We WILL find out how it works
Posted by Boborobdos 11 years, 5 months ago to Government
Vermont decided to take it a step further by setting up their very own single payer system.
The slogan of the program: Everybody in, nobody out.
For details: http://www.occupydemocrats.com/vermont-m...
The slogan of the program: Everybody in, nobody out.
For details: http://www.occupydemocrats.com/vermont-m...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
I think we also agreed that rebuilding in hurricane and flood zones was crazy when structures are wiped out again and again.
Rather than a bridge might a ferry where those who are traveling down there can pay as individuals? Or, is the volume too high? A toll road perhaps? After all, it is they who choose to be out on the islands.
So, you can see that I'm not for supporting pet pork barrel projects just to suck up tax $$$.
How are those without insurance supposed to pay for the operation?
I think the problem in the way you phrase your second paragraph is that it's impossible to quantify how much "support" "society" needs or wants.
It's the proverbial, robbing Peter to pay Paul always gets the support of Paul.
And as my lawyer-adversary Claire on Linked In's White House Group puts it, there is NO LIMIT in her mind to how much teachers should be paid. Yeah, they're very important, but NO LIMIT?! Hundreds of k per year? Millions?
I really think that individuals and a "free market" can set the "going price" of just about everything much better than any "good for society" claim.
Here in NC, there's a current battle going on between eco-forces and government agencies about repairing or replacing a bridge to the Outer Banks. One eco-group actually proposes building something like the second-longest bridge in the world to solve "access" problems for the local residents, while the government tries to point out that their solution fails to meet existing EPA regs!
Go figure. Why does my home insurance rate include subsidies for folks who own a home on the coast? Good of Society so people can go there to fish, sun-bathe and vacation.
I'd much rather pay the going rate for a sensible bridge and local dining and lodging costs based on real costs than some nebulous "good of society" impossible estimate.
"Posted by Boborobdos 1 day, 5 hours ago
Really? And what do you expect the outcome of diabetes to be when untreated? "
Yes, diabetes, untreated, will likely kill you, but one of my local friends decided that he didn't want to be treated for his diabetes, so he went on a very strict and healthy diet, lost weight and lost his diabetes. I just had bariatric surgery last week. I was on the road to diabetes. Most people who have the surgery and had diabetes go completely off insulin or other treatment in days, weeks or months.
Stop throwing red herrings and black/white "what-if's" into the mix, ok?
Thanks.
EXACTLY! That's how many many people feel about over enthusiastic Christians out to get their ticket to that their heaven with that their bullying brutal god.
BTW, at least militant gays haven't shot any doctors in the name of their god.
Good luck and Merry Christmas.
Fred
Sad that you consider laws and social contracts to be "force." My guess is you just don't understand the benefits of and living in a society.
The trucks who are using the roads pay to use the roads. Those costs are figured in to what the company charges for the product.
Now, I could pay less for the product if the federal government didn't charge the truckers so much, because most of what I get here in OKC comes from Paul's Valley... which is local.
You really don't get it, do you? We are in a society. If you don't like it go make your own gulch.
I should pay my share of what I don't use?
If the truck driver isn't paid, the food won't arrive.
If the trucking company isn't paid, the food won't arrive.
When I pay for the food, I pay Walmart. They pay Tyson. Tyson pays the driver. I get the food.
Perfect. Natural. Trading value for value... everybody wins... until something we can't control poisons that balance...
I can honestly say that I have never attempted to convince or convert any non-believer in God. I will always wish them good fortune and only ask of them that they do the same. No Atheist has ever been able to honestly show any harm to them by any Christian. That's not to say that there aren't people who call themselves Christians who sadly aren't really clear on the concept. I wish you good fortune as I wish for any decent human being who respects others as they would like to be respected.
Fred
I should not impose anything on him/her, or vice versa. The Atheist belief that Christians want to impose anything on atheist or other religions for that matter is based on false representations by those that are always attacking Christianity. That's not to say that there aren't some misguided Christians who can get a little pushy at times. The same is true for the other side of course. When was the last time a Christian filed a lawsuit to prohibit an Atheist from doing what he wants to do other than constantly sue Christians?
The bottom line is that for me as a Christian there is ample evidence of my faith everywhere around me, from natures bounty to mathematics. Are mathematics so precise by chance? I don't believe so. I believe therefor it is so.
Funny thing is that Ayn Rand actually believed in the same thing, she just chose it to be created by chance. Our core beliefs are the same.
Fred
Load more comments...