10

BREAKING: Sources inside Trump Administration confirm to me that CDC has been misreporting the data for coronavirus to inflate the numbers.

Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 8 months ago to News
31 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

What would be the primary purpose of inflating C19 numbers?
Who benefits the most?
Pro-America v Anti-America.
Infiltration.
All assets deployed.
Election not virus.
Q

Real data (again) comparing seasonal flu deaths in Texas in 2017-2018, & 2018-2019, to C19 deaths in 2020 (data from Texas Dept of Health): 2019 flu data https://dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/disease... ; 2018 flu data https://dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/disease... 2020 C19 data as of 7/14/20 https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/o...


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 3 years, 8 months ago
    Basic data as simple as I can make it. A couple of weeks ago the NCHS stated that only 7% of total deaths attributed to covid-19 actually died of covid-19 alone...that is less than 12,000 people to date.

    Week ending date in which the death occurred Updated July 17, 2020
    All Deaths involving COVID-19 (U07.1)1 126,647
    Deaths from All Causes 1,420,658
    Deaths involving Pneumonia, with or without COVID-19, excluding Influenza deaths 135,158
    Deaths involving COVID-19 and Pneumonia, excluding Influenza 54,649
    ***All Deaths involving Influenza, with or without COVID-19 or Pneumonia 6,539 ??? Way Low!? don't you think?
    Deaths involving Pneumonia, Influenza, or COVID-19 212,737

    Conclusion? They have no clue who died of what...could it be anymore confusing?

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/CO...

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 8 months ago
    Motivations for exaggerating or falsifying numbers would be:
    -Power, creating a scare makes the public give power and give up rights to those who shout that they know what to do
    -Big pharma, opportunity for research grants and big sales that are not rationally evaluated
    -Political, current bad admin is failing
    -It sells more newspapers

    I suppose you could up come with reverse motivations- for the incorrect claim that data is false. So giving good sources is important.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 8 months ago
    The above links are corrupted
    https://www.dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/dis...
    https://www.dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/dis...
    https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/o...

    Texas has administered over 3,000,000 tests in 2020 for CV19
    What this data shows for Texas as an example.

    2017-2018 influenza deaths 11917
    2018-2019 influenza deaths. 10020
    2019-2020 Covid 19. Deaths. 3735
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 3 years, 8 months ago
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 8 months ago
        Question- Are deaths from flu being counted as from C19?

        I am inclined to say yes from general reading and the way that organizational incentives work, on top of political pulls.
        A fair amount of data is put out by Texas Health in that doc. MMWR-week26. (Thanks Dob)
        In 2019/20 flu deaths were 1,174 less than in 2018/19 suggesting to the suspicious (eg. me) that some have been shifted to blame C19. Look at the data again, flu deaths in 2018/19 were lower than in 2017/18. 2018/19 is too early for data shifting. Seems to be a declining death count from flu. So while I can be suspicious, cannot say the data supports a yes answer. Texas could be doing better on flu over some years, this is an interesting point.

        The Texas report , says-
        Deaths due to COVID-19 may be classified as pneumonia deaths or influenza deaths (deaths due to “flu” or “flu-like illness”) in the absence of positive SARS-CoV-2 test results.
        They may be doing the opposite. (?)
        Maybe I have missed something.
        The thing is, I need little convincing. I do talk to people with different views and give them what I think, huh sometimes uninvited. For that I do prefer to argue with good back-up data.

        On the Twtr link, good stories but the cases are not presented tightly enough for me to use as above.
        What struck me- Big Tec is making much of 'real' news, reliable data, etc, but doing a search I see there are eight, or more, Donald Trumps on Twtr, five show the usual face photo, one shows a head-and-shoulders. They look like the same person to me. Do all of those have that name? Do all look the same?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 3 years, 8 months ago
    Is there no department or faction of government that isn't corrupt anymore? Everything I look at today, I'm leery of, I question everything, I hardly believe anyone anymore. Everyone uses so call data to enhance whatever they want you to believe, whatever their agenda, for whatever reason. It just doesn’t make sense anymore how or why people twist the facts into something they in reality really don’t even want. For what purpose? I can only see it as a means to lead the blind into complete and total submission to some power that wants control of everything. I can see today why `they’ want history to go away, because history is factual data that results in the outcome of peoples actions and beliefs, real or imagined. Perception is reality, maybe we’re really not here, maybe it’s just all a dream, or nightmare, conceived in our minds.

    I have no idea what I'm talking about anymore, but I'll never admit it. But take a look at this theory on Covid-19: https://youtu.be/Ez_yY8-5ouM
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 8 months ago
    More, related:

    If given earlier worth repeating- ignore negative result tests, so get real scare 100% -
    https://www.fox35orlando.com/news/fox...

    PHE = public health England, the quango overseeing hospitals,
    cases counted as victims if they die of any cause any time after testing positive for Covid-19 – even if they were hit by a bus months after beating the life-threatening infection, .. ..
    so daily fatality tolls are not dropping quickly in England, deaths are blamed on the coronavirus – regardless of real cause or whenever.

    Gun shot death classed as COVID. New York Times .
    (Sorry, no link for above two)

    My opinion, this virus is serious and nasty, to deal with it, accurate data is important.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 3 years, 8 months ago
      Yes it is dangerous. So is the flu or pneumonia.
      Many dangers while navigating life. Unprotected sex , drinking and driving so many nasty dangerous things to consider. My body my life, be aware take precautions mitigate risk.

      Maybe the bigger danger is who and why is this false data being presented.
      Peace to Q
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 3 years, 8 months ago
    As soon as they start relying on foreign footage like that from the Italian hospitals in this case I'm out. Previous version of such fabrication was, under Obama, when they showed dead children in the dirt on the news during our family dinner trying to get the US to take out Assad. I was livid when my kids saw that. These people are just total crack whores for power...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 3 years, 8 months ago
    I dont trust anything media or government agencies say. They all have hidden agendas to convince us all of something that benefits them. I am so tired of this. I say, to hell with hidden agendas
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 3 years, 8 months ago
    a female friend of mine reported that her father-in-law and her husband went for covid19 testing a few days ago...after registering, they waited in line for the test...got tired of waiting and left....a short time later the test result came to them in an email...they tested positive....never took the test....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 3 years, 8 months ago
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/18/he...

    "Problems ranged from researchers entering and exiting the coronavirus laboratories without changing their coats, to test ingredients being assembled in the same room where researchers were working on positive coronavirus samples, officials said. Those practices made the tests sent to public health labs unusable because they were contaminated with the coronavirus, and produced some inconclusive results."

    Ruters: the CDC failed to follow protocol and contaminated a batch of tests, making them virtually ineffective. In the second paragraph of the same article, Ars Technica reports that “[t]he contamination did not spread the virus to people, but it made test results uninterpretable.”
    https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by oldtk 3 years, 8 months ago
    The virus was a last resort perpetrated by the Chinese. It is no coincidence that they will benefit from a Trump defeat. It is so incredibly obvious!!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 3 years, 8 months ago
    Nobody needs to be ordered to inflate the numbers. There's a 20% extra payment to medical facilities or nursing homes for treating COVID patients, so there's a clear motivation to inflate the numbers without anyone ordering a thing.

    There's a family here in Oklahoma who is suing the nursing home because it listed their father's death as a COVID death. In reality he was in the end stage of Alzheimers disease, and had stopped eating and drinking, which resulted in his death. He had tested positive for COVID, but showed only minor symptoms, like a slightly congested nose, but the nursing home put the cause of death as COVID, which the family claims was in an attempt to collect the 20% "bonus."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo