Buck! Buck! Buck!

Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago to Politics
119 comments | Share | Flag

Do we have a Chicken-In-Chief about security do we have a Chicken-In-Chief with a PC horrid angst as being perceived as opposed to an Islamic anything?
I've also noticed that "violence" is even WH PC preferred over that terrible "terrorism" t-word.

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If that was what the "free" world leaders were up to, the WH Marxist-I-Chief definitely should have showed up.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Showing terrorists you are not afraid?
    Diplomacy? Statesmanship?
    Whoa! I have an idea. Show the whole world your middle finger and stop sending them money we do not have.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I've always heard "buck, buck, buck" when someone was being called a chicken.
    Maybe it's a Deep South thing.
    Have to admit "bawk" sounds better than "buck," But then again I have tinnitus.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah, I recall that BS about how some paperwork about the protest did not show up in time on O's desk.
    Now the reason is security.
    You can tell people are lying when the story keeps changing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And the Administration has been more than happy to jump on the Tea Party any time there has been a bombing or shooting suspect, only to find out that these wackos are communists and several of them were supporters of Obama!

    Remember his "clinging to God, guns, and religion" comments? This president is more than happy to castigate his political opponents, but just can't see reality for what it is.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by sumitch 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh but they have named one group of extremists. Recall that veterans were judged and tarred and feathered by this administration.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If that were the reason, then the statist hypocrite in the WH would have been there using the Concorde (he would have hauled its ass out of mothballs just to get him there on time).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They might have gotten away with it, except that someone actually asked the Secret Service if they could have provided security and they answered truthfully that they weren't even asked. Caused some serious backtracking at the WH, where an "un-named lowly staffer" was then thrown under the bus. Make no mistake, this decision came from O hisself. He refuses to allow the US to admit that the Islamic religion has a faction (at least) that believes in and uses terror as a mechanism to "advance" their religious beliefs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think you got it. Thanks for the reference. I hadn't heard that Harf (rhymes with Barf) person before. Where do they grow idiots like that?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ah...that must also be why their new narrative is saying "extremist of any kind" because, according to leftist rhetoric, "there are other dangerous extremists we need to worry about, not just islamic extremist"...of course they didn't name any by name... perhaps whoever they want to call an extremist at any given moment... like....maybe...objectivists, or libertarians, or conservatives...
    http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2015/0...
    And WHAT is up with this Harf hag...omg.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 3 months ago
    I think it's about spreading a wider umbrella in order to rope in more than just Muslim terror.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 3 months ago
    Is you're title supposed to be "BAWK BAWK BAWK!!"?
    I read this trying to figure out who Buck was... at any rate... I believe his imam told him not to go. And this security b.s. was cooked up immediately. Much like the Benghazi/video excuse. Throw people off the scent... Ed Henry did a nice hammering job. Made Earnest dance a bit.... not that it changes anything I guess.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    But you're not the statist hypocrite politician in the White House.
    Perhaps the Marxist's failure not to show up at that huge free speech event made El Presidente less a hypocrite.
    Dang! Having fun with this.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 3 months ago
    I would have refused to attend because I didn't want to associate with all those statist hypocrite politicians.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo