Folks on shots and mandates.
Our Nickursis posted this comment and It deserves its own post.
“Folks, on shots and mandates. Fact: There is NO FDA approved vaccine in the U.S. The one they "approved" is made in Germany, has not even got its labeling approved and is not available. The Pfizer EUA was extended. Ergo, all three shots are still EUA. That means they need your consent. They cannot mandate, or require a EUA shot. Period. Need to find a good lawyer and strike back. Issue is corrupt Judges, ignoring the obvious, but that can be appealed, and, if worse come to worse, you have to decide, HOWEVER, you will have one hell of a lawsuit for damages. If you gave up and/or forced to "retire" or quit, keep all your records and proof you were forced out, get emails, letters etc, and hang on, as this is far from over. Think about it,: FDA "approves" a nonexistent vaccine, in such a mush mouth way people assume it is the current Pfizer one. Then comes the "mandate" . People assume all is up and up. But read the actual approvals and such and you find out it was all another lie. I am sure some companies never think, or research, just react. There is no official mandate, OSHA never made one, it was just a "white House Press Release". Also, you can demand the list of ingredients, which is not available for any of the three, same for Flu shot. You must be provided that before a shot can be administered, but only if you ask for it. Demand proof of all the above. If your employer says, get shot or quit, then ask employer what approved shots are available, then have that FDA approval letter, and say "This one"? If they say yes, ask to see vial. Make them go do their homework. My employer chose to ignore the whole thing (120K company) and seems to just want to wait it out, as they have some pretty good risk lawyers who probably saw they are screwed either way, but a mandate would subject them to Nuremberg Law violations as well as damages and lawsuits.“
“Folks, on shots and mandates. Fact: There is NO FDA approved vaccine in the U.S. The one they "approved" is made in Germany, has not even got its labeling approved and is not available. The Pfizer EUA was extended. Ergo, all three shots are still EUA. That means they need your consent. They cannot mandate, or require a EUA shot. Period. Need to find a good lawyer and strike back. Issue is corrupt Judges, ignoring the obvious, but that can be appealed, and, if worse come to worse, you have to decide, HOWEVER, you will have one hell of a lawsuit for damages. If you gave up and/or forced to "retire" or quit, keep all your records and proof you were forced out, get emails, letters etc, and hang on, as this is far from over. Think about it,: FDA "approves" a nonexistent vaccine, in such a mush mouth way people assume it is the current Pfizer one. Then comes the "mandate" . People assume all is up and up. But read the actual approvals and such and you find out it was all another lie. I am sure some companies never think, or research, just react. There is no official mandate, OSHA never made one, it was just a "white House Press Release". Also, you can demand the list of ingredients, which is not available for any of the three, same for Flu shot. You must be provided that before a shot can be administered, but only if you ask for it. Demand proof of all the above. If your employer says, get shot or quit, then ask employer what approved shots are available, then have that FDA approval letter, and say "This one"? If they say yes, ask to see vial. Make them go do their homework. My employer chose to ignore the whole thing (120K company) and seems to just want to wait it out, as they have some pretty good risk lawyers who probably saw they are screwed either way, but a mandate would subject them to Nuremberg Law violations as well as damages and lawsuits.“
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
As you posted the other day. The same type of bullshp is AG Garlands son in law sells the CRT garbage and Garland declares parents complaining about the product as terrorists.
Seems like crony capitalism at its worst.
No one was punished. The FBI was, in fact, rewarded for burning people alive.
Clinton and Reno should have been executed for it.
It has recently occurred to me that virtually everyone resisting the vaccine is a Trump supporter. By targeting these people, the totalitarians are crushing the funding against them.
In the same way, the FBI targeting parents and groups against the CRT is a disgusting totalitarian approach. It is absolutely astonishing this is happening in broad daylight.
But lots of countries are still violating this. The Italians and Australians are now in mob rebellion to stop their lives from being destroyed. We will be soon if the courts don't strike it down.
It is not available anywhere, there is no time stated for availability, any differences between it and the -not-yet-approved- are unclear.
How that one got approval and the identical(?) others have not is not explained.
What gives? Some Obscure legal requirement maybe.
Perhaps it is just a marketing tool to further confuse/fool the populous.
the injection of a serum that is experimental should be well recieved.
and the EUA was based on the lie of no effective treatment
the issue however, is how many of us can afford to fight this?
i know i cannot
so i am Going Galt at work
i see nothing
i say mothing
no matter what is broken, it is no longer my responsibility
also the Health Care place i work for told us in am email the shots were safe
when this is proven false, i intend to sue them for malpractice.
they took on the role of my healthcare provider, by demanding that i get this shot
THEY voluntarily took on this role
they violated Informed Consent
they violent Federal Law
they violated the Nurnberg Policy against human experimentation
they MUST reap the whirlwind they so richly deserve