We WILL find out how it works
Posted by Boborobdos 11 years, 5 months ago to Government
Vermont decided to take it a step further by setting up their very own single payer system.
The slogan of the program: Everybody in, nobody out.
For details: http://www.occupydemocrats.com/vermont-m...
The slogan of the program: Everybody in, nobody out.
For details: http://www.occupydemocrats.com/vermont-m...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 12.
I "believe" it when I see it. Show me your god, not a big foot foot print in the woods.
You are saying that words mean anything you want them to mean. Which yeah sure, that's true. But no one is going to understand what you are saying. That's exactly what you are doing in your previous argument. redefining words to whatever makes your point valid.
Fred
I believe the WHO has been politicized and their findings suspect. Their studies are lacking some metrics and even if they weren't I wouldn't really care. Freedom comes with risk and a price. I will take my own risks and freedom. I don’t really care what other nations are doing. I would rather live free for a shorter period than to live under the collective thumb agenda for longer.
However, there is reason the right is skeptical. These may be somewhat dated, but I have no reason to believe things are any different.
http://www.cato.org/publications/briefin...
http://www.yalemedlaw.com/2011/04/method...
http://healthcare-economist.com/2010/04/...
http://wichitaliberty.org/health-care/wo...
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB12...
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports...
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports...
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports...
red has an objective definition. the label "red" is arbitrary, but we do have to agree on the label. THat's language. but just because someone is color blind, does not mean "red" does not exist. As we gain more knowledge, we can more exactly define what red means. ie. it's wave length, heat temp related to a black body...but all of this is based on an objective reality. verifiable. not subjective beliefs. I want to point out that in common language the word "faith" can be confused with "confidence." This is not what Rand meant when discussing "Faith."
Believing is when you know something but can't prove it, and knowledge comes from believing what you believe to be true.
Just Wow, but what the hey, so many agree with you, and consensus = truth, right?
LOL
Fred
What an interesting confluence of concepts.
May I remind you of that girl Mary who got knocked up by a much older guy? If Joe hadn't been such a good guy what might have happened?
Great points, there's only one problem with your points. I defy you to find one statement I made insisting that i as a Christian am right and you as an atheist are wrong. Nor have made any attempt to "convert" you to anything and in my opinion to each his own. If a person wants to hear about Christianity or any other religion, I'm always willing to discuss the matter as I have with you. This conversation started not because I insisted on the validity of Christianity or any other religion, It was your insistence on the lack of existence of a God that started the conversation. My best wishes to you in your persuits.
Fred
ROFL... Simple though. You don't get to define me.
BTW, isn't that a doctor's union?
That's from: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2013102...
Let's go for something TODAY...: "
December 6, 2013 by J-Wire Staff
Read on for article
The development of ground breaking communications systems for the next generation of computers is the goal of research collaboration between the University of Sydney and Technion – Israel Institute of Technology…with financial backing from the NSW Government.
The project was launched yesterday by the NSW Minister for Health and Medical Research, Jillian Skinner MP, and the Technion’s Chairman of the Board of Governors, Lawrence Jackier at an official event at the University of Sydney."
http://www.jwire.com.au/news/technion-an...
Stem Cell research in the Philippines.
Research on pot in Israel.
Holey crap Bat Man, some of the most advanced research in the world has been illegal in America for political and religious reasons.
Do you really want to claim that America is the most advanced in the world? All because people make money at it?
In fact patent pharmaceuticals in America have kicked prescription prices to among the highest in the world. Others around the world can more easily get them because they are government subsidized, so even when we are best in developing something many Americans just won't be participating because of the right wing politics.
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/does-the...
There, have I made a point?
I believe we will have to agree to disagree.
Like your heading... We will see.
I think we are done now.
Thank you.
As it usually is with those who don't really have a point.
Show us another specific standard than WHO uses and why that should be adopted instead. Meanwhile universal health care sure looks like it's working in lots of places and it's much less expensive.
Claim: "They include factors that are arguably unrelated to actual health performance, some of which could even improve in response to worse health performance."
But it's an empty claim. Nothing to back it up. Just political screeching.
I looked at a couple of others and they appear to be little but political diatribes trying to discredit WHO with vague claims rather than offering any real evidence.
Load more comments...