

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
As a computer scientist/programmer/engineer (mechanical by training) I know that we need to re-think problems from scratch, but we should do and evaluate the 'new' ideas with understanding the older ideas and implementations so we don't throw out the 'baby with the bath water'.
IMHO we got scared when a shuttle or two went down. As a society we are so 'event risk adverse' rather than being 'system risk averse' (we would rather lose a few thousand people a year in cars than less than a dozen in a shuttle crash or 300 in an aircraft crash). We have also traded 3000 lives (think 9/11 here) for 10,000 or more service peoples lives, let alone non-combatants on the 'other side'. -- I am not pro or anti-war. War, like any other endeavor of humanity, is just another balance we all need to reach collectively our value equation balance. I just wish we had had a Reagan around to deal with them.
Thanks for posting!
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-07-17/e...