Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 year ago
    In FRONT isn't that the side of the sign facing the direction you are heading...meaning the back of the sign is facing you.

    Not to mention most stop signs are not positioned where you can see both left and right, after you stop for a second you end up having to poke your nose out to see if anyone is coming.

    Question: was she smokin dope?...asking for a friend.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ pixelate 1 year ago
    Little Heifer.... that is spot on.
    I was at the airport, pre-plandemic, awaiting my flight.
    A little heifer in a blue uniform with a badge comes up to me and wants to go through my bag... "random security check."
    So I move at the speed of a particle in a Bose-Einstein Condensate in terms of standing up, and providing my bag for inspection...
    As the painfully-unaccomplished pudgy momma's boy looks through my bag, I silently stare into the face of the lout.
    The majority of these petty little bureaucrats are of a particular species -- absent their government post, they would be unemployed.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 1 year ago
      Uh, isn't that what those security checkpoints are for? I would be questioning the legality of ANOTHER check by these idiots.

      I still maintain that if the US were really interested in security, they would A) turn security over to the individual airlines to handle and B) take copious notes from the Israelis. you'd get a way better product all around...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ pixelate 1 year ago
        Indeed... I had gone through the whole TSA cattle line... Then, while just sitting there, in the boarding area, minding my own libertarian business with my eyes closed, this soft jellied lad in the blue outfit wanted to exercise his authority.

        I agree with your advice on turning control of security over to the airline that has engaged in a contract for carriage... with implementation notes from Israelis. Of course the true purpose of the TSA is to ensure compliance among the cattle -- and to create a jobs program for soft jellied lads that would otherwise be out of work.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ blarman 1 year ago
          If the TSA was truly more than just a hindrance to passengers they'd have a claim to make, but when >90% of contraband put through by spot-checkers actually gets through...

          And don't get me started on those millimeter-wave scanning machines and their naked images. Or taking off one's shoes, etc.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ pixelate 1 year ago
            Yup -- 12 years ago, I sent a backpack through the scanner ... when I got to the other side, I noticed that there were two full quarts of water in my camel-back (inside the pack)... didn't show up on the scanner or it simply was not on 'The List" of prohibited items. So much for 3 oz fluid limitations. Since then, I have made attempts to send sundry contraband through, mostly with success. The measures are all completely arbitrary -- similar to the Social Distancing / Social Engineering.

            As for the shoes -- every second Thursday of the month, no need to take off your shoes -- or similar nonsense... all completely arbitrary and to engender a sense of compliance among the cattle.

            And if you want to see pure evil -- watch the glint in the eye of the TSA officer as they casually close down a passenger processing line... so they can take their union break. Reminds me of the behavior if Ivy Starnes, Twentieth-Century Motor Company ... Atlas Shrugged.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
    My MIL is 90 and though not formally diagnosed, is taking drugs intended to treat Alzheimer's (she definitely has symptoms). We weren't worried about her taking a driving test...as many times as she has run into the ditch, into the side of the garage, into anything and everything....we were sure it'd be the "easy" way to take her keys away. I'll be darned if she didn't pass! We managed to get rid of her car through various ruses, but it wasn't easy.

    To whoever asked, in Texas new rules kick in at age 79. Yikes I thought it was older than that! I only have six years to go!!

    https://www.dps.texas.gov/section/dri...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by tutor-turtle 1 year ago
      Yeah. Tough call. When my mom (87) had three fender benders in a year, we politely asked for the keys. Yeah, no one wants their wings clipped. She acquiesced.
      I figure I got 25-30 good years of driving left in me. Will there be a free country to drive in? That's the real question.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 1 year ago
        Sweetheart, My vision is 20/20. My Cognitive reasoning is in perfect order. Yesterday a gentleman mistook me thinking my age was 60. I am 86.Let's be nice. I've never even bumped another car and I've had one ticket in all my driving life for 35 in a 30. N
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by tutor-turtle 1 year ago
          That's awesome.
          Mom had 20/20 and was fully cognizant till her last breath. I think she didn't realize her motor skills had slowed as much as they did, and she still drove like she was 40. Fast. As I said, little bumps into the car in front of her. never even enough for an insurance claim, just enough of a warning sign she wasn't slowing down to her skill level. I think she was just as happy being chauffeured around.
          My Father-in-law, Andrew, passed away at 85, he drove to the golf course three times a week and to the poker game on Friday nights till the day he passed. Andrew never had an incident, and he grew up driving in Boston traffic. He drove like it. Even taxi cabs gave way. Yet, never a ding.

          There is a stanza from a James McMurty -"Fuller Brush Salesman" about his parents driving technique. Certainly applied to mine:

          "Blood-stained blacktops twist up between the wheels. Before we knew it it was all too real
          The voice of reason confined to the past
          And all that mattered was to get there fast"

          Picture this" My step father (who never had a ding or a ticket) would drive the '64 Country Squire wagon (390ci 4-bl, dual exhaust, bias ply tires) down the Maine turnpike (concrete) 85-90 mph with five kids in the back.. pulling a trailer, and getting passed by other cars... pulling their trailers. (Speed limit was, and still is, 75 in the long sections away from the cities) The concrete is long gone.
          Those WWII vets never lost the need for the that adrenaline rush.
          As kids we knew just how fast we were going by the speed of the thumps of the expansion joints of the concrete highway. When it sounded to sound like a drum roll, we knew we were flying.
          The speedometers on most cars topped out at 120. Back then everyone wanted to "bury the needle" at least once. Used to scare the hell out of me as a little kid. I'd hide on the back seat floor. Yet in all that time, I only knew of one person my parents generation to die in a wreck. He got airborne on Middlesex Turnpike (a.k.a. Roller Coaster Road) on, what is appropriately named, "Dead Man's Curve."
          Whereas the next generation had ever faster cars and as it would seem, less skill, they were getting in wrecks all the time. In those days the newspapers would show the wreckage, and the bloody bodies, on the front page, above the fold.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 1 year ago
    I took my one and only drivers test 56 years ago at age 15 in a manual 3 speed on the column dodge. My tester was an idiot who knew nothing about a manual transmission vehicle and tried to gig me for using both feet while on a hill at a traffic light. I had to side step the brake and gas pedals while letting the clutch out so I didn't roll backwards. I just turned to her and said, apparently you have never driven a stick shift car.
    What caused you to have to take the test now?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 year ago
    She didn't like my parallel parking either and said I could come over anytime and 'practice'. Oh yeah, drive 42 miles round trip to the DPS place and I am the caregiver for my disabled veteran son on oxygen 7/24? I didn't signal. In a slab behind the DPS building? Back up 25 mph holding your speed until I tell you to stop? My car odometer doesn't recognize a speed when you are backing up? Ta Da. I am challenging her decision of course. N
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by NealS 1 year ago
      You should take the test in my RAM, it parallel parks itself. I'd never back up at 25 mph, but when I do backup I mostly use the rear camera, and the sensors won't allow me to hit anything, the brakes slam on at about 2 inches from an object. When I first got the truck I had the brakes lock up in the auto car wash. The operator just stood there with his hands on his head and screamed at me. I didn't know how to shut that feature off, but figured it out in about 30 seconds. Meanwhile the vehicle pusher was going thump, thump, thump under my truck, That was a fun day, and a learning experience for an old man.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by bobsprinkle 1 year ago
        How does that work these days? Is a self parallel parking vehicle allowed?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by NealS 1 year ago
          You push the park button, it finds the next parking spot. Let go of the wheel and follow the instructions, you control the throttle, transmission direction, and the brake, it does all the steering. Do not touch the steering wheel or it will cancel. I've only used it twice, not a lot need for it, and it worked flawlessly. Quite accurate between the lines, or between other vehicles. I assume it's legal, they sell it, and you are still in control (responsible). I also like the front and rear cameras, and the warnings starting about a foot, with the brakes automatically locking up at about 1-1/2" from a wall or other object. The brakes are not just applied, they are dynamited, so I wait for the one foot warning signal and stop myself. I don't need to be 1-1/2" from an object. Great tools for women drivers (sexist talk), and old men (of which I am in that category).
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 1 year ago
    Yeah, in my State we actually do have the law on the books where you end up stopping twice: once before you actually get to the sign and a second time when you can actually see enough of the intersection to pull in safely. It's really dumb and no sane LEO enforces the first one. It only comes into play on driving tests...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
      Let me see if I can paste this from the Texas Driver Manual. Nope, so I will type it out.

      Stop Sign Description: Stop: a Red stop sign with white letters or a yellow sign with black letters. The stop sign means come to a complete stop, yield to pedestrians or other vehicles, and then proceed carefully. Stop before the crosswalk, intersection, or stop sign. This applies to each vehicle that comes to the sign. Slowing down is not adequate.

      In a different section: Wihte Stop Lines (does not mention red stop signs): White stop lines are painted across the pavement lanes at traffic signs or signals. Where these lines are present, you are required to stop behind the stop line. (emphasis mine.)

      That's all I see, though my search was rather cursory.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ herndonrd 1 year ago
    When we moved to Texas (from the People's republic of Colorado) my wife had to take the driving test because, in the confusion of moving, her CO license expired. She "failed" because she nudged the curb while parking. They gave her a temp and before she could go back and take the test again, they sent her the permanent license (good for 9 years).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 1 year ago
    Everyone has to have a state approved drivers licnese. There are a LOT of crazy drivers who cause accidents and even get into them sometimes. Licensure didnt stop that, despite government rules and regulations. Stop trusting government to be on OUR side.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
      I don't think any of us are trusting government to be "on our side." This is more a situation of whether or not we will be able to drive past a certain age, legally or otherwise. Different states handle it differently but it is significant to lose one's ability and/or license to drive. I am not really looking forward to it, and if I do lose my driver license, I will have to move. DFW is not pedestrian friendly.

      My MIL, as I discussed above, has a small apartment in an "independent living" facility. They have a van that takes residents who don't/can't drive various places around their smallish town. Tyler, Texas is FAR removed in almost every factor, from DFW. So, her not having a car is not a problem. ME not having a car is going to be a huge problem.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 1 year ago
        I am getting to that age too. I will have to figure out a way to keep driving one way or another. I dont think it should be the government to make that decision for me.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
          I am sympathetic to your reasons and I understand what you are saying. Just remember there's more to it than the "government telling me," because they are not making the decision for YOU; they are making the decision for whoever you might hit. There's NO reason good enough to make up for running over and killing some hapless person who doesn't know and can't help the fact that you can't drive as well as you think you can. NOW, please don't be mad: all those things may not be true, but at some point they certainly will be if you live long enough. There IS a time to quit driving, but I honestly think at least in Texas, the state is TOO lenient. What a horrible way to spend your last years, in jail for reckless endangerment, or worse. Best wishes for that to not every happen to you.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by term2 1 year ago
            Believe me, I do not want to kill anyone or have an accident. The drivers here in vegas who DO have licenses are in general TERRIBLE drivers. If and when I get to the point that I dont feel comfortable driving, I will stop. I dont do backpacking anymore for the same reasons. I dont drive nearly as much as I used to anyway, particularly in rush hour. Government bureaucrats are notoriously bad at their job of regulating licensure. I dont think they should be telling people who can drive or not
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
              I understand, and of course I was not in any way accusing you of wanting to kill someone or have an accident.

              I also drive a lot less but I still have to drive. I don't drive after dark in wet conditions (which can be a real pain in the winter) and I never, ever, drive on ice or snow. (of course nothing in Vegas like that for you! :-) ) After my cataract surgery, I see LESS well, not better (as was advertised to me). My husband has never liked to drive, so he lets me do it for him except after dark. I've been driving since I was 14. I got a ticket when I was 15, and not a single one since. Funny (I'm in a rambling mood - feel free to ignore....) when hubby and I were dating (early 40s) one of his "test" questions was to ask me if I had any tickets or accidents. That's because a history of tickets/accidents cost a lot of money in auto insurance, and he wanted someone who wasn't going to cost him a ton of money. Of course, I still DO cost him a bunch, just not in auto insurance!
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by term2 1 year ago
                Interesting that you see less well AFTER the cataract surgery. I suspect I will be a candidate for that at some point, and its distressing that I might see less well after it also.

                Lenin advertised that the way to bring down a capitalist country is to destroy its money, which is what is happening right now. Its been hard for me during this last inflation (which I suspect is not over) to balance income and expenses.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by $ gharkness 1 year ago
                  At least 99% of the people I know who have had the cataract surgery say that it's an improvement. In my case, I have experienced additional "floaters," I can see the edges of the lenses inside my eyes, and my eyes itch almost constantly. I suppose the itching is not a "change" in vision, but the other two are.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 year ago
    As I mentioned earlier to Dobiian, I contested the little heifer's grading. I requested a response to her lies and suggested she was probably doing this to other people. If I don't get a reply I'll go up the list all the way to the Governor. N
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo