill in innumerable government-mandated CYA forms ?

    No, it's NOT as simple a "cause and effect" issue as you'd like to make it.

    And, people "without health care" don't all die. What a crappy "argument."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And the left consistently wants to provide any and all services to everyone, no matter what the cost.

    and believes that "the government will pay for it."

    Lunacy of the highest order.

    On Linked In, one libber, when asked by me if there were ANY limit in her mind to how much teachers should be paid, actually said, and I quote... "NO!"

    NO LIMIT. Ten thousand, I asked? A hundred thousand? A million dollars? Ten million PER TEACHER???? "No, she answered... no limit."

    And she's a lawyer, too. Go figure.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Remember, Rocky, that Boboro seems to have the belief that adding millions of people to government funded health care programs will instantaneously reduce TOTAL health care costs in the country.

    I don't disagree AT ALL that more PREVENTIVE CARE will help lower costs in the long run, but I have serous doubts about what the real savings will look like over the next 1, 2, 5, or 10 years.

    We shall see.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exactly! and that's the part that Boboro and the national media completely fail to point out... the ACA funds for the states are NOT "forever funding" from the Feds (ie, national tax receipts..), they go AWAY after a period of time and AFTER THAT, the states (oops... the state's TAXPAYERS) will be the only source of making up the difference!

    Talk about "bait and switch"?! Let alone "caveat emptor"! Sucker bait!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 11 years, 5 months ago
    From the article: "The program will be fully operational by 2017, and will be funded through Medicare, Medicaid, federal money for the ACA given to Vermont, and a slight increase in taxes."

    The citizens of Vermont will be in for a rude awakening, when the additional federal funds for the Medicaid expansion get turned off. These funds are sunset provisions, and if my memory serves me, will expire after 3 years. This was the main reason that my state refused to take this 'bribe' to set up a state exchange...the Florida taxpayers would be handed the bill, when the federal funds ended.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wait... Wait... You're not really Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid posting under a pseudonym, are you???
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    BTW, you didn't prove your alleged "point" that folks will use more health care if it's available.

    ???????? That's not the point, as Hiraghm points out in his reply... AVAILABILITY of a product or service does not create excessive demand... getting it "free" (ie, not having to pay directly for it or having someone else pay for it instead of you) DOES create excessive demand and market distortions.

    But liberal "true believers" will not or can not understand that.

    http://www.plusaf.com/linkedin/linked-in...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ... reminds me of a two-hour discussion I once had with a devout Mormon.

    At the end of which he agreed that "abortion is NOT a 'black or white' issue"...

    You certainly see things in black and white, even if there might be shades of gray.

    Lucky you.
    Maybe.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by airfredd22 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The U.S. Constitution protects the right of its citizens to practice or not any religion i.e. denonmination without preference. It is a common misunderstanding of the 1st Amendment. It does not prohibit the practice of religion but guarantees the right to do so without interference by the state.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by airfredd22 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    re: Boborobdos

    When Americans speak of religion, despite the propaganda the media and this administration puts out, we are usually speaking of Christianity.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by airfredd22 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In that statement of yours you prove your ignorance of her philosophy. She believed in the free offering of charity, but was against forced so called charity through taxation. Free will is is a part of her philosophy and it is also a Christian principle.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by airfredd22 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Re: Boborobdos
    I would suggest you ask some Cubans who risk their lives getting here in small leaky boats unless you can find a few of the people who actually swam through shark infested waters wearing a life preserver.

    As to Ayn Rand being an Atheist, true, but that only shows that she was mistaken in one of her beliefs. In the recently rediscovered interview, she states that one of her reasons for not believing in a God was that it conflicts with man then believing that they could never achieve being like God. her misunderstanding was that Christian belief is that we should all try to become like God, therefore proving her misunderstanding of Christianity.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rozar 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I do. I think that that in most circumstances the individual should be productive and happy and that society will benefit from that individual.

    But there is a cost to reward ratio. The more pure water is, the more expensive. Most people would love to drink the purest water, because it's better for them, but would refuse to pay for all of the resources it takes to purify water to that level.

    It is the same with health. I think I am healthy enough. But I smoke. And for right now I like to smoke, knowing that I will hate it later. Other people over indulge in food. Others refuse to brush their teeth and others refuse to exercise. They feel like their time will be better spent doing other things. Whether it is or not doesn't matter in this discussion, just the fact that they chose to do other things than maintain their body.

