Health Insurance Sometimes Borders on a Racket
Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago to Economics
We took our kid to a doctor for a minor but persistent respiratory problems. The doc suggested two possible diagnostic tests. We asked some questions about whether the results would affect which interventions we used. I thought the results may or may not be of some use, so I asked what it would cost. He said something like, “Oh no, do you have to pay for medicine [outside of health plan premiums]?” We told him yes, but the cost would not be a burden for us at all. We talked through it and we all decided the tests wouldn't affect the treatment and would only be worthwhile if someone else were paying for it.
This is the THIRD TIME in the past four years a doctor has suggested something that costs several thousand dollars and withdrew the suggestion after we took a moment to work through a quick-and-dirty cost/benefit analysis.
There was an opposite example with my wife's pregnancy. The doc started to say we could have so many ultrasound tests and then said, “oh wait, you're private pay. Nevermind. You can have them every day if you want. They're $183 each.”
These insurance plans that insure against every little trifling expenditure are a gravy train for providers. They start with people wanting to turn over responsibility for managing expenses to a company or gov't.
People should be free to make stupid health decisions, like my decision to indulge in Taco Bell and other unhealthful habits.
This is the THIRD TIME in the past four years a doctor has suggested something that costs several thousand dollars and withdrew the suggestion after we took a moment to work through a quick-and-dirty cost/benefit analysis.
There was an opposite example with my wife's pregnancy. The doc started to say we could have so many ultrasound tests and then said, “oh wait, you're private pay. Nevermind. You can have them every day if you want. They're $183 each.”
These insurance plans that insure against every little trifling expenditure are a gravy train for providers. They start with people wanting to turn over responsibility for managing expenses to a company or gov't.
People should be free to make stupid health decisions, like my decision to indulge in Taco Bell and other unhealthful habits.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Not sure that all here who are "likable" will meet the threshold of the majority.
That is a two sided sword: if you force upon me to endure Progressive leadership, because you refuse to vote against it...then "you're the murderer, not me.
Dealing with ailing parents, as khalling and many others can tell you, is no fun. One area that I struggle with AR's ideals is with familial relationships. I love my parents, wife, and kids. John Galt would say that I am not sacrificing for them; rather I am exchanging values, albeit perhaps belatedly with my parents or in anticipation of a future relationship with my kids. However, I am quite sure that my parents would tell me that they sacrificed a lot for me. I am repaying that in part now, but I'm not sure it is even possible to exchange equal value to what your parents gave to you. Pardon me for being a little mushy here, but for me, this is a sticking point between where I am and being a strict Objectivist.
You thought I didn't have a 'g'? what? OH..never mind...I don't...IT'S.AN.EXPRESSION. Christ Almighty!
DING DING DING DING DING DING!
(Buzzer goes off)
'Oh...sorry, wrong answer!"
Remember Joe the Plumber? Obama made national news telling him that "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
The only real difference is around the edges on where they want to spend non-entitlement monies.
I personally always prefer PPOs, but that has become a rare option in my part of the country.
There are so many levels to answer it on.
- I imagine some people here have traits of characters in Fountainhead or AS, people who refuse to be denied making stuff happen, and people not making stuff happen b/c it's their life and they don't have to.
- I have a strong fantasy of people forming a Gulch, going off to live deliberately and be left alone. It would be kind of like how the US was formed, based partly on ideas that were mostly a philosophical fantasy, but they became real and became the model of gov't around the world. I imagine Gulches forming an leading a post-state world based on ideas that seem impossible now.
- The website is a nice place to take break and talk about something unrelated to work.
- Every once in a while I see some new idea to think about.
Hint, hint.
It is time to start working on that Gulch of mine.
Load more comments...