Fury

Posted by Itheliving 9 years, 6 months ago to Movies
15 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Fury / Rated R for war violence, psychological torture and gore. Not Al.
Fury is a full blown WWII movie. And it is a rare tank crew story. Right up front; except for golf course accidents this is an every kind of violent death movie. If you are squeamish do not see this film. Otherwise this is an entertaining, although a little long, war film. It reminds me of three war movies and two westerns. Saving Pvt. Ryan (1998), set the standard for realistic war violence and Fury follows in its wake. It also owes a lot to Sahara (1943) with Humphrey Bogart and The Sands of Iwo Jima (1949) with John Wayne, for their tough no nonsense characters. The westerns it pays homage to include The Wild Bunch (1969) and any version of The Alamo especially the most recent version (2004).
The storyline follows a single tank crew who, except for one newcomer, have been in the war since its early days. Now they are on the home stretch trying to survive to see the end. The story takes place inside Germany during the last month of WWII in Europe. It states on screen it is April of 1945. Hitler was dead by the end of the month and WWII in Europe was over by May 8th. Unfortunately the fight for the Homeland is the one the Germans waged the hardest. Using kids, girls, old men and anybody else he could enlist, Hitler insisted they fight till the end. Many did.
The tank crew consists of “Top” Sergeant E-6 played by Brad Pitt. Pitt is terrific assuming the leadership role as the “tough as nails” persona he has to become. He is a cross between the above mentioned John Wayne and Humphrey Bogart. He is accompanied by Shia LaBeouf showing he can leave his personality out of the story and be the character he needs to be. Also in the crew are Michael Pena and Jon Bernthal. The addition of a new member, Logan Lerman, makes for lots of high drama. LL plays a 60 WPM clerk typist who has seen no combat and is brought in as a machine gun operator replacement at the last minute.
All crew members are especially good although the BP character dominates. The story follows their procession through a part of Germany as the Allies proceed on their bloody campaign to make it to Berlin and win the war.
Two lines from BP by writer/director David Ayer explain a lot about this movie. In one scene, civilians caught in the middle of the carnage ask BP when the war will end and he replies “when your people quit”. When confronted by the raw and brutal violent acts he commits he makes another simple but true statement, “Ideals are peaceful. History is violent”. These are lessons for anyone who finds themselves in a war. You might want to reread them if you don’t understand their truth.
Although flawed by length this is a terrifically entertaining film as long as you can stand the war violence. That is why I have repeated the warning.
Rated 3.8 out of 4.0 reasons not to read this review if you have seen any of the main four films this movie mimics. The spoiler alert is too late. Too bad. Tough as nails. That’s me.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by NealS 9 years, 6 months ago
    Haven't seen it, but now I'm going to give it a shot. Enjoyed the realism of Saving Private Ryan, and always liked the old relics with Bogart and Wayne. The movies I didn't like were mostly of Vietnam. The majority were more political rants and lies showing what didn't happen just to make some political point. The best of the Vietnam breed was, "We Were Soldiers and We Were Young". "Apocalypse Now" was one real piece of total garbage. I wish I hadn't seen it. I'm still waiting for another truth movie on Vietnam, I'd do a true story myself if I knew how and hadn't lost my on site daily notes (someone had to throw them away over the years, probably one of my ex-wives). Thanks for the review.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 6 months ago
    While Pitt gives one of the best performances of his career, the movie belongs to Logan Lerman. We see through his eyes the nature of war as he goes from a pacifistic typist to a machine gun wielding killer in one day. To appreciate this film fully, you must see it in a theater that has a good stereo sound set-up as the sound effects are startlingly real. When those cannons go off, you can feel them right through to your nervous system. It portrays the claustrophobic world of the tank soldiers as they lumber through to the enemy as killing machines but vulnerable to destruction as well.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
    Due to space restrictions and word counts I had to leave out a couple of facts. The film was shot entirely in England. That happens to be where the only known German Tiger Tank is on display. They put it into working condition. You can see it in action in Fury
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 6 months ago
    Looking forward to Fury as a Netflix rental. When I first saw the TV add, I immediately thought of "Sgt. Fury and His Howling Commandos" toward the end of my teenaged comic book reading days.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXu8IJrwA...

    Warning: Do not think renting the latest "Godzilla" will be any fun. Most of the monster fighting are in night scenes too dark to see. Sat in my Easy Boy feeling both frustrated and very insulted as a viewer yesterday. I became more irate by recalling that I could always see stuff going on during night scenes in the cheap rolling tank toy Japanese monster movies I used to watch way back when I was still reading comics. Will give it one Netflix star for "I hated it."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 6 months ago
    The final battle, the one that all the trailers allude to, is one of the most ridiculous and unrealistic battle scenes ever dreamed up in Hollywood. But other than that the movie is not bad.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by badgerdad 9 years, 6 months ago
      Agreed, But machine guns, tracers and a night battle with copious numbers of stupid SS stormtroopers makes for fun viewing.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 6 months ago
        True. But the real battle would have lasted about 10 minutes. Even assuming they could have pulled off the initial ambush. The Germans would have reacted and taken cover, then one squad with a couple panzerfausts would have flanked the tank and been unseen because the tank is buttoned up. The panzerfausts would have killed everybody in the tank and been followed by a couple grenades (thrown through the hatch without standing gawking over the opening by the way). Then the Germans would have moved on.

        There are a number of other ridiculous moments in the battle (like - we were too busy drinking and reciting Bible verses to actually bring all the ammo inside before the Germans get here??).
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo