Why get vaccinated?
So far during my life time, people have been vaccinated in order to avoid getting a disease – polio, measles, etc. After we were vaccinated, we didn’t have to worry about getting that disease.
So I have to ask, what is the purpose of the Covid vaccine? If it is in fact a legitimate vaccine, once you are vaccinated, you should be immune and if not why get the vaccine at all? If you are immune, why would you care if I get the vaccine?
So I have to ask, what is the purpose of the Covid vaccine? If it is in fact a legitimate vaccine, once you are vaccinated, you should be immune and if not why get the vaccine at all? If you are immune, why would you care if I get the vaccine?
Prior to the Gulag, unvaxxed will be social pariahs. I won't be surprised if their credit cards and debit cards are cancelled, bank accounts closed.
On the bright side there will be a big black market in vaxx papers.
Where are Your papers, comrade?
My son was permanently disabled by vaccines. My dad would have been alive today had he not taken every vaccine he could get his hands on. One close friend lost her son at 16 due to complications of a flu shot (who'd have thunk that?) and another friend's son will spend his life in a wheelchair as a paraplegic due to a reaction to vaccination as a child. These victims are nameless, faceless to most because the MSM will repeatedly lie to you about the risks. The vaccine locomotive is barreling down the tracks now and I don't see it getting stopped. I hope I'm wrong - But, the question as to "why" get vaccinated is close to be a moot point...You're going to get vaccinated...
Unfortunately, those who call us antivaxxers, are neither rational nor logical. They don’t know how to think. They are conformists and not objectivists.
Second, your point about why care about my status has been the case for DECADES.
If you are protected, AWESOME, leave me alone.
But they can't.
It's about power, control, and profit. That's it!
Now wargame out the scenario.
As always, your choice is your choice. No coercion intended. And there is no way of knowing the possible long term effects.
And keep in mind that even using the CDCs numbers. SARS-COV2 ver 1.0 has AT WORST a 2% mortality. I’ve lost 2 close friends to this. So, I’m not downplaying the disease. It’s REAL. But, I feel it’s not as prevalent as the fear mongering would have us believe. The truth, as usual, is somewhere in the middle.
It’s a personal choice that should NEVER be coerced.
I have that. Other people, who have different risk profiles might reasonably make other decisions.
In general, there is no reason for me to wear a mask, although I probably would if I were visiting someone with an active case of Covid -- vaccines just give your own immune system an edge, they aren't absolute.
We are being forced to wear masks in LA county essentially so that we will turn on the people who do not get vaccinated and force them to do so.
Interestingly, the other day I actually found a scientific mask study -- not a scientific argument or a model: the Danish mask study DANMASK-19. They had approximately 3000 people wearing masks and 3000 not. Of the ones without masks, 2.1% got Covid-19. Of the ones with masks 1.8% got Covid. The difference was not statistically significant. It shows some mild advantage but certainly nothing that would support a mandate.
As a confirmation to this, the Blaze published a study done which looked at infection rates by county throughout the entire United States and compared the counties according to whether or not they had a mask mandate in place. Those who had a mask mandate had a 10% HIGHER incidence of COVID infections.
(This doesn't even cover the decreased oxygen levels in those who wear masks - up to 20% decrease in even common cotton masks.)
and used in a medical experiment for reason not fully known at this time
The disease is real, it really kills people it attacks via an ACE2 receptor which I may have more of because my ACE2 inhibitor blood pressure medicine I've been taking for almost 20 years. I am 69 and, while not in the most risky group, certainly higher on the risk pattern.
I tracked the study and the reports of it. It was emergency use because the FDA rushed it. By rushed it doesn't mean they skipped steps what they skipped was the waiting for months to get a meeting that drug companies usually go through. They also overlapped steps.
Most reactions to vaccinations happen rather quickly as the immune system reacts. That was adequately tested by the large number of clinical trials that had to be completed for a month. While vaccines could have long term consequences that is a lower risk.
It is a risk, life is a risk. I made the judgement that it was less of a risk to take the vaccine.
Other people have different profiles and a lot of things are being said on both side of the issue that simply aren't true.
I'm comfortable with my decision.
I take it a bit further and refuse to divulge my "vaccine status" to anyone that isn't within my immediate family. And I make no excuses about that either.
I spent much time studying the risks, contemplated the possibility of side effects and spoke to a doctor I trust who recommended I take the shot (actually two of Moderna). So did a concerned daughter-in-law who is a nurse. Should my decision backfire, all I can say is what the Scorpion King said before he became one in that movie, "Live free and die well."
Me dino respects anyone's free will decision to take it, not to take it or like gharkness to just tell people it's none of their business if they so want.
No government entity has any any right to force anyone to do anything in regard to their medical privacy.
IMO, physically fit people, young people and most especially children should not be vaccinated or forced to wear masks.
I no longer wear a mask. To hell with that. Took what I thought was my best shot at the time. Get it? Ha! Ha! Live free and die well.
I've done the same, it is not all one way but I think for me it is more of a risk to take the vax.
I am particularly bothered by the long term uncertainties especially the fact that the spike protein created by the mRNA vax does penetrate to areas where it could be dangerous, not what is claimed to stay where it is put.
I have doubts about that ACE2 receptor blood pressure medication making you more susceptible, it could work the other way.
SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection relies on the binding of S protein (Spike glycoprotein) to ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) 2 in the host cells.
Paradoxically, ACE2 is protective in the cardiovascular system, and SARS-CoV-1 S protein promotes lung injury by decreasing the level of ACE2 in the infected lungs.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.11...
Ask and don’t seek out the answers are at serious
Risk of permanent harm or death.
I waited months before I got it to see what was happening with side effects. Seemed pretty safe, so I took the plunge in march 2020, as I suspected that as time went on the virus would become stronger and more agile. So far, people around me vaccinated and not vaccinated have contracted it, but I have been spared.
I stayed away from large crowds in small spaces like elevators, night clubs, etc. Tried to keep my immune system up, and pretty much stayed away from other people unless necessary. Worked so far even before getting vaxxed, so I dont know if the vaccine really helped.
So, I had Chicken Pox as a child. If my children have chicken pox, wouldn't I test positive for Chicken Pox antibodies?
Essentially there are usually 2 or 3 target spots on the virus that they run through a genetic multiplication process to make enough copies to detect. If they detect none, then it's negative, however there is also how many cycles of amplification you do before you no longer count it. This is typically 35 to 40 cycles.
This can generate 'false' positives. In a way they aren't really false. That genetic material was found in your sample. Now it could be a contamination or it could be a small enough of an amount that it has no clinical effect on you.
The deep state are so desperate to usher in the One world Govt which will be a Technocracy. That they inflate the counts of cases and deaths to kill small business. This week the CDC stopped the special use authorization for this PCR test due to its inaccuracy. Coincidentally the Soros Gates team buys a test company in England at the same time. Wow what great investors they are.
If it tests positive I would bet that there is at least part of the actual virus in the sample. Whether that is clinically significant becomes a question at high amplification.
Either way the so called test is flawed and should never have been used as the CDC just admitted
Even though the inventor of the process said it was not appropriate for the use of testing for the China Flu or as you say SARS-COV-2. and yes his message was censored. BTW the CDC Claimed the Flu was detected as SARS-COV2. Why is that?
If it is positive, there is almost certainly some of the SARS-COV2 in your sample. Whether it is enough to be concerned about is the question. Too much amplification leads to 'positive results' without any clinical significance.
I looked for at the Flu and think you have misread it. A multi-plex PCR test will detect a number of genetic targets. There are kits being produced that not only detect the genetic targets for SARS-COV-2 but also Influenza A and B. Note that they don't just say positive, they say which targets were detected. So your result could be "SARS-COV-2 Neg" "INFLUENZA A Neg" "INFLUENZA B Pos"
This is useful because when someone presents with flu-like symptoms it is nice to have a single test which checks for all three viruses at once.
They are phasing it out because there are newer tests coming online which use molecular target matching and do not have the risk of misinterpretation that PCR can have.
Note PCR has been used to monitor AIDS since the 1990's, its a solid technique. It does require expertise to manage correctly and in the ramp-up we had people releasing false positives.
If you expect that laboratory tests are always perfect and give the right answer, you are mistaken. They are sometimes wrong for a variety of technical reasons depending upon the handling and methodology.
So my rule for laboratory work is that if you get a lab test with an unexpected concerning result not supported by your symptoms, run it again before taking action.
CDC urges labs to use COVID tests that can differentiate from flu.
The CDC urged laboratories to "save both time and resources" by introducing kits that can determine and distinguish a positive test for the coronavirus and flu.
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses," the agency said Wednesday.
Laboratories will have until the close of 2021 before the CDC officially withdrawals its Emergency Use Authorization of the Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rXg0hK... https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-new...
Smallpox, Polio, Measles, Mumps and Rubella have entered the chat
Real Vaccines WORK.
You violate John Galt’s creed imo
“I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine“
By trying to require another human to take the risk of an experimental jab that has already killed thousands so you feel comfortable is against everything the fictitious John Galt stood for.
Any way, talking with my wife who is in agreement with the statement that I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees I said this is what I will ask someone who is saying I should get the vaccine. How many shots will you take for me to make me comfortable?