COVID19: THE BIGGEST FRAUD: PART 2 – THE VACCINE SWINDLE
Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 8 months ago to Science
"At the end of May there was a significant breakthrough in understanding of COVID antibodies which was not widely reported: a Swiss study from Zurich led by Professor Onur Boyman74 demonstrated that a large proportion of the population had a natural immunity through existing antibodies on the mucous membrane (IgA) or cellular immunity (T cells), likely to have been acquired through previous exposure to coronaviruses such as influenza or the common cold.
This explained why, by July, the virus had all but disappeared in populations like Sweden, New York (Fig. 7) and Wuhan (which reportedly tested its entire population of 11 million and found only 300 cases, all of which were asymptomatic)81 which were significantly affected by a “first wave”: if the ratio of those with IgA and T cell antibodies to IgG and IgM antibodies across population was confirmed at a factor of five then if 20% of the population had traditional IgG and IgM antibodies (such as New York with 21% and London with 17%82) then the virus died out because there was simply no one left for it to infect. It followed that the virus could only survive in population samples where testing showed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies was below 20% (and allowing for their decay probably well below).
Nobel Prize winning biological scientist Michael Levitt had already come to the same conclusion based on a different approach: he predicted that the virus would “burn out” when it had infected 15-20% of the population though based on a pattern predicted by the “Gompertz curve”83 which indicated that the number of deaths after the peak is roughly double those from before84 resulting in Levitt accurately predicting the number of Chinese85 and Swedish deaths86months in advance 87. Levitt has recently bravely predicted that US COVID will “be done in 4 weeks [25 Aug] with a total reported death below 170,000”88, compared to 149,000 today89.
Boyman’s theory on “IgA and T Cell immunity” explained the accuracy of Levitt’s “Gompertz curve” predictions and this was now being backed up by the empirical evidence which showed that the populations which were hit hardest with high initial rates of infection and mortality, were the ones where the virus had almost disappeared. "
This explained why, by July, the virus had all but disappeared in populations like Sweden, New York (Fig. 7) and Wuhan (which reportedly tested its entire population of 11 million and found only 300 cases, all of which were asymptomatic)81 which were significantly affected by a “first wave”: if the ratio of those with IgA and T cell antibodies to IgG and IgM antibodies across population was confirmed at a factor of five then if 20% of the population had traditional IgG and IgM antibodies (such as New York with 21% and London with 17%82) then the virus died out because there was simply no one left for it to infect. It followed that the virus could only survive in population samples where testing showed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies was below 20% (and allowing for their decay probably well below).
Nobel Prize winning biological scientist Michael Levitt had already come to the same conclusion based on a different approach: he predicted that the virus would “burn out” when it had infected 15-20% of the population though based on a pattern predicted by the “Gompertz curve”83 which indicated that the number of deaths after the peak is roughly double those from before84 resulting in Levitt accurately predicting the number of Chinese85 and Swedish deaths86months in advance 87. Levitt has recently bravely predicted that US COVID will “be done in 4 weeks [25 Aug] with a total reported death below 170,000”88, compared to 149,000 today89.
Boyman’s theory on “IgA and T Cell immunity” explained the accuracy of Levitt’s “Gompertz curve” predictions and this was now being backed up by the empirical evidence which showed that the populations which were hit hardest with high initial rates of infection and mortality, were the ones where the virus had almost disappeared. "
Herd immunity- a great range for this is claimed by a variety of experts some good some maybe not. I ask, must this concept exist for every pathogen? This doubt does not fit any of the political sides.
Lockdown- as above, proofs that it works, and that it doesn't, are expressed with much emotion and with science and logic that have some validity but a long way from settling the matter. The answer could be the specifics, locality, conditions, type of infection.. ..
Issues with a vaccine- can it work? how long would it take to test to the usual standards? How fast does the target mutate? So would a vaccine have to be redone every year? Compulsory on children and adults? You can have your own answers to those questions, anyway, it mean big big money.
Thus, competition must be squelched. There are alternatives treatments and (maybe) cures. Therefore no limit to the suppression and censoring of these, and preventing large scale tests being done, and there is appalling character assassination, events over the last week, eg on the Nigerian born Texas doctor.
Vaccine, there is a very good comment on-
http://joannenova.com.au/2020/07/new-...
and see the comment below that
1. Koch’s postulate. The identification of a unique entity, has not been done in this case, so unlikely that a vaccine can be made.
2. PCR test design. polymerase chain reaction. The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, said, “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.“
3. WHO benefits. WHO, vaccine research, big pharma, big government, big noters.
Even worse when medical professionals turn political, Fauci, and have a major stake in the game with drug makers.
YUP, take your HCQ with Zink and even a Z pack if your idiot political leaders have not yet banned it.
Better yet, send your idiot political leaders to the unemployment lines as they have done to us.
People just can't allow him to be right.
Trump is often an insulting arrogant boor, but sometimes he is quite prescient.
That used to be called leadership.
Take your Hydroxychloroquine with Zinc and call us in the morning...