    Even genetic diseases fall under this category. If you cared about your health you would go in for a relatively cheap check up and you would ask your family about any common diseases among them. From that point on you can choose to do something to protect yourself from your genetic disposition, or not.

    Maybe you could give me your thoughts on this, I may have gotten off track from where I wanted to go but If you would like to offer your opinion I would appreciate it. Or you can tell me it isn't worth talking about and I could try again lol.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do your own research.

    You just revealed just how little you know about what you are promoting.

    You are about to get exactly what you deserve...but, sadly, you are taking so many of us down with you.

    On second thought, I don't trust you to get the facts, so here is what you didn't know:
    "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Section 1302, “Essential Health Benefits Requirements,” page 45, signed into law on Mar. 23, 2010, available at www.thomas.gov, states:

    "(b) ESSENTIAL HEALTH BENEFITS.—

    (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary shall define the essential health benefits, except that such benefits shall include at least the following general categories and the items and services covered within the categories:

    (A) Ambulatory patient services.

    (B) Emergency services.

    (C) Hospitalization.

    (D) Maternity and newborn care.

    (E) Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment.

    (F) Prescription drugs.

    (G) Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices.

    (H) Laboratory services.

    (I) Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management.

    (J) Pediatric services, including oral and vision care."

    http://healthcarereform.procon.org/view....

    Read it, and weep....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ROFL... The Shriners' doctors are among the best of the best when it comes to orthopedic and burn treatment. Are you wrong because supreme ignorance, or are you deliberately wrong?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    it doesn't *say* that. It said the raising and supplying of *an army*. Words meant things back then.

    No, it doesn't mean that today we'd have to implement a draft.
    You chose to entirely overlook the marines part of my comment. And the fact that the States are expected to train the militia, meaning we'd already have trained troops, just not the hated "regulars".

    Whether we need a standing army or not has nothing to do with its Constitutionality.

    And generals and Admirals have such a great track record of picking weapons, such as the cavalry officers who opposed implementation of the tank and airplane, the naval opposition to aircraft carriers (the potential of which nobody but Billy Mitchell saw before Pearl Harbor. Sad that only the Japanese listened to him).
    It wasn't politicians who held up the adoption of the M16 rifle.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I did NOT say they weren't "as good as any others". I said I'd bet they weren't the best.
    And I'd bet the doctors at the Shriner's Hospital aren't among the best in the world, except in the sense that doctors practicing in America are among the best in the world.

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    so, it is YOUR judgment.

    Fortunately this is America and we don't have to put up with that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The whole Tripoli affair is a stain on the history of the United States and a stench in the aroma of Jefferson's legacy. We sold out an ally for the sake of that vile treaty, it surprises me not a bit that the treaty turned out to be nothing but Moslem-pandering. I find it ironic, as no "harmony" existed between the United States and Libya at the time.

    "I find that I agree fully with my good friend Patrick Henry when he said it cannot be emphasized too strongly or to often that this great nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians, not on religions, but on The Gosple of Jesus Christ." - Edward Rutledge

    "Amongst other strange things said of me, I hear it is said by the deists that I am one of the number; and indeed, that some good people think I am no Christian. This thought gives me much more pain than the appellation of Tory; because I think religion of infinitely higher importance than politics; and I find much cause to reproach myself that I have lived so long, and have given no decided and public proofs of my being a Christian. But, indeed, my dear child, this is a character which I prize far above all this world has, or can boast." - Patrick Henry

    "While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian."
    -- John Adams

    "The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever."
    --Adams wrote this in a letter to his wife, Abigail, on July 3, 1776.

    "I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ."
    --The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, p. 385.

    The "wall of separation" is between *church* and state, not between *religion* and state, which gets back to the "establishment" issue.
    Just as the 1st never protects you from *exposure* to speech, it never protects you from *exposure* to religion, even speech and religion expressed by those in high office.

    Please list all the Moslems who signed the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution.
    After, please list all the scientologists, Buddhists, Taoists, Wiccans, atheists (*not* "deists"!), and Hindus.
    I think you will find that, particularly culturally, those who formed the government were primarily oriented toward Christianity.
    Thank God.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo