Health Insurance Sometimes Borders on a Racket
Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago to Economics
We took our kid to a doctor for a minor but persistent respiratory problems. The doc suggested two possible diagnostic tests. We asked some questions about whether the results would affect which interventions we used. I thought the results may or may not be of some use, so I asked what it would cost. He said something like, “Oh no, do you have to pay for medicine [outside of health plan premiums]?” We told him yes, but the cost would not be a burden for us at all. We talked through it and we all decided the tests wouldn't affect the treatment and would only be worthwhile if someone else were paying for it.
This is the THIRD TIME in the past four years a doctor has suggested something that costs several thousand dollars and withdrew the suggestion after we took a moment to work through a quick-and-dirty cost/benefit analysis.
There was an opposite example with my wife's pregnancy. The doc started to say we could have so many ultrasound tests and then said, “oh wait, you're private pay. Nevermind. You can have them every day if you want. They're $183 each.”
These insurance plans that insure against every little trifling expenditure are a gravy train for providers. They start with people wanting to turn over responsibility for managing expenses to a company or gov't.
People should be free to make stupid health decisions, like my decision to indulge in Taco Bell and other unhealthful habits.
This is the THIRD TIME in the past four years a doctor has suggested something that costs several thousand dollars and withdrew the suggestion after we took a moment to work through a quick-and-dirty cost/benefit analysis.
There was an opposite example with my wife's pregnancy. The doc started to say we could have so many ultrasound tests and then said, “oh wait, you're private pay. Nevermind. You can have them every day if you want. They're $183 each.”
These insurance plans that insure against every little trifling expenditure are a gravy train for providers. They start with people wanting to turn over responsibility for managing expenses to a company or gov't.
People should be free to make stupid health decisions, like my decision to indulge in Taco Bell and other unhealthful habits.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
What is the difference? It's inside your head.
I want to be able to look that person in the mirror in the eyes every morning and not be ashamed.
did I say YES!!!!!?
"I will not help you to pretend that I have a chance. I will not help you to preserve an appearance of righteousness where rights are not recognised. I will not help you to preserve an appearance of rationality by entering a debate in which a gun is the final argument. I will not help you to pretend that you are administering justice."
"But the law compels you to volunteer a defence!"
There was laughter at the back of the courtroom.
"That is the flaw in your theory, gentlemen," said Rearden gravely, "and I will not help you out of it. If you choose to deal with men by means of compulsion, do so. But you will discover that you need the voluntary co-operation of your victims, in many more ways than you can see at present. And your victims should discover that it is their own volition - which you cannot force - that makes you possible. I choose to be consistent and I will obey you in the manner you demand. Whatever you wish me to do, I will do it at the point of a gun. If you sentence me to jail, you will have to send armed men to carry me there - I will not volunteer to move. If you fine me, you will have to seize my property to collect the fine - I will not volunteer to pay it. If you believe that you have the right to force me - use your guns openly. I will not help you to disguise the nature of your action." Hank Rearden
Why would it be a huge argument? "I'm not going. these birthday parties are becoming ridiculous, it's way too expensive and I need some time to myself because I'm a human being and sometimes humans need time alone." Kids NEED to know and appreciate that fact. A loving relationship recognizes that too. Respect. Sometimes..what you want IS what you need. (In the grand scheme of things, we all need some solitude.)
Rocky, that is your error, and that is also my point. The real world is NOT an infinite shade of gray. Everything IS black and white. There is a right and there is a wrong. Half right is still half wrong..it's the wrong that poisons the whole well, even if it might be perceived as being diluted wrong. Wrong is still wrong, big or little. We are where we are today because of that very way of thinking. Oh we'll just compromise on this and that and before you know it we're sitting on the edge of a cliff asking "how'd we get here". Because we let the wrong IN. Every corrupt thing (schools, business, people) if you follow it all backward to where things started to go bad...it's when the compromising with the wrong crept into the equation. And once it's in...it grows and grows and grows... just like the government.
You keep looking for black and white, while the real world is an infinite shade of gray.
What if Scott Walker gets the nod?? Is he a progressive sellout, too??
I try not to do something like this for my kids grudgingly. If I experience vicarious joy from my kids, that's not grudging. I avoid doing it b/c that's what people think good parents do.
It reminds me the bible passage where Jesus says fasting for God isn't really for God if you walk around letting everyone know how pious your fasting is.
I don't believe in religion at all, but some of its ideas are part of my me.
Anyway, I say we're sometimes tempted to grudgingly do something for someone, but this altruism is no benefit to the giver or receiver.
I have kids too. I chose to. I never felt like I was sacrificing anything I willingly gave up to be their parent. It's totally counter productive to being a good parent and example.
Load more comments...