11

Desperate Democrats Now Want To Place Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

Posted by $ nickursis 4 years, 7 months ago to Government
59 comments | Share | Flag

This is how they fight, if they can't cheat it, cheat bigger. FDR won unconstitutional social security by threatening to pack the court till it ruled for him, and they have never looked back, making the SCOTUS into a joke, since there is no "conservative" or "liberal" parts of it, so why is every judge one of those labels? It has been corrupt for hundreds of years, where criteria was political, not knowledge....


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If they lose the Supreme Court, they lose the only way they have to--as you correctly put it--ram their agenda down our throats. They can't get their crappy legislation passed, so they simply muck the issue up until it hits the Supreme Court. But with five solid conservatives in place, Roberts can no longer rewrite legislation and then declare it constitutional.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 4 years, 7 months ago
    Years ago me dino stopped calling myself a Republican and contributing any $ to the GOP primarily because of spineless (later perceived as also corrupt) RINO behavior.
    That said, the traitorous Democrat Party is far worse and due partly due to TDS has gone bat out of hell completely crazy. The other part of "partly due" is what has become an insane wanton lust for absolute power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 4 years, 7 months ago
    I just can't believe that the Democrats are as slimey or crooked (apparently from top to bottom) as they are! When I and the Democrat party parted ways, they were far more honest an at least showed a modicum of integrity and common sense! No more! The leadership in my estimation should all be doing hard time for high crimes and misdemeanors! In addition, a large swath or the rank & file, for aiding and abetting criminal activities (say! I'll bet those are grounds for wide-reaching RICO indictments and a thorough criminal investigation!)..... For what its worth!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 4 years, 7 months ago
    Actually not a bad idea.....Let's also have term limits on all political offices. There is a ton of dead wood in the Democratic leadership.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 7 months ago
    They already have term limits. Read the Constitution. It does not say they are elected 'for life'. They serve 'during terms of good behavior'.
    I can name some that should have been impeached.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I fail to see how anything with the demonrats is possible after the last three years, or did you go into isolation with COVID? They have been pursuing a coup for three years, and made about a dozen attempts using false information presented as true, and then when confronted up front, Felony Pelosi has alawys said "NO" to any discussions or deals. The only way this will ever happen is for a complete destruction of the demonrat party and a full rebuild, just as has been happening with Republicrats. Haven't you noticed how many Republicrats did not run again in 2018? There was a purge of the RINO population in the last three years, and many were replaced with real patriots like Dan Crenshaw, who have served the country and are trying to serve it now.

    "I can still remember a time when we didn't want to admit to political litmus tests." So, it is ok to have such tests, as long as you admit to them?

    Think of this: it is ILLEGAL to use religion as a basis of qualification for any office. Yet both sides have been doing it for over 40 years just on the abortion thing.

    Think about this too: If the abortion thing is so important to either side, why has it not been done the Constitutional way and proposed as an amendment to the Bill of rights or Constitution, vice making laws with no basis in either, and then asking the court whose job it is to use both documents as guides, to rule on it? Even race is addressed in the Constitutional law package. Yet both parties have made law and counterlaws to fight their war on the American people. Creating the legalistic charade that exists where they can do anything to us, and find some convenient "law" that supports it.

    Packing the Court is just another attempt to ram their agenda down the peoples throats. If they are so sure they know what we want, then do it the right way and add it into either document, otherwise, they need to all shut up and go away, which will never happen till they are all in jail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 4 years, 7 months ago
    People are so short-sighted. If they successfully packed the court, they'd hate term limits. The politicization of it must go. I can still remember a time when we didn't want to admit to political litmus tests. I really want a fair, not partisan, court. It angers me that these clowns politicize it b/c it works for their careers, without regard for what it does to the country. I wish they would get together in private, pick a qualified non-political appointee, and then confirm her in a non-partisan process. It sounds like a dream, but we've done it before. It's certainly possible.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo