

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
That's why I asked, which 2 in the bottom row.
Sorry, might the wife iron out the wrinkles in your panties?
Now you got me dino panties all in a wad!
Bottom row, me dino said! Bottom row, ding dong dang dab nab it!
As for Blazing Saddles, I never heard my now deceased dad laugh so hard and it was the last movie I ever attended inside a theater with my father and all my four brothers(one now deceased) when staying overnight at a motel in Tuscaloosa to see an Alabama home football game the next day during the Seventies.
It's obvious why Blazing Saddles cannot--not does not need to be remade. It would be so--wah wah--snowflake offensive even though I saw that Mel Brooks gag fest again on TV last night
Three fairly recent movies that should not have been remade is The Magnificent Seven, True Grit and The Fog. None lived up to the originals. That wow special effects treat King Kong is an exception. I have both DVDs.
As for sequels, IMO, those that followed uproarious Smokey and The Bandit were all stinkers. Glad I've only seen bits and parts of those sequels on TV.
Thanks again, OUC!