Another Covid cure...to add to HQC...I am sure CNN will report on this any day...it is only Earth shaking: https://www.messenger.com/messenger_m...

They mixed ingredience from one side of the factory with the other....But, don't worry. It's safe.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-he...

FWIW:

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/sci...

To anybody who's interested go look through the VAERS database yourself. It's a fascinating read. As I point out elsewhere, note the dates. The first report I saw on deaths post-vaxx covered a bunch of people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s - some found dead where they worked. These were the early recipients who were front-line workers.

Because I went to the CDC VAERS data assuming CDC wouldn't pull such a joke. But...hey, you never know. Ha...

The data I looked at was Pfizer. Eventually I looked at both and Moderna was milder.

Pregnancy is tracked on its own...making me assume they think vaccinating a pregnant woman is a reportable event. And, look at available dates on VAERS. This is covering when they were vaccinating front-line healthcare workers, not the general public. So, they hadn't purposely vaccinated thousands of pregnant women at that point. This vaccine wasn't tested on pregnant women from what a read. So...these numbers are not out of "say 50 million". Go look at VAERS and see what data you can dredge up keeping in mind the dates.

Yeah...but I bet it WON'T be added.

Finally some statistics. I know what happens and how, but not how many, until now. The virus will not have killed as many as the complications set up by mRNA vaccine before it is all over. These immigrants were asked to show up just as vaccines had been given to most, but they came early. No one in media putting together that this is the other strains needed for the vaccine to really set off deaths. CDC called it "impending doom", yes in teh millions. The vaccine has already killed, but faced with another virus, it will lead to the immune system killing our own body.

Interesting how these statistics compare to COVID. No doubt, less than 0.5% died.

One might think sticking a toothpick into the elderly/infirm people on the early list might be fatal. However, the scarcity of objective data is both appalling and concerning. Just like the number of total deaths in 2020...obscure.

Vaccines obviously work, just like we know what germs are and some basics of the immune system. This one seems unnecessary and fabricated. Can't we just let a few be vaccinated, and let the rest develop the immunities we've had for centuries?

Perhaps there are simply too many people and too much interaction. There are clearly too many people who are not contributing.

Additional thoughts.... 45 spontaneous abortions seems like a LOT. Dozens of families devasted.

I do NOT know what level of feedback through VAERS, compared to the number of vaccinations out there, warrant adding a warning to the vaccination process.

I do know. that anaphylactic shock IS being warned about for the vaccine. I write medical software, the concerns raised caused us to include warnings in our "best practices."

And as the original author indicated here his stats, that warning was added with 192 anaphylactic shock cases noted. So it is quite possible a PREGNANCY WARNING should be added. (anaphylactic shock is typically recoverable - a spontaneous abortion is a "done deal" and not recoverable).

theres a reason vaccines take so long to perfect.

I had decided the risk of vaccination was much less than the risk of getting covid at my advanced age. Who knows what those risks really are. I lived through an entire year NOT getting covid and pretty much living a normal life.

Thanks for the actual info.

How did you decide that is not an April fools joke?

INCORRECT. VAERS is ONLY tracking "Adverse Events" (i.e. the Vaccine "AE" part). And of those that end up in the "Reporting System."

Hence of the 120 pregnant women who REPORTED an AE, 45 of those were spontaneous abortions. Maybe the other 75 were nausea. BUT there may have been 1000, or 100,000 or 1,000,000 women who were pregnant, took the vaccine, but had NO "AE" and hence were not part of the database tally.

So the correct statement is something like: "Of the 120 women reporting an Adverse Event, 45 of them were reporting a spontaneous abortion."

IF Pfizer had 50% of the market, those numbers indicate the number of people reporting an AE out of say 50 million administrations.

I am NOT pro- or anti-vax. I also know that not all the Adverse Events get reported to VAERS, so the numbers could be higher in the number of adverse patient outcomes / instances.

And yet we’re told “everyone must get the shot”
Make a product and then demand everyone buy it, no brainer what’s going on. It’s not free; insurance will be paid by us in the long run. We will pay and the Pharma will profit based on “everyone must have the shot”

My wife also reminded my that her sister almost died. She gained more than 11 pounds of fluid in her abdomen. She had been feeling ill all of Spring Break when they temporarily escaped Oregon to come visit. She had (excitedly at the time) gotten vaccinated only shortly before leaving. The doctors were able to treat her using antibiotics and such, but she can definitely go in the "severe adverse reactions" category.

I found this both interesting and very scary.https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/former-pfizer-...

Hey Abaco...I was going to send this on to some of my peeps, but held off. In the first paragraph you said "Of 120 pregnant women who got the Pfizer vax" In the second paragraph you said, "This is just the Moderna data". Which one is it...Moderna or Pfizer?

I can't speak to most of those figures, but I've read that 20-35% of pregnancies end in spontaneous miscarriage, anyway.

No surprise here. Who wants to be a GMO? Not me!

"people who trust their governments" are damned fools.
"Honest" government has never existed.

My wife will be attending the funeral of a high school friend on Saturday. In the papers it just reported that she died "unexpectedly." After my wife did some digging it turns out that she died of a blood clot in her lung. She had been "vaccinated" only a week prior and hadn't felt good since. Coincidence? Not likely. See Occam's Razor.

Our mate Unapologetic has done some summarizing for us on data from Europe-

https://unapologeticrepublican.com/eu...

Considering the usual time to get a vaccine past the FDA, 5,10 or more years, and looking at these numbers impartially, ignoring the human personal impact, this is not unusual after just one year, reasonable progress. The tragedy/crime is the going public so early, using the public to test on, people who trust their governments to ensure safety.