[Ask the Gulch] Does anyone know anything about 'syndicalism'?
Posted by Binkley 9 months, 2 weeks ago to Ask the Gulch
- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Ever hear of "The Black Horror on the Rhine"? This is how British newspapers at the time described Clemenceau's and the French Colonel Mangin's "La Force Noir" comprised of Senegaliese troops that were sent to occupy the Rhineland following the Great War. I believe it was part of Clemenceaus's vindictive need to thoroughly humiliate Germany. Wilson disliked it, and House wanted American interests satisfied (The Baghdad Railroad, etc.) but it was done anyway. One historian has said that France paid a horrible price for that decision.
The House of Hohenzollern seems to be an old title, relegated to the history books. Would it surprise you to learn that the head of this House still have claim to the title, Prince of Orange? They still style themselves as the Prince of Prussia or Prince of Orange, despite suggesting Prussia has been relegated to history. The status of such nobility remains unknown; however, they have not ceased to exist. Meet the current Prince of Prussia.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_F...
Recall that Prussia is an “army without a state”. These Houses have incredible influence in the regions they occupy or influence. In the same vein as Caesar in the Roman Empire, the head of Prussia was known as the Kaiser. Whatever authority these Houses had, we can observe that they were politically, very sensitive. The Kings and Queens of the day where very careful in their connections. Notice the connection below between the House of Hohenzollern and the House of Doorn.
Source: https://www.huisdoorn.nl/en/wilhelm-i...
We can now see that this Prussian Empire is the same “force” that morphed itself into a new invisible army between 1871 and 1917. Essentially, this invisible hand became an elaborate series of corporations that would place the entire world into financial-slavery and control via Treaties/ Charters/ Great Powers, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and global entities such as W.H.O., World Bank, E.U., NATO, Council on Foreign Relations etc.
The Prussian army went global and in doing so, it became invisible. To truly seize control of the earth, Prussian ideology would need to become owned by the people. It would need to be a powerful idea. Here is Bush Snr (#41) on September 11, 1991 talking about this New World Order “big idea” that will “fulfil the promise and vision of the UN’s founders:
Well, I condemn the Jewish Left. I have friends on the Conservative side: Ben Shapiro, Dennis Praguer, the owners of a small cookie factory of which I was the CFO, and a great deal of admiration for Richard Feynman. I want to make that clear.
To call critics "anti-Semitc", reminds me of something Obamma said, to wit: "I can always say that any opposition to my policies is racially motivated." Now I don't know if he was told that by his puppet masters or if he came up with it all by himself. Probably the former, as he really is not all that bright.
He also said "There is always a period of turmoil before Socialism sets in"; and another gem: "The concentration of power is inevitable."
Obamma was a dupe, Dobrien, of the Jewish Left, spearheaded by the Frankfurt School, ensconced at Columbia University in 1934."
Again, if you find something you don't like, why don't you say something, instead of making unwarranted and dangerous assumptions?
(Obamma's actual wordage was: "I can always incite riots to prove any opposition to my policies is racially motivated." I believe that was what he was told by his puppet masters, the Jewish Left, in league with the Global Deep State. He's really not bright enough to come up with something like that by himself.)
I may or may not reply. As I said, I'm not yet done with the Jewish Left.
"My hunger for knowledge and history is predicated on the very necessary fact that unless mankind knows the TRUE AND ACTUAL AND REAL reasons for events, especially conflicts between persons and societies, he WILL repeat the very same events and situations that cause conflicts. And the revisionist historians have been very busy in the last five, six or seven decades in CREATING and manufacturing reasons, so-called, that have no connection to consequences. There is nothing more dangerous to mankind than that atrocious ability to fictionalize history,
The Portuguese soldier-cleric in the 15th century, D'Azurara, when chronicling the actions of Prince Henry (the most underrated man in history), knew that, and even wrote why it was necessary to report the truth. I believe what he actually wrote was "...so we do not repeat the mistakes of our ancestors..."
But the Jewish Left refers to Columbus as a murderer and Anglo-Saxons as genocidal maniacs, among other fictions. Anglo-Saxons, the very tribe of people who saved their sorry souls!!
Ingratitude is a trait I despise. Who will save your souls the next time?"
By the way, give my regards to Debbie. Debbie Wasserman whatever.
You could have read all comments I have written since "landing". But you didn't. You assumed from only a few comments that I am anti-Semitic.
But then, you might feel too "special" to work at acquiring knowledge.
And by the way, I'm not done with the Jewish Left just yet. Stick around. Either on this site, or another.
At any rate, your statement "...AFL/CIO Cope newsletter" has no reference with me, and "...lies written by them about me" also means nothing.
Would you care to elaborate?
At any rate, I have been thinking of some things this morning, having to do with the most valued characteristic of the Germanic peoples---loyalty, and its contrapositive, ingratitude. I may write something later today on the "problem".
An unexpected laugh can undo much of that damage. We are NOT making light of our situation, we are just giving our life, our being a break and some healing so that we can carry one with: The Fight for Conscious Human Life©
You sound like a teenager who is trying to laugh his way through some kind of shameful or embarrassing act.
I have to go now.
Laugh at the trials of life, laugh at ourselves laugh at them and others, it's like a reset or reboot, without the bop upside the head.
Did you ever watch "The Bad Seed"? Very good introduction to the development of psychopathy, and an attempt at solving the nature/nurture controversy.
I have to go now.
It was nice talking to you, though.
A psychopath is usually or in many cases a person of great intellect on one subject so involved that ethical considerations are often ignored. It's there for the consideration and the control can be implemented but the attraction to the work is overwhelming. I think of Fauci in this case although he does resemble a relentless hubris.
One could hope that a psychopaths work interest is nothing that will end up harming humanity or at least monitored by a consciously introspective individual.
Once extreme hubris is present, all bets are off. great intellect on a subject be damned, we are all in danger from that individual.
Perhaps moderation comes from association of others alike and a long term plan . . .the fruits of which we are witness to right now. The great reset, one world government, 2030, you will own nothing and be happy . . .sound familiar?
It was a kindly gesture.
We should give it a rest, I guess.
ah, but a psychopath has a limited consciousness. Not the full monte so to speak. Awareness of your environment and awareness that you are different and need to learn the ways of those you are different from. I forget how Jaynes put it but there is that spot inbetween Bicameral (his usage of the word) and Conscious introspection.
It's kind of like Nimrod and his support staff thinking they are better than those building the tower but knowing that somethings afoot, so you must go down and confound their language lest Nothing be impossible unto them.
That was a statement of "I fear them" lets keep them down or we'll be out in the cold.
Causation/Creator did not make that statement...who the heck is "WE"...it was nimrod and the other rulers . . .dumb as rocks they were. They knew we had something they didn't.
I am not going to type all that again, Darn, I was on a roll too.
Suffice to say, They, are not your betters, there is some kind of blockage there, perhaps a genetic flaw, maybe just a psychopath with extreme hubris, but I don't see any talent there.
Here is what I said in the book: WE ARE THE ELITE ON THE STREET and they, are the GREAT UNWASHED.
The paradigm is upside down, perhaps back to the fall of Babylon or before.
You can observe their level of Conscience. That level should be the same for all consciously introspective humans.
The only difference is in the application and usage.
Now, go for a laugh at TGIFfunnies 1st and 2nd editions.
Load more comments...