Hurricane Odile and Inventions
I have had the fortune or misfortune to be dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Odile http://www.weather.com/news/weather-hurr.... I have a client that has an invention that would have been able to restore power in just two days. His invention is described in patent number 7589640 http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7589640.... It senses the force load on a power pole and if it exceeds a certain level, the invention lowers the cross bars and power lines gently to the ground and turns off the sector switch (power). Once the electrical lines and cross bars are on the ground, the wind loads are almost eliminated, which means the power pole is standing at the end of the storm. Utility workers then remove the debris and use a winch type mechanism to raise the power lines and cross bars.
This invention cannot only save billions of dollars in utility repair damage per year, get power up in a tenth the time of present techniques, eliminate billions in lost business per year, it also reduces the risk of injury to utility workers who are no longer required to climb utility poles and bystanders. But that is not all, the inventor has engineered his poles so that they are less expensive to install originally than present utility poles.
GUESS WHO is opposing the inventor? Unions. Their members make a lot of money working storms and they don’t want any system that allows less skilled workers to setup utility poles. Utility companies are ambivalent, because they are regulated and only allowed a certain return on capital. Thus, all the money they save using the inventor’s system will not improve their bottom line one iota. This is just another example of how a regulation stifles inventions and makes our lives worse, more expensive and less safe.
This invention cannot only save billions of dollars in utility repair damage per year, get power up in a tenth the time of present techniques, eliminate billions in lost business per year, it also reduces the risk of injury to utility workers who are no longer required to climb utility poles and bystanders. But that is not all, the inventor has engineered his poles so that they are less expensive to install originally than present utility poles.
GUESS WHO is opposing the inventor? Unions. Their members make a lot of money working storms and they don’t want any system that allows less skilled workers to setup utility poles. Utility companies are ambivalent, because they are regulated and only allowed a certain return on capital. Thus, all the money they save using the inventor’s system will not improve their bottom line one iota. This is just another example of how a regulation stifles inventions and makes our lives worse, more expensive and less safe.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
"If I build a home from scratch, it will have a large 'channel' on the inner walls..." Yes, I have had the very same idea in mind for years. " do the repairs, standing up, in a temperature controlled environment, with plenty of light and no spiders." No spiders! I loathe spiders even though I know that without them the planet would be 10' deep in insects. In my current home I keep the unfinished-but-otherwise-modern basement free of them with minimal effort, but my previous house was built in 1900 with a fieldstone foundation and dirt floor. I was physically unable to go down there. I broke out in a cold sweat if I even stood in the open doorway for more than 20 seconds. If I blew a fuse I had an understanding neighbor who would replace it for me!
Regarding buried utilities, electric, twisted-pair copper, co-ax cable and fiber optic cable are *usually* accessible without digging up the street. If troubles pop up that proved to be located between the street and a home it usually just requires digging a shallow trench if there's a reason to have to expose the conduit.
When I repave my driveway in a few years I'll have the contractor install the necessary conduit(s) to run my utilities underground from the pole.
capitalistic system **still** outperforms the competition,
hands-down. -- j
Nevertheless, this invention could still be used where appropriate and provide the benefits as described.
While I am on a roll here: It used to be the custom for suburban homes to have septic tanks. Septic tanks are a pain, but at least you are not transporting sewage tens of miles to be processed. My current home has a high-tech sewage treatment system...which the State of CA rates as 'output can go into the Pacific Ocean'. So, the output is essentially 'clean' (though not potable). One could potentially re-use this output for agricultural purposes. Since we have this technology, why do we still build around the concept of sewer lines?
If I build a home from scratch, it will have a large 'channel' on the inner walls, at a convenient height. In this channel will run my electrical, gas, water, and com lines. The channel will be covered with a piece of wood trim that is part of a wainscoting or chair rail. When I need to do a repair, I will just yank off a section of the wainscoting and I will be able to do the repairs. I will be able to do the repairs, standing up, in a temperature controlled environment, with plenty of light and no spiders.
It seems obvious to me that one should not build utilities on any scale such that you have to tear up a street or a concrete pad or a wall in order to repair them (and spend most of your time tearing and rebuilding too).
Jan
Stay safe and I hope you have power again soon.