10

COVID19: THE BIGGEST FRAUD: PART 2 – THE VACCINE SWINDLE

Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 11 months ago to Science
20 comments | Share | Flag

"At the end of May there was a significant breakthrough in understanding of COVID antibodies which was not widely reported: a Swiss study from Zurich led by Professor Onur Boyman74 demonstrated that a large proportion of the population had a natural immunity through existing antibodies on the mucous membrane (IgA) or cellular immunity (T cells), likely to have been acquired through previous exposure to coronaviruses such as influenza or the common cold.

This explained why, by July, the virus had all but disappeared in populations like Sweden, New York (Fig. 7) and Wuhan (which reportedly tested its entire population of 11 million and found only 300 cases, all of which were asymptomatic)81 which were significantly affected by a “first wave”: if the ratio of those with IgA and T cell antibodies to IgG and IgM antibodies across population was confirmed at a factor of five then if 20% of the population had traditional IgG and IgM antibodies (such as New York with 21% and London with 17%82) then the virus died out because there was simply no one left for it to infect. It followed that the virus could only survive in population samples where testing showed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies was below 20% (and allowing for their decay probably well below).

Nobel Prize winning biological scientist Michael Levitt had already come to the same conclusion based on a different approach: he predicted that the virus would “burn out” when it had infected 15-20% of the population though based on a pattern predicted by the “Gompertz curve”83 which indicated that the number of deaths after the peak is roughly double those from before84 resulting in Levitt accurately predicting the number of Chinese85 and Swedish deaths86months in advance 87. Levitt has recently bravely predicted that US COVID will “be done in 4 weeks [25 Aug] with a total reported death below 170,000”88, compared to 149,000 today89.

Boyman’s theory on “IgA and T Cell immunity” explained the accuracy of Levitt’s “Gompertz curve” predictions and this was now being backed up by the empirical evidence which showed that the populations which were hit hardest with high initial rates of infection and mortality, were the ones where the virus had almost disappeared. "


All Comments

  • Posted by Stormi 4 years, 11 months ago
    Living in an agricultural area, I have heard multiple farmers have immunity, based on their exposure to farm animals who have corona virus in saliva. I know I got all teh symptoms of the virus following the second pneumonia shot, fever, chills cough, extreme exhaustion, for almost 3 days, did not call doc, try to avoid them. After that, temp check, before going out, going without a mask for four months (until DeWine made it criminal to to without), got lots of sun, vitalmins, Znc. I had read 1/2 of colds were corona virus, so this makes sense. Good article. Througout, I have practiced the breathing they require after anathesia to avoid pneumonia.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, definitely not. Neither of them. I have great respect for both in different ways, but no way I would work for one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 4 years, 11 months ago
    We will always be on the losing end when asshole politicians get to dictate to medical frontline doctors.
    Even worse when medical professionals turn political, Fauci, and have a major stake in the game with drug makers.
    YUP, take your HCQ with Zink and even a Z pack if your idiot political leaders have not yet banned it.
    Better yet, send your idiot political leaders to the unemployment lines as they have done to us.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He could have pulled a lot of people with him by just using a different communication style. I understand what you are saying about leadership. That is a very AS version I suppose. I have to say that I like Regan's style better. A little like Admiral Raborn vs Rickover.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Accident, instinct, or canny observation.
    Trump is often an insulting arrogant boor, but sometimes he is quite prescient.
    That used to be called leadership.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think he was right by accident, but right nonetheless.

    People just can't allow him to be right.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And that Trump was right all along about HCQ and COVID. His error was to listen to "experts" who have been wrong from the beginning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 11 months ago
    We can't publicize this. 1) it doesn't incite fear, outrage or panic. 2) it would show that Covid was taken care of during the Trump administration.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 11 months ago
    Yes, read that study and I think it was one of the 22 reports I posted. Also, the frontline doctors reported that study on monday, it was also mentioned on GB's radio show yesterday as well.

    Take your Hydroxychloroquine with Zinc and call us in the morning...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 11 months ago
    I can't wait for this thing to be over. I'm so sick of everyone panicking about getting sick to the point that it is destroying lives in so many other ways.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I haven't even had a cold in the 18 years since I had my first pneumonia vaccine and I had another vaccine just three years ago (Sister Salome wouldn't let me leave the hospital without it)!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Since 2011 I have lost two good friends from pneumonia and I know for a certainty they took the flu vaccine but not the pneumonia one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 11 months ago
    At the risk of getting my head chopped off I will reiterate...I do not take the flu vaccine. I've had four different kinds of flu. I do, however, take the pneumonia vaccine. The flu makes you want to die but the pneumonia can kill you! I wonder if any studies have been done on this subject with reference to the Covid19???
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 4 years, 11 months ago
    Great read. Thanks! I have reached out to the author. This is right in my wheelhouse...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 4 years, 11 months ago
    Good article, I like most of it, some comments-

    Herd immunity- a great range for this is claimed by a variety of experts some good some maybe not. I ask, must this concept exist for every pathogen? This doubt does not fit any of the political sides.
    Lockdown- as above, proofs that it works, and that it doesn't, are expressed with much emotion and with science and logic that have some validity but a long way from settling the matter. The answer could be the specifics, locality, conditions, type of infection.. ..

    Issues with a vaccine- can it work? how long would it take to test to the usual standards? How fast does the target mutate? So would a vaccine have to be redone every year? Compulsory on children and adults? You can have your own answers to those questions, anyway, it mean big big money.
    Thus, competition must be squelched. There are alternatives treatments and (maybe) cures. Therefore no limit to the suppression and censoring of these, and preventing large scale tests being done, and there is appalling character assassination, events over the last week, eg on the Nigerian born Texas doctor.

    Vaccine, there is a very good comment on-
    http://joannenova.com.au/2020/07/new-...
    and see the comment below that

    1. Koch’s postulate. The identification of a unique entity, has not been done in this case, so unlikely that a vaccine can be made.

    2. PCR test design. polymerase chain reaction. The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, said, “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.“

    3. WHO benefits. WHO, vaccine research, big pharma, big government, big noters.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo