10

Comfyballs underwear 'too vulgar for sale in U.S.', Patent office says | Daily Mail Online

Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 5 months ago to Government
30 comments | Share | Flag

Sometimes all you and do is shake your head and laugh.

All Comments

  • Posted by $ winterwind 10 years, 5 months ago
    What I want to know is if they are comfy enough for Gods' Hairy Balls.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I should no better than to start up with Gulchers. Ask a simple question and you get a multitude of answers, each better than the last.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hmmm. Thanks for my first laugh of the day. It leads me to: Nuthousing, Comfynuts (too close?) Nicenads, Comfycahones.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 5 months ago
    Are you sure this isn't a new SNL joke? Perhaps we can come up with a new name that would satisfy the keepers of our delicate sensibilities.
    How about ComfyCodpiece? TerrificTestes? ComfyGlobes?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 10 years, 5 months ago
    Look on the bright side........

    We finally know what happened to all the unemployed censors from Hollywood

    /rolleyes
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 5 months ago
    Not too vulgar for sale. Too vulgar for trademark.

    Clearly more vulgar than Nicki Minaj's boyfriends "...Anaconda don't..." NOT
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mobilus 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not to mention Victoria's Secret. Let's be honest, Victoria has no secrets left...and this is definitely a double standard. Part of the society's emasculation of today's male.

    They do look comfortable.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo