10

New York Times sells out the US to China for a mere S100,000 a month

Posted by freedomforall 3 months, 3 weeks ago to Politics
11 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"How cheap was it for the Chinese Communist Party to buy the American media? Like adding a room to a house.

Practically nothing.

The New York Times, the “paper of record” since 1851 in the USA became a tool for China for just $100,000 a month. It put stories out for years that were essentially nothing but Communist advertising. They and other newspapers had a deal with state run China Daily which sanitized and covered up human rights abuses like Uigher concentration camps.

The Washington Free Beacon reported that the former “stories” were suddenly deleted:
Acting guilty, what?

The New York Times quietly deleted hundreds of advertorials that the Chinese Communist Party paid to publish on its website.

China Daily, an official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, has been purchasing advertorial spaces in the pages of mainstream U.S. media outlets for the last decade, using the space to disseminate Chinese propaganda to millions of unassuming Americans. In return, U.S. newspapers such as the Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal received millions of dollars.

The NYT has run over 200 advertorials over the last decade,

Key newspapers helped to hide that SARS 2 was lableak and a potential bioweapon. There is blood on their hands.

The leading newspapers covered up for Anthony Fauci and the Chinese communists as a deadly disease spread."

Report From Tucker Carlson:
https://youtu.be/CtOjn2g8Xkk
"Every one was a (pro-China) propaganda piece made to look like a news article."
The NYT wasn't the only one. The LA Times and WAPO also published such China ads posing as news articles.
SOURCE URL: https://joannenova.com.au/2021/08/ny-times-sells-out-the-us-to-china-for-s100000-a-month/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 11
    Posted by mccannon01 3 months, 3 weeks ago
    Actually, the NYT has slid so far left I'm surprised it didn't offer free space to the CCP instead of requiring payment.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 3 months, 3 weeks ago
      The NYT does publish socialist/statist/dictatorship biased pieces (pretending to be news) that condone China's actions all the time at no charge, e.g., all the apologist stories about how it's racist to claim that the China virus was produced by China in Wuhan.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mccannon01 3 months, 3 weeks ago
        Good point.

        During one of his press conferences (actually a sham event where the POTUS Trump was supposed to stand there and let the MSMM slap him around) he had a great opportunity to make this clear, but didn't do a good job of it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 3 months, 3 weeks ago
          The MSM responses always showed his comments in the worst light possible. He would strongly protest something as a lie and they would claim it was 'debunked' when the evidence was exactly as Trump said.
          It's typical of 1930's Germany state propaganda: say a lie loudly and often, and the lie becomes accepted as if it was true by those who can't think logically and rationally. Yet those idiots are still allowed to vote (early and often.)
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Misanthropic-Shrugger 3 months, 3 weeks ago
      I cannot recall when, but when pressed, their editorial staff admitted freely and publicly, that they cater to a leftist audience and that's their bread and butter. Paraphrasing, but I was proud that they finally admitted it. It never got picked-up by the rest of the "media" because they are all in the same tank together. LOL
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 3 months, 3 weeks ago
    Naming the various newsprint papers is a waste of time and effort. All you need to know is there are a handful of very wealthy individuals who own the majority of all the MSM in this and many other countries. The only reason Tucker still has his job at FNC is because Rupert Murdoch keeps him and a few others around as cover.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 3 months, 3 weeks ago
      Rupert isn't running Fox anymore. His son is. And Tucker and Sean Hannity are #1 and #2 in ratings. Fox can't afford to drop them without losing a ton of revenue.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by GaryL 3 months, 3 weeks ago
        Like father like son but FNC was better before his idiot son or sons took over and went full liberal with the exception of Hannity, Tucker and Jeanine. I do agree they are the main revenue sources for a once great network that has found the flush lever. Newsmax and OANN are now my Go To for the real news and with excellent programming in the same time slots.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 3 months, 3 weeks ago
    Listening to those slimy swamp dwelling Fake News shills turned me dino's (albeit a carnivorous) stomach to such an extent I could only watch 75% of the video until I became too repulsed to watch any more.
    +1 despite that. So many snowflakes who prefer Fake News=too many sheeple shielded from the truth by sold-out traitors.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by tohar1 3 months, 3 weeks ago
    It's why I skip over the old Grey Lady and get the vast majority of my news from The Epoch Times. NO BS reporting!! Actually very well done for the most part, and not too expensive either.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo