The God of the Machine - Tranche 24

Posted by mshupe 1 year, 9 months ago to History
13 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Chapter XI, Excerpt 3 of 3
The Meaning of the Magna Carta

The serfs got next to nothing in the Charter, beyond the reservation of their farming tools from fines. The nobles, the merchants, and the yeomen got their positions on record with the means to make a stand so they could persist in opposition to royal power until they did forge the necessary instrument of the mass-veto. In the course of that long struggle, serfdom was abolished, bought out piece-meal. Money, kinetic energy, washed it away.

The king still had his money revenue to support his private army. The merchants had grown strong enough to fight for themselves, and thus represent the contract society. The kinetic energy first destroyed feudalism, then it turned directly against the church as a landed institution. The effective veto was in the Commons; and the law was above the crown. When Charles I failed to perceive this distinction, it was imparted to him with the edge of an axe.

England’s invisible exports were law and free trade. The greatest misfortune of the productive worker is that when he is dropped by the weakened current, he falls into the same category as the habitually non-productive. While England ruled the seas any man of any nation could go anywhere, taking his goods and money with him. The true cause of Fascism is the structureless state . . . the whole energy of the nation thrown into the repressive mechanism of centralized government, with status law.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 9 months ago
    "In the long struggle, serfdom was abolished." Capitalism did it again in the 19th century with slavery.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree. There have been times in this country where employment was not available as well, like during the depression. And in those cases, the otherwise productive end up in the same boat as the "habitually non-productive", which is very unfortunate indeed.

    In most cases, and in today's economy especially, I think there needs to be a distinction between the two groups.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, absolutely, but that may not have been possible in 15th century feudal England. Productive workers were required to belong to their assigned guild.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The only ones I've read recently are Brad Thompson (America's Revolutionary Mind) and James Valliant (Creating Christ). Several years ago, I read a great book by Jay Vinik (The Great Upheaval), but I don't remember if he referenced that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would not consider him "unemployed", but rather retired, or even "gone Galt".

    Good for him!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There are those who stay 'unemployed' because they are on strike and refuse to support the theft of their production by the state.
    I know such a person who has been 'unemployed' since the 90's and has taken no welfare or unemployment payments.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 9 months ago
    "The greatest misfortune of the productive worker is that when he is dropped by the weakened current, he falls into the same category as the habitually non-productive."

    I would say that in our current conditions, productive workers that find themselves unemployed don't stay that way for long. My daughter lost her job, stopped on the way home and applied for another, had a message on her machine when she got home that she was hired. Not as good a job, and making less money, but she was working, and looking for other opportunities WHILE WORKING.

    Those who stay unemployed for years, are CHOOSING to stay unemployed. Our welfare system encourages it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 9 months ago
    "The serfs got nothing" (from the Democratic party). "The king still had his money revenue (the income tax). "The greatest misfortune of the productive worker is that when he is dropped by the weakened current" (government backed labor unions).
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo