11

House Passes TikTok Divestment Bill That Gives Any Administration Power to Shut Down Any Website That Opposes the Corrupt Federal Government's Policies. D.C. NIFO

Posted by freedomforall 1 month, 2 weeks ago to Politics
23 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Prior to the vote, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) took to the floor to rail against the bill, saying that "there's some of us who feel that - intentionally, or unintentionally, this legislation to ban TikTok is actually a trojan horse.

"Some of us are concerned that there are First Amendment implications here. Americans have the right to view information, and don't need to be protected by the government from information."
The rushed bill, seemingly out of nowhere - and just weeks after the Biden campaign made a TikTok account (and posted to it) on Super Bowl Sunday, has raised concerns over government overreach.

On Tuesday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) noted on X, "The so-called TikTok ban is a trojan horse" that would give the President the power to "ban WEB SITES," not just apps.

"If you think this isn’t a Trojan horse and will only apply to TikTok and foreign-adversary social media companies, then contemplate why someone thought it was important to get a very specific exclusion for their internet based business written into the bill," he added."
----------------------------------------------------
More Deep State Censorship. This is clearly unconstitutional and tyrannical.
D.C. NIFO
SOURCE URL: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-vote-bill-could-ban-tiktok-it-trojan-horse


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    Agreed.

    Patriot Act Anybody?

    BTW, there was NO POWER included in the patriot act, that the government could not accomplish without it... IF THERE WERE a clear and present danger. NONE.

    The difference... When they are wrong... NOW they have cover. And the ability to disappear people.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JakeOrilley 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    I believe that there are security concerns, but this bill is not the way to address the issue. The issue with the kids and there phones has to be addressed by parents - where is there responsibility to all of this? - and the issue with the security issues is to keep it off of all secure systems. As to a bill that would give the executive this kind of power - that is just too much. IMHO.....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    The fantasy of der leaders has been, for a long time, unlocking this censorship capability on the internet. A wet dream. Look at the new terms in our vocabulary "disinformation" and "misinformation". What the hell is that? Well....just ask Big Brother. He'll tell you.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by svojoe 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    It is not a coincidence that this is rushed thru right before the election. The internet, one of the last venues for free speech must be controlled. It is for your own protection, nothing to see here move along sheeple.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    Screw TikTok! That company is BAD! They are the Chinese government, and are specifically 1) snooping, and 2) trying to disrupt the US = Cyber Warfare. This is for absolute certain.

    HOWEVER, the 16th Amendment and FOAA Surveillance, et al Are PERFECT examples of Congress having good intentions that completely go off the reservation, and support the totalitarianism they were intended to fight.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    tik tok is just an excuse
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ allosaur 1 month, 2 weeks ago
      Why does this Trojan Horse Schiff fail to surprise me?
      Now I have a new reason to deny giving donations to the GOP.
      That I have refused to do ever since me dino was angered by RINO behavior during an Obamanation's first term.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by bobsprinkle 1 month, 2 weeks ago
        I might put $20 cash in a jar. But I aint givin them my credit card/bank card number so that I can be harassed constantly for a "donation".
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ allosaur 1 month, 2 weeks ago
          Never used plastic but checks. Started to ink out my home phone number too late way back when the Obamanation was still in office.
          Telling callers the dino does not donate does not work.
          These days when I don't like what I see on my caller ID, I press the answering button, count to three and press "off."
          Sometimes they get sneaky and use a lady's name and I'll think maybe it is a wrong number. I'll cuss out some guy who starts to talk instead.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    When I saw this, my first reaction was the same as a number of views expressed here. I didn't think "trojan horse", but that's a perfect description of my perspective.

    My second thought the quote from Martin Niemöller:

    "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

    Even though I think Tik Tok is about as insidious as it gets, I absolutely cannot support the outright banning of it. It's a slippery slope; once you cross that line, there is no going back.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Aeronca 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    So much now a bill is introduced with good intentions and buried in it is something evil. Let's use AI to ferret out this crap. Let's have single purpose bills.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov 1 month, 2 weeks ago
    Bytedance will challenge the legislation in court, under the 1st amendment. The claim by the federal government, that user information is being provided to Chinese intelligence services, has not been proven, based primarily on the possibility rather than factual evidence.

    Ironically, no similar move has been taken against Telegram, which is Russian owned and much more likely to capture American user information. The Chinese bargain hunter site, Temu is also not a target, so this move is inconsistent to say the least.

    Trump is now an opponent to the Tik Tok ban, which could gain him new supporters among young voters more likely to be Tik Tok fans.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by nonconformist 1 month, 2 weeks ago
      Telegram is not Russia-owned. As I recall, the core developers were Russian but had to flee Russia (I guess to prevent getting taken over by the Russian statist parasites as was the case with VK). They ended up in Dubai. The company is registered in the British Virgin Islands and in Dubai. I personally suspect that they are probably working with Western statist parasites (British intelligence maybe, etc) but who knows.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo