Police MURDER Innocent Man Who Does Not Consent To Tyranny
Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 1 month ago to Government
Excerpt:
"An interesting thing about government – about government workers – is that they can legally do things that would be criminal under the law if we were to do them.
This begs the question about the morality of what government does – unless one takes the position that legality and morality are synonymous. In which case it is hard to understand why the leaders of National Socialist Germany – always important spell out the socialism that was at the core of that murderous regime – were prosecuted after World War II, given that the crimes they were charged with weren’t criminal, as a matter of (German National Socialist) law.
Government morality seems to boil down to this: If you do not follow its laws, government workers will – ultimately – kill you.
A young man named Chase Allen, who was 25-years-old, is dead because of a chain of events that began when a government worker decided to enforce a law requiring his car (all cars) to be “registered” with the government. Chase did not believe he had a moral obligation to “register” his car with the government and so he didn’t, apparently.
You may think the government has the right to enforce such laws, though it is difficult to understand how “government” – which isn’t a living being – can have any rights at all. It certainly has power, of course – but then, so did the National Socialists in Germany."
Original report:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...
----------------------------------------------------------
Government is out of control.
Agents of government are not being trained to honor individual rights guaranteed by the US constitution.
Instead they are provided with military weapons and trained to shoot first and ask questions later.
"An interesting thing about government – about government workers – is that they can legally do things that would be criminal under the law if we were to do them.
This begs the question about the morality of what government does – unless one takes the position that legality and morality are synonymous. In which case it is hard to understand why the leaders of National Socialist Germany – always important spell out the socialism that was at the core of that murderous regime – were prosecuted after World War II, given that the crimes they were charged with weren’t criminal, as a matter of (German National Socialist) law.
Government morality seems to boil down to this: If you do not follow its laws, government workers will – ultimately – kill you.
A young man named Chase Allen, who was 25-years-old, is dead because of a chain of events that began when a government worker decided to enforce a law requiring his car (all cars) to be “registered” with the government. Chase did not believe he had a moral obligation to “register” his car with the government and so he didn’t, apparently.
You may think the government has the right to enforce such laws, though it is difficult to understand how “government” – which isn’t a living being – can have any rights at all. It certainly has power, of course – but then, so did the National Socialists in Germany."
Original report:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...
----------------------------------------------------------
Government is out of control.
Agents of government are not being trained to honor individual rights guaranteed by the US constitution.
Instead they are provided with military weapons and trained to shoot first and ask questions later.
The kid did not reach for the gun which was on the floor. It is visible that his hands were always near the steering wheel and the door. He would have to lean over and down to reach the gun. He didn't. The policeman who saw the gun on the floor reacted to the fact that a gun was there. The kid made no mention of it, did not threaten to use it, and did not reach for it.
Don't try to educate the ignorant. Be polite and compliant. The state does not have the right to indebt your property and make you pay to use it, and that is irrelevant because every court will claim that right. The arguments for liberty in this situation cannot be won because of the current acceptance of the public and all levels of government declaring that it is their right.
It's still not clear since it is not the cam from the policeman who went inside to force out the driver, and this cam is blocked by that policeman.
The police cams should be public record and the original digital video should be
available to determine if the cops overstepped or the guy killed was just foolish or both.
I agree with that.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPPJ96QFfX4
Are they hiding something?
We don't know that either.
The police cams should be public record and the original digital video should be
available to determine if the cops overstepped or the guy killed was just foolish or both.
This could be another case of government agents hiding the evidence
- similar to the results of vaccine side effects, mask effectiveness, etc.
Without full disclosure, we don't know.
Warrant Next time? What is he gonna do in between. How many warrants are there gonna be for all the illegal aliens in America who do not show up for their court date? At some point the warrants become useless paper.
IF I had a link to the entire video I could watch it and decide for myself. The video in the link has been edited from several different sources.
"Police Chief Eric Johnsen shared a compilation of body camera footage from the five officers involved and dash camera video from the incident"
Police are human beings. They could be mistaken about seeing a gun and trying to hide that act.
Shouting "GUN,GUN,GUN" does not mean there was a gun in the hand of the driver.
It means that whoever started shouting thought he saw a gun, and others repeated what they heard.
The video is public record and the public should have full access, not just an edited version created by an unknown person.
If you are asking 'do I trust the police?', the answer is "NO."
The free individual is the only thing that stands in the way of tyranny.
The courts obviously have little if any concern for justice any longer.
The police close ranks and hide the evidence any time their actions are questionable.
The local authorities should just release all the video and the police should
make their case with all the evidence in view.
He may have acted foolishly, but the entire policing situation should be reassessed and
police should never put anyone in a position of pulling a gun when the only thing the
police are doing is collecting a tax for the looting scum in power.
I'd string up the guys who put the police in that position and set an example for petty tyrants everywhere.
Armed police should not be used for petty tax collection.
Speed traps should also be a felony, imo.
If he had a gun and drew it in this situation behaving like that, he deserved death by cop.
I completely agree police often behave badly, they systematically abuse and somehow have “special rights” that civilians don’t get. For example they get out of speeding tickets, and in many states, can possess and vary firearms (even in retirement) that we “peasants” can’t have. Oh, all this and the highest instance of domestic violence of any profession. I just don’t see this as a likely example of that entitled behavior.
In the context of 'who was harmed' by his action, the acts of the police were acts of tyranny.
Many acts of governments today are tyranny under the original constitution and bill of rights.
I still want to see the entire video. I saw no gun in his hand (or on his body) in the clip that was released.
Load more comments...