Health Insurance Sometimes Borders on a Racket

Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago to Economics
207 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

We took our kid to a doctor for a minor but persistent respiratory problems. The doc suggested two possible diagnostic tests. We asked some questions about whether the results would affect which interventions we used. I thought the results may or may not be of some use, so I asked what it would cost. He said something like, “Oh no, do you have to pay for medicine [outside of health plan premiums]?” We told him yes, but the cost would not be a burden for us at all. We talked through it and we all decided the tests wouldn't affect the treatment and would only be worthwhile if someone else were paying for it.

This is the THIRD TIME in the past four years a doctor has suggested something that costs several thousand dollars and withdrew the suggestion after we took a moment to work through a quick-and-dirty cost/benefit analysis.

There was an opposite example with my wife's pregnancy. The doc started to say we could have so many ultrasound tests and then said, “oh wait, you're private pay. Nevermind. You can have them every day if you want. They're $183 each.”

These insurance plans that insure against every little trifling expenditure are a gravy train for providers. They start with people wanting to turn over responsibility for managing expenses to a company or gov't.

People should be free to make stupid health decisions, like my decision to indulge in Taco Bell and other unhealthful habits.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Posted by Mamaemma 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rocky Road, is this a place to have lively discussions among people of differing belief systems, or is this the Gulch?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This used to be a place that wasn't just an O echo chamber. It is rapidly turning into same.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Like tobacco used to be?
    Or is he so corny, that he might be part of an ethanol subsidy....

    Leave him alone, guys!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why would you say such a thing, when it's certainly not true?

    I have no interest in Objectivism as it's fundamental premise is false and I have no reason to study something that is fundamentally wrong.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Come to think of it, I recently read somewhere that it is easier to cure an alcoholic than a liberal. Case in point, my father became an ex-alcoholic 30 years ago, which is quite an admirable feat, but he is still a die-hard liberal hippie.. go figure.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why am I getting Robbie and cg confused? Sorry? But no I don't think jg would invite believers either, but you need to read more rand with an open, logical mind that deals with facts, not faith, to understand that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry, not Ron Paul, but Ross Perot. Paul, though fiscally reasonable, didn't have a chance in hell of getting the enough votes to win.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's the 6 million dollar, two year long, question we've been asking here. Perhaps he's a federally funded plant.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo